this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
1211 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

12891 readers
1379 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But this would be eye wateringly expensive. Imagine all the towns and villages that buses serve and now lay rail on all the roads. But it would be even more crazy since the idea would be to increase frequency and variety of destinations.

Now you also need to buy expensive trams (relative to a bus), maintain both rail and roads.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago

The rails wear out far slower than roads, and rail vehicles don't need as much maintenance as road vehicles

If the rail vehicles displaced enough cars to reduce the need to resurface and rebuild the roads as often the economics could be good