This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
About a minute later, it was posted by the X account "Walter Bloomberg," which has more than 850,000 followers. Although the account is not affiliated with Bloomberg News, it often shares the news organization's headlines. The account's boosting of the false headline prompted chatter among CNBC analysts on live television about a possible 90-day reprieve from Trump's tariffs.
This ist the dumbest fucking timeline.
What do you mean? I get my news from John Fox and Peter Newsmaxx
You got your laptop from Tim Apple, right?
I got my jobs from Steve wait I did this wrong
It's kind of frightening that people who control that much capitol are apparently unaware that social media is not gospel truth.
Not just that, but "Reuters and CNBC reported it" as well. It snowballed from X to mainstream news then back to X again and back to people talking in "reputable" news again, again and again.
At this point I'm wondering just how much if any that mainstream for-profit media is any better than X at reporting anything at all.
That's the neat part.
Ever since 'journalism' has been reduced to reposting social media posts, there is very little reputation to be had.
Perhaps especially after this.
especially reposting only X, AND TRUTH SOCIAL post.
It's not. Which is why I've barely paid any attention to it in my entire adult life.
They probably care less about whether it is true, and more about whether they can get their buy in before everybody else.
It was a pump-and-dump scam, I'm almost sure of it.
Someone made millions off of that Xeet.
Someone made millions off of that Xeet.
I prefer to call them Xcrements
Xat
consider that profiting off volitility and lazyness is generally a good strategy.
That's only works when you are running the OP, rest of us end up bag holding
Just invest gold and wait for the inevitable heart attack/assassination/assassination made to look like a heart attack
Not big on commodities tbh
Also metals are hyper manipulated markets for various reasons so they don't trade like boomer gold big think they do
In statements to NPR, Reuters said it has withdrawn the incorrect report, blaming a headline published on CNBC. When asked for comment, CNBC said it "aired unconfirmed information in a banner," which it "quickly" corrected.
What in the absolute fuck?
Market manipulation
Yeah. Money is not lost in finance markets, it is redistributed. Reading any of this as random and/or unintentional is beyond naive.
IDK, it wouldn't be the first time a news org published some random shit as fact because they're too eager to be the first to report on something.
Redistributed up.
I prefer "siphoned"
...by whom? A random Twitter user? CNBC? Reuters?
Anyone who could make this news break would be in a position to steal unfathomable amounts of money in broad daylight, and get away with it.
I think we should always suspect bad actors in cases like this, and investigate thoroughly. It's too easy of a scam with too much money to be made.
Maybe there is nobody to blame. But assuming so just seems incredibly naive to me considering the amount of bad actors and the ease of pulling a stunt like this.
Anyone who could make this news break would be in a position to steal unfathomable amounts of money in broad daylight, and get away with it.
They'd also have to be in a position to lose a ridiculous amount of of money in the extremely likely case that no one looks twice at their completely unsupported Tweet.
Should we look at it? Absolutely. Do I see any evidence? No. Literally anyone could have tweeted the same thing. The far more likely scenario, in my eyes, is that these news orgs saw this Tweet picking up traction from a bunch of idiots and couldn't take the risk of being the last one to report the "news", and so went ahead and reported completely unfounded non-sense anyway.
went ahead and reported completely unfounded non-sense anyway.
The White House is now such a mess I don't know how organizations would even go about verifying this anyway. You can ask for an official statement and it's just a random guess by someone these days, it's not an official statement of policy.
If you control social media, you also control who gets to see what in their feeds.
these are the people who are leading us into a recession… they fall for a fucking random tweet…
Maybe it was deliberate cause it’s all a big game.
2025 and people are still treating X as a source of information.
youtube comments section has more reliability than what Twitter ever did
X where are all musk bros, and trumpers are the one holding the bags.
Do it again pls
What was that they said during the stupid reddit thingy with stock markets? "It's not a casino"?
Sir, this is a Wendy's
I mean kinda. Except that the odds are actually stacked in your favor.
Isnt that blatant market manipulation? Rule of law is thing in the past now.
the twitter post didn't cause it to happen the idiot in the white house did with his stupid trade war.
I saw the video. A reporter asked if the president would consider a 90 day pause and the white house guy responds with "yeah, well, you know, the president is going to do what he wants to do."
But the first thing out of the fucking guys mouth was "yeah". So of course the reporter is going to run with it when it was literally just a filler word cuz the dude didn't know how to answer the question.
