this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
540 points (99.3% liked)

World News

47532 readers
3044 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Brett Wilkins Jun 16, 2025

Flight-tracking websites showed dozens of Air Force aerial refueling planes departing from military bases in the United States and heading to Europe on Sunday, fueling speculation of direct U.S. involvement in the widening Israeli-Iranian war.

Military-focused news sites reported that around 30 U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers were identified by flight-tracking software in what The Times of Israelcalled an "unprecedented mass deployment" to Europe.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 minutes ago

WW3 Here we go! 🎉🥳

/s

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

Well, so much for peace talks.

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I discovered this on another post comment but I think it belongs here more:

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=nCP3LZoxABs

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 26 minutes ago

Clearly moon bears being transported.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Wasn't Trump the peaceful dove?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

No.

We had a lot of "I'm willing to make deals with anyone" rhetoric from the Trump campaign that low-info voters took to mean he was anti-war.

But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn't significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter). Its all the same neoconservative think tanks writing variations on Project For A New American Century for the modern government.

The idea that you were going to elect an anti-war president went out the window during the primaries. Vanishingly few federal office holders have shown opposition to attacking Iran. Less than what we had in 2003 against Iraq.

Everyone from Richie Torres to Mike Lee seem on board with a brand new Holocaust in the Middle East.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone knew he wasn't going to be able to curtail democratic elections without the excuse of a war. This is on schedule.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

Good thing states control the elections.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 minutes ago

What happens when the federal and state government disagree?

looks at US history book at 1860

👀

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

We've got an election in NYC right now, with a pro-Palestine Muslim threatening to upset Trump's close friend Andrew Cuomo. Weird that nobody is claiming this election is being threatened by Trump, given that NYC has an enormous stock of Trump/Kushner accumulated capital.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 1 points 49 minutes ago

Or 50x the chances for hijinx, depending on your angle.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the republican run states will bend over whenever Trump tells them to.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

That's not true, they are protesting too.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

No US president is a peace dove. Between supporting proxie wars to police actions to declared war, they all end up getting people killed by bombs.

[–] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 49 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

This is basic dictator playbook, problems in domestic politics, start a war and problems change to foreign policy.

Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago) (2 children)

Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

The United Russia party has had a chokehold on Russian elections practically since the day the USSR was dismantled.

There's a lot more to their socio-economic dominance than Russia just starting new wars. RU controls the national media, they have deep roots in petrochemicals and finance and real estate, they're mobbed up, they have control of the military across the officer's corps, and they're embedded all through local government.

Putin could be the biggest peacenik hippie in Russia and that party wouldn't budge from its perch.

He's doing these wars because he's fascist. Not because he's doing 11D politics chess.

[–] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

Starting a war isn't really 11D thing, it is more like "me big army, me attack" vibe. Even the orange orangutan can figure that one out.

Russia has two exports, fossil energy and war. They know nothing else.

Putin and his party are one and the same.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 1 points 38 minutes ago

Everything you said is true of the GOP/American Right as well, and they do it the same way, through oligarchy, it’s just a matter of they having more time to ratchet it down where the US is just getting its official start, although it’s been working behind the scenes towards this for decades too

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 hour ago

As if any USA president wouldn't be doing the same thing.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

This is why I say Canada, Greenland, and Mexico are not safe. Added to the fact that all 3 countries have lots of resources the US needs.

[–] Donjamos@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 hour ago

If the US ever try to take out the Panama channel it would fuck up bigly international commerce. Basically only the US military is going to use it because no insurance company is going to cover ships going through them, and without insurance ships can't even leave port.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't this cause catastrophic domestic problems though. I think the US would tear itself apart trying to go to war with either of those three. Greenland perhaps less-so but still incredibly distasteful.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 hours ago

They won't defend their own democracy. They won't defend mine.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 29 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Search "Altlantic Trident 25"

[–] thecoffeehobbit@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 hours ago

Yeah we're gonna use like 1 tanker for that, 2 on a busy day. The 28 others are going somewhere else

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kayky@thelemmy.club 46 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Time to waste hundreds of billions defending israel while our infrastructure crumbles and our citizens still go without healthcare.

Again.

load more comments
view more: next ›