this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
715 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

2145 readers
54 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cabbagewitch@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s just asking it m to find sources from excerpts. I don’t think this is something they have been trained on with much emphasis is it?

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, this isn't a general test of "factualness", it's a very narrow and specific subset of capability that many of these AIs were not designed for.

That being said, it does not change my already poor opinion of generative AI.

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

AI has its uses: I would love to read AI written books in fantasy games (instead of the 4 page books we currently have) or talk to a AI in the next RPG game, hell it might even make better random generated quests and such things.

You know, places where hallucinations don't matter.

AI as a search engine only makes sense when/if they ever find a way to avoid hallucinations.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Is the plan for AI to give tech plausible deniablity when it lies about politics and other mis/dis information?

[–] argon@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago

Identifying the source of an article is very different from the common use case for search engines.

1:1 quotes of web pages is something conventional search engines are very good at. But usually you aren't quoting pages 1:1.

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

That's probably why I end up arguing with Gemini. It's constantly lying.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago

I mean, the tech is changing faster than science can analyize it, but isnt this now outdated?

I dont use AI but a friend showed me a query that returned the sources, most of which were academic and appeared trustworthy

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I like how when you go pro with perplexity, all you get is more wrong answers

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

That's not true, it looks like it does improve. More correct and so-so answers.

[–] ExtravagantEnzyme@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Go figure, the one providing sources for answers was the most correct...But pretty wild how it basically leaves the others in the dust!

[–] Halliphax@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

AI can be a load of shite but I’ve used it to great success with the Windows keyboard shortcut while I’m playing a game and I’m stuck or want to check something.

Kinda dumb but the act of not having to alt-tab out of the game has actually increased my enjoyment of the hobby.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›