this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
728 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

22187 readers
1620 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 218 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tech guy invents the concept of giving instructions

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 114 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With clear requirements and outcome expected

Why did no one think of this before

[–] wtckt@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago

Who does that? What if they do everything right and it doesn't work and then it turns out it's my fault?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 119 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It would be nice if it was possible to describe perfectly what a program is supposed to do.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah but that's a lot of writing. Much less effort to get the plagiarism machine to write it instead.

[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 79 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a... code

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?

[–] maiskanzler@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We don't want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What, like some kind of design requirements?

Heresy!

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Design requirements are too ambiguous.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Design requirements are what it should do, not how it does it.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

I'm a systems analyst, or in agile terminology "a designer" as I'm responsible for "design artifacts"

Our designs are usually unambiguous

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

That's why you must negotiate or clarify what is being asked. Once it has been accepted, it is not ambiguous anymore as long as you respect it.

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think our man meant in terms of real-world situations

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And NOT yet another front page written in ReactJS.

Oh, well, that's good, because I have a ton of people who work with Angular and not React.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This still isn't specific enough to specify exactly what the computer will do. There are an infinite number of python programs that could print Hello World in the terminal.

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

I knew it, i should've asked for assembly

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ha

None of us would have jobs

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

I think the joke is that that is literally what coding, is.

[–] Lime66@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Who even makes these comics? Is it like Simpsons

[–] zerofk@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Randall Munroe. You may know him from such gems as xkcd 3472 and 6548.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 days ago

Getting a bit ahead of yourself, we're only on 3070 so far!

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Web browsing 101: if you see a hyperlink on social media, you can click on it and then look around to see if it contains more links with useful information, often in the header or footer of the page. Here I found one for you: https://xkcd.com/about/

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Human communication 101: sometimes humans ask a question without expecting an answer, it's called a rhetorical question

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 days ago

Sorry, I assumed this was a place of discussion and conversation. You can either be helpful or don't, it's generally considered a dick move to taunt while being helpful.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

I wrote a shell script like this (it admin , notna dev) for private use.
The prompt took me like 5 hours of rewriting the instructions.
Don't even know yet if it works (lol)

[–] undefinedValue@programming.dev 28 points 2 days ago (4 children)

OP just chatting with themselves so they can screenshot it?

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is some telegram group and both messages shows from left with profile icons(which got cropped). The screenshot person sent the last message which shows double ticks

[–] andrybak@startrek.website 4 points 2 days ago

In the desktop client the positions of bubbles also depend on the width of the window.

[–] Talia@feddit.it 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's just a fake conversation in general, look at the timestamps between the messages from the interlocutor. Several minutes to type a complete sentence?

[–] StellarSt0rm@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Hey, i can take a few hours to reply sometimes :c

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Great attention to detail!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›