this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
664 points (98.8% liked)

politics

24577 readers
2895 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its not like there are enough people in the country illegally to fill the concentration camps the budget bill is going to pay for

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I can't get over just how short sighted MAGA is... They give the president this power like it will never be used against them by the next Democrat president.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It won't, democrats are giant pussies. They gave Biden a blank check from the supreme court to do official acts and he barely even got Trump prosecuted let alone actually punished.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, in doing so, he would have given Republicans something to point to and say, "See?? The democrats are unhinged power abusers!"

Not that it really makes a difference in the end.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Can't point if you're in a gulag.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago

Given that Democrats still have no idea that the GOP are champion Calvin Ball players, pretty sure it won't

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You think that after the changes made to the voting systems, the SAVE voting act, the firing of people at CISA responsible for election safety and security, and the migration of the voting devices to Starlink (even with orage mussilini and muskrat falling out) that there's ever going to be a Democratic president again? I wish I had your optimism. That's if a state of emergency/war isn't called that halts all elections, which is far more likely to be what happens.

Plus, the Democrats will just play good and "not stoop to the opposition's level", letting them just get creamed and steamrolled again in the following election, even if they do somehow manage to win. The Democrats had a chance to fight facism and they welcomed it with open arms. Without turning over nearly the entirety of the party, why does anyone think anything is ever going to change?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The supreme court gave total immunity to the president while Biden was president. He didn't use it a single time.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago

In the realm of republican politics (also known as the fucked supreme court), only republican presidents are given total immunity.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Like how Biden had Trump killed in 2024.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

If democrats ever had a candidate willing to whip his balls out and do something aggressively for a change.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You think the democrats would actually do that? They’d make a big deal about how they won’t do that, because they are cowards. The only spine they ever grow is when their corporate owners tell them to. Other than that, they care about nothing but maintaining the status quo.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Probably not, but one can hope

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I mean you can but it's foolish. What has the democratic party done to deserve your hope other than not be Trump?

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Funny thing is. Republicans allow their red-ass state legislatures to gerrymander their districts, while democrats act so high and nobel implementing their "non-partisan" commissions to "draw fair districts".

The house is forever skewed in favor of the right wing unless democrats play dirty and also gerrymander the shit out of those seats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, I hate gerrymandering but the notion that the Democrats should unilaterally disarm is very stupid.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

They tried in New York the last time the maps were redrawn. If Dems really wanted to gerrymander New York, they could likely win every single district.

The courts shot that one down, and now New York is just heavily favored to Dems. The House would be majority Dems right now if not for that alone.