this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
786 points (99.2% liked)

News

28765 readers
4540 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The commander of the base wrote, "I do not presume to understand current politics, but what I do know is the concerns of the US administration discussed by Vice-President Vance on Friday are not reflective of Pituffik Space Base." in an email and was thus dismissed. In dismissing her, the Pentagon stated this reason. "Actions [that] undermine the chain of command or to subvert President [Donald] Trump's agenda will not be tolerated at the Department of Defense."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 96 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Replacing base commanders is very indicative of a potential military coup

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

May you live in interesting times

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Too fucking interesting if you ask me

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] parody@lemmings.world 3 points 6 days ago

x squeeze me rudeeee :)

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 89 points 6 days ago (5 children)

-.-

Chain-of-command means orders come from your immediate superior doesn't it? Adding "Or to Subvert President Trump's agenda" pretty much nullifies that and by default makes our military on par with Russia's. Good weapons do fuck and all when not used as intended.

Putin must be laughing his ass off at how effectively he's destroying the US military without firing a single shot at it.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 59 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Putin must be laughing his ass off at how effectively he's destroying the US military without firing a single shot at it.

Yeah this. Very much.

Without Trump Putin would've been finished, but since Trumputler, Russia is still an actual danger to the world.

Russian disinfo is just so fking prevalent and idiots fall for it. And most people are idiots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (3 children)

That's not what chain of command means. It simply establishes the hierarchy. Commands can be given by anyone who outranks you, or holds a billet that comes with higher authority. Trump and Vance at the top of that chain and can issue legal orders to literally anyone in the US military.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not that the rule of law matters, but the VP is not in the military chain of command. There is no vice commander-in-chief. It goes pres then his Chiefs of Staff/Generals.

Of course they could just lean on the undermining trumps agenda of stripping Greenland of its resources, but that's not why the base was there. Or I guess that is why it's there now.....idk.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, second in command is the Secretary of Defense. But if the Vice President is acting on behalf or under direction of the president it could be seen as a billet. Walking around bases every unit has pictures of their chains of command, all of them include the VP and have for a long time.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Makes sense since VP could have to assume role of president instantly if president dies or is removed from office or resigns. But if they are only disabled, then VP becomes acting president. Made me wonder whether acting president or the disabled president will be commander-in-chief then.

I googled a bit and could've figured it out probably. But that's a pretty niche question.

I know this will bring in the downvotes but I think LLMs aren't horrible for use like this.

I asked it "if the president of the US was disabled then the vice president would become the acting president but not the actual president but would that mean that they would also be the acting Commander in Chief?"

And got a decent reply with a low chance of any hallucinations, because of the nature of the facts and it showing it's reasoning.

Yes, if the Vice President becomes the Acting President due to the President's disability, they also assume the powers and duties of the Commander in Chief. Here's why:

  • Presidential Succession and the 25th Amendment:
    • The 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution addresses presidential succession and disability.
    • Section 3 and 4 of the 25th amendment specifically outline the processes for the vice president to become acting president in cases of presidential disability.
    • When the vice president becomes the acting president, they assume "the powers and duties of the office as Acting President."
  • Commander in Chief is a Presidential Duty:
    • The role of Commander in Chief is a fundamental duty of the President of the United States, as outlined in the Constitution.
    • Therefore, when the vice president becomes acting president, that person gains all of the powers and duties of the president, including the commander in chief role.
[–] whiskeytango@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They can issue orders. Not all are legal. But since they replaced the JAGs, this might be closer to reality.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Hopefully they all remember their oaths of enlistment are to the Constitution first, THEN the president.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

I've heard that the green crayons are good for abstract thought about legality.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

If they remembered, they would have rolled through the supreme court building the day they said we have kings again.

Military ain't gonna do shit.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The concept of chain of command also implies that higher rank alone does not entitle a higher-ranking service member to give commands to anyone of lower rank.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

There grey areas in parallel chains but all chains end in Washington at the capital.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago

Putin must be laughing his ass off at how effectively he’s destroying the US military without firing a single shot at it.

It's one for the books to be sure. Also there are a huge portion of Americans cheering it on because they're too stupid to know better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 6 days ago (2 children)

She is a patriot. Col Susannah Meyers deserves a medal, and I'm sure she would do 10,000x better as VP than the jerk we have now.

Vance seems smart, and obviously he married outside his "race" so somewhat open-minded. Which means he is acting out of pure conscienceless ambition. IMO worse than Trump, who is an evil idiot.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe he married outside of his race because she's a hot piece of ass and out of his league and he didn't put much more consideration into it than that?

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

If he was actually bothered by race Vance wouldn't find her attractive.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

he even has a degree in philosophy…
and trump isn’t an idiot, he just plays the idiot so idiots will vote for him… just like george dubya bush…
i mean, he’s not very smart or as smart as he thinks he is, but he’s not as stupid as he seems

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The way he talks, looks, acts. I'm pretty sure he's an idiot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Yeah gotta disagree with you there. Trump is senile and baseline average at best.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Maybe that claim would hold water if there was any evidence at all that Trump wasn't a brain damaged idiot spiraling into senility. It stops being pretending when every single appearance, every interview, every second of contact, every policy enacted, every opinion presented, and every decision made are all exactly what a complete idiot would do. He's not playing 4D Chess, he doesn't have some secret master plan, he's a pants shitting moron who's hateful rhetoric and willingness to punch down appealed to the low end of the bell curve and got them excited enough to vote.

[–] TRock 2 points 6 days ago

He's a certified idiot

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Fragile Egos running the military great. Thousands may die but JD vance's feelings shall be protected at any cost. The party of "fuck your feelings" everyone.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] niva@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 days ago

Not enough!

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 8 points 6 days ago

Because a military operated solely by loyal incompetents has worked out so well for Russia.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

If the snowflake starts to melt his mascara might run.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And what agenda might that be?

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I imagine it's "Expand the base whether Denmark agrees or not."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not relevant to the headline, but why the fuck would greenland want independence? Unless they are excited for digging up their entire country (which I would assume they don't want as they like the landscape as it is afaik), they are completely reliant on danish funding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Ohhhh nooo, anyway. Who is getting fired next? US firings became regular since trump came into the office.

load more comments
view more: next ›