I know this is petty, but I don't care. Why is it that these people always have the most generic, first-gen AI created names and the most fucked up faces? I know fascism doesn't inherently attract the best, brightest, and most interesting but come on. It's like they just hit random on the Oblivion character creator and said "Brooke Rollins with the fivehead? Looks good to me!"
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
224 points (99.1% liked)
politics
22655 readers
3935 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My hypothesis was always that anger and hate make you ugly. It physically changes you because you are constantly stressed, scared and on edge.
These people wake up hating and being angry and go to bed angry, that's why 99% of white supremacist / religious extremists looks like garbage bags filled with vomit.
Super valid points. Cortisol is one heluva drug.
Let's be real. We have people like my mother that will watch Fox News, totally ignore the window with stock prices and agree these will help farmers. There won't be any ah, ha moment for her. 25 years of propaganda will not break her from the cult.
ignore the window with stock prices
The best part is she won't even have to. Apparently, as of yesterday, it's no longer even there.
They want a global recession.
They want to buy up assets for pennies on the dollar with their existing mega fortunes.
Idk if they've taken into account the fact that they're devaluing the USD, but they probably have gold or some shit idk.
Devaluating the dollar might be the goal, not a side effect: A Users Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System
That's a lot of information, could you give us here a tldr?
This is the gist of the summary on the front page:
Tariffs provide revenue, and if offset by currency adjustments, present minimal inflationary or otherwise adverse side
effects, consistent with the experience in 2018-2019. While currency offset can inhibit adjustments to trade flows, it
suggests that tariffs are ultimately financed by the tariffed nation, whose real purchasing power and wealth decline,
and that the revenue raised improves burden sharing for reserve asset provision. Tariffs will likely be implemented in a
manner deeply intertwined with national security concerns, and I discuss a variety of possible implementation schemes.
I also discuss optimal tariff rates in the context of the rest of the U.S. taxation system.
Currency policy aimed at correcting the undervaluation of other nations’ currencies brings an entirely different set of
tradeoffs and potential implications. Historically, the United States has pursued multilateral approaches to currency
adjustments. While many analysts believe there are no tools available to unilaterally address currency misvaluation, that
is not true. I describe some potential avenues for both multilateral and unilateral currency adjustment strategies, as well
as means of mitigating unwanted side effects.
Thank you
They’re giddy making a fortune shorting right now because they knew this was coming. Because this fucked country hasn’t outlawed politicians from investing in the stock market.
This is a sale for them. While the upper and middle class has to sell, they're making money on it by buying up companies for dirt cheap.
~~Bahahaah, I think some folk are sad about this article~~
Edit: Commenter was correct, darn. Replaced image where the needle was off the left side. It changes after voting.
Ground News (source rating)
I thought that was the meter's default position before casting a vote, because that's where I see the needle in every article of theirs.
It's a terribly biased design and makes me question their reporting skills. Anyone knows if you have to show a default value it should be placed in a neutral position, otherwise you bias the poll/study/etc.
The default being all the way to the left isn't good.
Probably more like right-wing astroturfing hitting every article with bots voting "unfair left leaning" the second an article publishes.
You're right, damn I feel silly
it was almost painful to watch the shuffle, shuffle, shuffle, shuffle
It was subtle, but the stock ticker listing of currency/USD to get a bunch of green triangles in there, and then the price of eggs using the red triangle to really throw the green=good/red=bad paradigm off was inspired, in a malicious and slimy sorta way.
CBC had similar graphics during the first round of response from Trudeau too and it was great
Context?