this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
439 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

33584 readers
19 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DonjonMaister@programming.dev 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Stage 4.5: console.log() everything.

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And then the logging fixes the subtle timing issue causing the problem.

[–] V699@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Race conditions are the worst

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Good ol’ Heisenbugs.

[–] sickmatter@fedia.io 1 points 2 years ago

Especially if logging ends up spreading a global mutex around the log file.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

We have logging software built in, but I can never remember how to turn it on, so I just console.log

[–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Step 4.6: Get another drive for the logs.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

console.log("Does it happen here?")

[–] axtualdave@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Everyone always skips the last step, but that's where you learn.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

"I notice that I am confused, and thus that one of my beliefs is fiction."

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

How did that ever work, I've been there many times.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have some Excel VBA scripting that I've been on 1-4 for a while now, so there's a branch off of 4 that should be "fuck it, here's the workaround" or "that part isn't that important anyway, ignore it".

(it's actually not Excel that's the problem, it's the change to its call to IE that throws up a stupid security warning.)

[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago

Oh my god this comment gave me an aneurysm

[–] macgregor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Get enough experience and you just have a brief moment of stage 3 as you dive straight to stage 4.

Unless it's a customer/that-one-guy-at-work (it's a title, but there's usually a handful of them) and then there's this vast stage 0 of back and forth of "are you sure that's happening, run these commands and paste the entire output to me" to be sure of what they are saying then you jump to stage 3/4.

[–] V699@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I jump straight to step 6

[–] kriss0706@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

its funny i see this now, after spending 3 hours debugging D:

[–] DarthYodaX@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago

My boss does 1 <--> 2 with us over most every bug any of us has ever found. Ticking time-bomb...

[–] PtitSerpent@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

if (0 === 0) {
var_dump($test); die;
}

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 1 points 2 years ago

Ahhhhh, PHP.... 😭

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

if ((x != x) || (x == x+1)) then it's one of those weird numbers

[–] ShustOne@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

As true as true can ever be

[–] egeres@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Stage 7: Who wrote this?

Stage 8: Ah ok... it was me

[–] randombit@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One of the best pieces of advice I have ever gotten was to build diagnostics first. The time it takes to do will pay for itself 100X over the course of development.

[–] Celivalg@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 2 years ago

100% unit tests ftw

Hate making them, love them when they are here

[–] ZcaT@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Has it ever!?

load more comments
view more: next ›