this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
458 points (99.8% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2623 readers
1076 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago

Good on them, I guess. But Twitter is only a small part of the problem.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 2 points 9 minutes ago

I was expecting the Spanish Inquisition, but I'll allow it.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Remember that time Anonymous fought Scientology? That's why we don't have Scientology anymore.

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 4 points 37 minutes ago

Can't tell if sarcastic or not.

Yeah, Scientology is still quite powerful but they were exposed for a lot during that attack.

Plus, this isn't the same group of people. Anonymous was never a set group of hackers or anything, it was a catch all name used back in the day to keep anonymity, and then later on a bunch of edgy dorks decided to pretend they were an actual organization

[–] Someplaceunknown@fedia.io 8 points 1 hour ago

Anonymous

Now that’s a name I haven’t heard in a while

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck, I wish we heard more about chaotic good hackers like this more often. They're like our modern day super heroes in some regard to me.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

I think they caught most of them from back when they were more active (2009-2012) or at least were more in the public eye.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Could they challenge DOGE?

[–] toxygen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Nice. I love anonymous.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 177 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

This is the energy Anonymous is supposed to have. I still fondly recall the work they did on Scientology.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

the energy Anonymous is supposed to have

Obligatory "Anonymous is not your personal army," but yeah, this is Anonymous at its best.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The energy that Anonymous as a social construct is supposed to have. I'm not here to give notes to any would-be vigilantes.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

My point was more that the notion that Anonymous is "supposed to have" any particular energy is kinda misunderstanding its nature. It's nice when it does good things, but when that happens it's only because people who did good things decided to label themselves as Anonymous, not because because there's some entity with good intent deciding what Anonymous should do.

[–] AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 58 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

One of the big - but to be expected - problems had always been, that basically every group or individual could don the "Anonymous" label. But yeah, this is in the spirit of the anti-authoritarian hacker identity, that it started out with.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Granted that any time humans wield anonymous power without oversight there will be bad behaviour. When I was younger I took for granted that a key part of the social construct of Anonymous was an ironic awareness of that, hence its suitability for striking back at high-handed enemies of humanity.

I was quite young back then.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Bunch of anons: DDoS Xitter

Elona: Ukraine did it!

Wait before this dimwit will start screaming of casus belli against an unfriendly Ukraine and the USA will start selling Russia weapons.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 69 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There is no way this is the same guys who went after Scientology, however, I do love whoever they are. We need more people fighting fascism.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 23 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They're based on the AnonOps IRC so it is, technically, the same sect of Anonymous. Although anyone can join and start an Op there so...

https://opdreadnought.com/us

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah... I'd be real careful getting started by joining a particular irc server known for anything.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

This was YEARS ago. Haven't been on there in over a decade now ;)

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 34 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Twitter is working fine, "blackouts" aren't what they used to be. DDOS attacks aren't really hacking, and would barely interrupt services at the level today's "anonymous" has access to.

People claiming to be anonymous hackers very slightly inconvenience whoever's still on Twitter.

I'm no fan of Musk, but something more powerful needs to be done.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 23 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Voting. Voting could have been done. I know it sounds trite and overly simplistic, but that's the power We The People have, as set up in the founding of our country. We just have to use it...

How many people sat out in 2024, as everyone politically-engaged screamed that a Trump administration would be bad for the economy, bad for Palestinians, bad for Ukrainians, and bad for America (because it might literally elect a fascist dictator who will enact Project 2025 and refuse to give up their power)? Several thousand? That sounds reasonable, right? Maybe up to hundreds of thousands? Maybe even a million people...? No. 90 million people who were eligible to vote in the presidential election didn't vote by mail, ignored the election drop boxes, and sat at home on Election Day.

That's enough to beat any entrenched political coalition opposed to progress. That's not some "pie in the sky" fantasy, we literally had the numbers to accomplish every single political agenda that actually helps working Americans:

#If "Did Not Vote" was a candidate:

I say this all without an ounce of schadenfreude. I genuinely don't want to hurt the faces of the people who voted for the leopards, not least of all because we all suffer along with them. I will keep shouting this point because we have to do better in the future. Voting isn't always fun, but it's the first and most powerful defense against a wannabe dictator like Trump or Musk. I literally don't care how "not excited" you are about the candidate that doesn't want to tear the US apart, you need to vote, and vote against fascism. That's our only hope going forward...

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

we literally had the numbers to accomplish every single political agenda that actually helps working Americans

Great! Now all you need is a candidate who runs on that.

[–] Screamium@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Don't let great be the enemy of good

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Well, we're certainly not winning now.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 33 minutes ago

That should tell you something.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Billionaires will never allow you to vote away their power.

Never

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 21 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess we should actually try it first before succumbing to defeatism in advance, no? There's a lot more of us than there is of them... What is it people say about the 4 Boxes to be used in defense of Liberty:

  1. soap
  2. ballot
  3. jury
  4. ammo

"Please use in that order."

(That's a quote from Frederick Douglas)

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. We've never actually used our voting privileges. Not really.

Whenever I hear the argument that voting doesn't do anything, I cringe.

When people show up (not just for presidential elections), shit gets done.

But Muricans are lazy and expect others to do the work for them

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 2 points 2 hours ago

Australia has mandatory voting and the mining industry still owns this country.

Just because America makes it cheap to buy an election doesn't mean it could ever be unaffordable.

[–] jared@mander.xyz 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Did you know mining billionaires is a great way to recover stolen power and resources?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 29 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children)

Where were these fuckers before the election‽ They did a lot of talk in the lead up to Nov 6th but then nothing came of it

Now they actually want to do something lmao

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Before the election, they had to look out for the CSRB and CISA. Now… not so much.

[–] annette_runner@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They were probably murdered by the CIA or something. Who would know?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 4 points 2 hours ago

you misspelled suicide

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

where were these fuckers before the election

Shitposting on chan boards, running right wing grifts, spreading QAnon conspiracies…

[–] BJ_and_the_bear@lemm.ee 9 points 5 hours ago

I'm not sure what launching a DDoS would have accomplished... Twitter will be back soon enough

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

Surely they just clicked the 'X' button and it closed itself down?

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 15 points 5 hours ago

Apparently that's what the news is saying

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago

Honestly, even if it isn't doing much, it's making a statement which is more than enough.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 14 points 5 hours ago

Wow it's been a little while since I've heard Anonymous taking credit

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Makes me wonder,

Similar to all the peeps 20 years ago in the SETI@home movement, where you could donate your CPU/bandwidth.

Is there any 'safe' way to donate and collectively protest on the internet by signing up to a botnet?

[–] princess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 hours ago

low orbit ion cannon and friends were tools for participating in anon ddos ops back in the day, but it wasn't exactly safe -- without a vpn your isp and other intermediaries can see your traffic, and the host can see your ip address. with a vpn you're in part dosing your vpn, depending on the attack

no idea how anon organizes such things these days

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Finally, someone is stepping up!

load more comments
view more: next ›