GitHub's latest transparency report reveals that the company received 2,000 valid DMCA takedown notices last year, resulting in the removal of over 31,151 projects. Targeted repositories included copied code, but also pirate apps, IPTV playlists, and many Nintendo Switch emulators. Circumvention takedowns increased slightly, but GitHub notes that these continue to be heavily scrutinized.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 36 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hope developers start actually either self hosting forgejo or move to a platform that isn't run by a hostile organisation with ties to ICE (Microsoft), like codeberg.

[–] arisunz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

came here to say exactly this.

also y'all, consider donating to Codeberg if you have an account there, they've been getting hit nonstop the last week or so by chuds.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I'm curious about codeberg. It looks like they have a CI/CD pipeline. How does it compare to GitHub actions?

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 1 points 49 minutes ago

Forgejo Documentation says they should be familiar to people who use github actions, they're not the same but I found that when debugging some a few months back that github information was applicable, if that helps.

[–] arisunz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

couldn't tell you, never used either.

well, that's not entirely true. i self host Forgejo and Woodpecker, which i think (might be wrong here, especially because Forgejo does have its own CI/CD now) is what Codeberg offers. anyway, it's been OK for the automatic deployments of my little projects. pipeline configuration was flexible and straightforward enough to surprise me in a good way.