this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
107 points (95.7% liked)

Nintendo

19066 readers
29 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
  8. Links to Twitter, X, or any alternative version such as Nitter, Xitter, Xcancel, etc. are no longer allowed. This includes any "connected-but-separate" web services such as pbs. twimg. com. The only exception will be screenshots in the event that the news cannot be sourced elsewhere.

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20 [Switch 2 Direct] | Apr 02 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So, Nintendo made it so only pirates can get the digital game now?

πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ

[–] finkrat@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Piracy is a service delivery failure

While it won't stop everyone, if that game were freely available I'm sure there would be several less folks emulating them right now

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Emulate the old games. Unlike the original SMAS, 3d All-Stars added nothing to the experience that can't be done with emulation. I say this as someone who bought it.

Nintendo reinventing the Disney Vaultℒ️ to artificially create scarcity

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure we'll all be surprised when those games are all rereleased at $70 each.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Reads like it was written by an ai:

  • drones on with tangential information
  • doesn't answer the question
[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reads like it was written by a marketing team.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Sometimes the AI tells the truth by accident

[–] Walican132@lemmy.today -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean the first sentence answered the question. It was available for a limited time due to 35th anniversary. It’s a dumb reason but the answer is right there.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's a rhetorical non-answer, "the 35th anniversary release was only available for a limited time because it was only available for a limited time".

There are hundreds of anniversary releases of games that are made permanently available - hence why people asked Nintendo why this one was given an artificially short availability so often that it became an FAQ question. They own the rights, they can sell it indefinitely if they want.

Eg: search Steam for 'anniversary' you'll find 600+ results.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Here’s why

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember hearing from many people, "I wasn't going to buy it, but it's only available for a limited period, don't want to miss out on it".

I voted with my wallet, and didn't buy it. I lost the vote though, since it sold pretty well.

Which explains why they did it. They created some hype, and earned some money, and still kept it for making some quick money by remaster / re-release when needed.

[–] MoogMuskie@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

I bought it when it came out even though I couldn't reasonably afford it, because at the time my stupid teen-aged self wanted to collect every Nintendo published game on the Switch, and thought the game was going to be sold out if I didn't get it. I was well aware it was scummy of Nintendo at the time, but I bought it because I was sure they wouldn't do it again. I even got the limited time Fire Emblem English translation and still haven't touched it yet.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

Please do not the game

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Batman@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks. I've never had the urge so bad to click no on the "Is this info helpful" question before.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 2 weeks ago

That didn't explained anyrhing

[–] fpslem@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Also, it should have had Super Mario Galaxy 2, it was crappy that they went from 4 games down to 3 for that All Star collection.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I had to buy a physical copy of eBay for like 90 bucks. It was bullshit, but my kid wanted it for his birthday and I couldn't say no.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago

β€žJapanese like it this way and we’re a Japanese company, deal with it” is a perfectly fine explanation. Japanese consumers love limited drops.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Pearl clutch The Vault.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's in the first three words of the article. It's celebrating the anniversary, so you buy it during the anniversary period. How long do you celebrate your birthday for? If you got a birthday present to celebrate your 35th birthday six months after you turned 50, is it still a 35th birthday present?

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's a dumb reason, but it is a reason

[–] Weebdeluxe@ani.social -1 points 2 weeks ago

Why exactly are we still bringing this up? We all know it was a shitty thing to do... this post reeks of ragebait.