Any place that asks for this is a place I have no interest in working. I'll consider making an exception when they submit their video to me first.
this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
57 points (98.3% liked)
Ask Lemmy
30662 readers
1583 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
No, employers need to be legally restricted from learning anything about you besides your resume.
The only thing you get to know about them is what they present online.
We want equal and fair relationships with the employers that we are forced to depend on for survival.
Hell are you on about? Interviews are for both parties to get to know one another. Just nailed one last week where both of us were more interested in company culture and personality fit than technical expertise. Offer comes Monday. $90K.
FFS, y'all need to grow the fuck up and realize the employers aren't holding all the cards. Been at Lowe's for 3-months. Worked hard, kicked ass, learned, already got a promotion. I've moved up, or at least laterally, to a better position in every job within 6-months, tops. And I've had loads of jobs.
Or, you can just turtle up, cry that's it's all hopeless and unfair. How's that working out guys?
No lol, one of us has our life dependent on obtaining employment and the other is an owner of capital whos life is not.
Good for you, champ.
My ex had to do this a lot. She's ESL though so I just figured that was the reason.
I'm a softwate engineer and never saw anything like it before myself, but I didn't think much of it because my own interview process is so fucked up lol.
I'd kill to only have to do that and go through other behaviorals 🤣
No, absolutely not. I've had one employer try that shit with me and immediately withdrew my application. They basically have AI review your video and judge you based purely off of your physical characteristics. Honestly I don't know why an employer would want to open themselves up to the liability of using such a tool. Ultimately, if my application isn't worth the time and effort of an actual person to review, then I'm not interested in your position.
No. I did one once. It felt incredibly degrading. I decided then that I would never do one again. I am a person. Not fucking cattle at the county fair. If a company feels my time is worth less than theirs and I'm just supposed to trot on out and look pretty so they can gawk at me and decide if they think I'm worth a chance at the "grand prize", without including me in the conversation, then we are NOT going to be a good fit.
In the tech world, some companies want you to do a take home project. They say things like, this will only take an hour, yet it normally takes like 4+ hours for most people. Anyway, I finally got one interview like this and I will not work for a company that pulls this crap.
I decided to go through with it and just post it online for anyone to see. I did the project, sent them the GitHub URL and did everything exactly as they asked. They responded with, can you make that a private repo and give the people permissions that need it. I told them I would rather keep it public and that I won't be doing that. I never signed an NDA, so there was no way for them to force me to take it down.
Fuck all these places that do this type of shit.
No. Never. It's demeaning and unnecessary.
I know it happens nowadays, but I've been on both sides of the hiring process and I refuse to have any part in it.
As a hiring manager I find it to be a complete waste of time. I’d rather talk to someone for 15 min and decide whether or not to push forward with a longer format interview than waste 5 watching a video.
Same. Hell, the conversation doesn't even have to be in person - a phone call will do.
I did one a few months ago for a university. When I was done it asked for feedback, so I submitted some along the lines of, "I understand you may have numerous applicants, but this interview format does not align with the respect or attentiveness I expect from an employer."
Needless to say, no call back
Edit: a word
As I stated elsewhere, I refuse to take part in any hiring process that involves a one way video aspect. But I'm not 100% against using it as a filter: The first bar in the hiring process is to refuse the video interview.
I knew as soon as they sent me instructions that I would refuse the job, but I figured it was good interview practice since I've only done 3 in 10 years
Depends on the role and the company, but if they make you do an AI interview without a human recluter's screening first that is a red flag for me
What in the fuck? Never seen that, but I wouldn't bother at that point
Major companies like JnJ do this, so if you wouldn't bother then you're likely turning away good jobs.
I would argue you're never going to be treated with more respect by a company than during the interview process. Once you're on the payroll you have an incentive to tolerate objectionable treatment. If a company is willing to be this audacious in the interview stage I would have little hope of it getting better in that regard.
If your employer doesn't respect you, it's not a "good" job, even if it's a well-paying job.
Every company sucks. Might as well get paid well. But you do you.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ never heard of them, so probably not a job im qualified for anyways x3
Why do I have a feeling they are talking about the horrible company, Johnson and Johnson. You know, the company that has been actively fucking America's best interests and health over for decades
The acronym would fit :3
You know, the company that has been actively fucking America's best interests and health over for decades
Not american not one im familiar with, still x3. Guessing insurance by that tho
Every healthcare company has been fucking America for decades. They're all unethical as shit. I'm just giving general advice to get a good job and paycheck for yourself.
I have an axiety disorder, so I'm suing for discrimination.
I'm not exactly neurotypical and I'm not good at in-person interviews. When I did video interview when applying for a training course, I did fine, because I wrote down a script. ...What I'm getting at is that this video interview could have been an email. (Edit: Also didn't get chosen for the course, so, meh)
Yeah, HireVue. My company uses them for some job postings at the discretion of the hiring manager.
In general I don't like them. I've seen some job postings that get literally hundreds of applicants though, so I get the company would look for ways to process that many more efficiently. I also think it would be difficult for a hiring manager not to judge an applicant on "video presence", hardly a skill that is top of the priority list for most jobs.
If AI sorting of videos is available I've not seen my company use that feature. To my knowledge, all videos are reviewed by humans. From a previous Lemmy posting about HireVue, I also learned it can be set to only allow one attempt at recording and answering a question, or unlimited.
I kinda think of it as an escalating arms race. Companies put filters in place for resumes. Applicants found tools that aid them in mass applying with a single click. Companies add more filters like HireVue now to deal with the flood of applicants. Applicants are replying by declining or posting to GitHub or whatever.
It’s not a scam but it’s also not likely to lead to a job. Large companies that get massive amounts of applications use them. But smaller companies may also get a lot of applications and just do traditional phone screens, so who knows?
If it's Hirevue, I stopped bothering after 5 or so, I'd never got through one and yet managed to get through every single HR phone screen etc.
It depends if it's AI grading it or not I guess, as AI has no understanding of nuance so will just accept a very narrow range of similar candidates
Only if I was desperate.
I would have to be out of a job for a long time with no prospects to consider doing it. It's so demeaning
every story I've heard about them sounds like yours.
ESL industry is always looking for native speakers to teach English, for your back pocket.
I just did one... frustrating
Did you wink at the end?
Sadly I think I lost a job opportunity
I have, and this was a few years ago. However, the one I did had prompts. Like, and interview question, I record my answer, and then so on. It did feel... Weird. But as long as the company is legit, it should be fine.