this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
663 points (98.5% liked)

politics

22655 readers
3714 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Seventy days into his second term, Donald Trump faces growing internal turmoil and public backlash. Allies report he’s making late-night angry calls, upset over negative press and policy setbacks.

The "Signalgate" scandal and GOP resistance to new tariffs have shaken his administration. Trump blames National Security Adviser Mike Waltz for a messaging blunder and resents criticism of his deportation efforts.

His attempts to end wars in Gaza and Ukraine have faltered.

Republicans fear economic fallout from his trade policies, raising concerns about recession and inflation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 hours ago

He is surprised that he's getting bad press. That's how stupid Trump is. Not only does he think the things he's doing are good ideas, he legitimately thinks people will actually praise him for doing it.

[–] kaotic@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago

Trump doesn't have friends; he has lackeys and people who want to gain something by getting in his favor. Others follow and agree with him out of fear of retaliation.

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What negative press? His supporters are all in. They're brigading every online message board and spamming about how this is great for the country.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Those are bots. The majority of MAGA supporters probably don't even remember their account passwords.

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I wish I could believe this. I've made the mistake of engaging with them on MSN and it's a full blown Jonestown style cult. They are ready to lose everything for Trump.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don't have the link, but I read somewhere that this was actually part of the Project 2025 plan, to use sockpuppet accounts and bots to drown online discourse and prevent anyone messaging that hurts the movement from picking up steam and going viral. (Althougj the strategy is probably different on platforms they control, like Twitter and maybe Reddit)

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

I could certainly see this being something they're doing. Flooding the zone to give the impression of support. The problem with right wing rhetoric is that it's very attractive to the uninformed. It's really really easy to be a racist, for example. It's much harder to instill empathy.

I think it's working. Right as people were finally leaving Twitter during the election season and moving to Lemmy, Blue sky, mastodon, threads, etc. The election was already in full swing. So support on the left was fractured and disconnected from the main spaces where it would reach normal folks. Twitter, Truth Social, and Facebook remained strong and their message was everywhere all the time.

What do we do to stop it though? Grass roots grow Lemmy into something respectable? By the time it gets popular enough to matter, the right will invade and corrupt it.

[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 28 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

How does this old ass dude have so much goddamn energy? I am in my PRIME and I need naps.

[–] Isthisreddit@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's not like he really does anything except golfs, eats McDonald's, possibly gropes or sexually assaults young girls (some habits are hard to break - grab them by the pussy right?). He doesn't read, doesn't think - he basically signs whatever heritage foundation and his rich friends put in front of him to sign.

[–] Sporkbomber@lemm.ee 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Stimulants. Where do you think Jr. gets it from?

[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

How do I get some and what are they called? 🤣

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Most likely ADHD meds. They will keep you up and running for awhile. He will eventually fall to time though, like we all do.

"Nothing fucks you harder than time." -Davos Seaworth

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

speed, some guy called "Squigz" who you can find under the bridge after 10pm every night.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Squigz is in charge of US drug policy now.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

I thought that was Leon's dealer?

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 7 points 10 hours ago
[–] InTheDoghouseAgain@lemm.ee 25 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

After reading the article I found it quite amusing the fact he is disappointed his allies have not supported him

That’s how the rest of the world feels

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago

Especially since in his case “support” means unconditional loyalty and subservience.

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 6 points 10 hours ago

It's surprising how few supporters you get when they aren't allowed to criticise you in any way

[–] firebyte@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What are the chances of him being booted out via 25th Amendment in the next six months?

It might buy JD just enough time to prevent the Republicans being utterly wiped out in the mid-terms...

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I will now gaze wistfully into the near distance and contemplate life under the more competent evil.

[–] firebyte@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

I'm not sure he's much more competent, especially when it comes to successfully undoing the damage just enough to keep the GOP in power, by the skin of their teeth, whilst still grifting everything that isn't welded down.

That, and he doesn't and likely will never have the cult of personality.

I'd wager that once he who shall not be named is removed from office, the rest of the party will implode into a self-interested factional civil war.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

More competent but significantly less likeable for the bade. Trump slides by with what passes as charisma to stupid people, but vance is such a bitch that I can't imagine them rallying around him.

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

I hear that, but would also consider the monied interests would like more stability, and would ease the rallying behind Vance... probably.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 47 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It will end up like brexit. Most people who voted for him will stay in the sect no matter what. When enough people finally switch to hand power back to the democrats it will be too late to simply reverse most of what Trump did and slow rebuilding will start. If Democrats elect competent leaders they will actually fix things. If not they will just continue working with what Trump left for them (like with Starmer)

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Brexit is like herpes. It just keeps on giving.

[–] OnASnowyEvening@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

and slow rebuilding will start.

And then Democratic voters will get complacent, or get all pissy about how their pet project for change isn't getting enough attention fast enough, and not vote the next time leading to a Republican getting back in office BECAUSE SURELY THAT WILL HELP THEIR FUCKING PRECIOUS INTERESTS. It worked out so~ well this past Fall, didn't it? Nothing at all~ to be concerned about, worried about, uncertain about, or terrified about now.

If Democrats elect competent leaders

Pelosi and Schumer, and all their fanbois (people listening to them even when they aren't in office), would need to go.

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I wonder just how bad things will have to get for a most people to vote.

I can only hope that democrats learn that no matter how bad the republican candidate is or how bad their outward plans they need to run a popular person.

It’s been proven there is not a Republican candidate bad enough to make people vote for their interests.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 13 points 14 hours ago

Trump has any sense of reality?

[–] llamatron@lemmy.world 35 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Will no one rid us of this turbulent moron?

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Time will. Just not soon enough.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 30 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 5 points 12 hours ago

I'd imagine he thinks that other evil rich people and sycophants whose immoral compasses are aligned are his friends, but in reality they're around because it benefits them (or they think it does), and they'd stab him in the back as soon as it benefits them. (It's just that so far it hasn't benefited their morally corrupt causes yet.) So people like the deceased Epstein, and Canadian traitors Kevin O'Leary and Gretzky. AB Premier Danielle Smith wouldn't even be an afterthought of a "friend" in this context, but she's trying so desperately hard to be accepted, it's pathetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 58 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I'm supposing this dumbfuck really thought he was going to get praise for this?

The problem is that he's been safely ensconced in a bubble his entire fucking life. He's Patient Zero when it comes to rich white failsons failing upwards, FFS.

[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

yeah some progressive senator/rep was saying this was actually 10d chess on trump's part to extract concessions from industries in exchange for tariff relief, and, maybe, but also, you know, there is the other explanation

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

this was actually 10d chess on trump’s part to extract concessions

It’s called a shakedown. Instead of actually talking to someone, start by threatening them then extract concessions. Best deal maker ever

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›