this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
299 points (96.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

35903 readers
1819 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 112 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If buying isn't owning, then piracy isn't theft.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 week ago

Piracy already isn't theft. At worst, it's unlicensed copying. Conflating copying, where the original is not lost, to theft, where it is, should never have been done and was only ployed by the big companies to make it sound worse than it is.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago

From God's lips, to mine ear.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But didn't you hear? They have a NEW version now!!

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago

It is totally faster and has radical flames!

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is fundamentally a theft of the autonomy, self determinism, and right to unfiltered information required for citizens in a functioning democracy. Loss of ownership is fundamentally a coup against democracy by overlords of neo feudalism.

Frame your argument as a citizen wronged by thieves and you will defeat the nonsense. Ownership of any part of your person including your digital presence to exploit and manipulate is a form of modern slavery; literally buying and selling people to manipulate and exploit them. Anything that has any potential to filter information, no matter how remote, unlikely, or illegal, is an act of treason in a real democracy when it lacks full transparency. Every digital device you use must be fully publicly documented with a publicly accessible toolchain for anyone to monitor or review. Trust as a policy is fundamentally opposed to democracy without exceptions. Trust is a trap of authoritarianism. Citizens are required to be fully informed and skeptical of all sources. For example, every mobile device made has a proprietary SoC processor and modem that are interconnected in undocumented ways. There is absolutely no way to know who or what is truly connected to these devices at any point in time. This is the real reason removable batteries no longer exist despite being more dangerous, wasteful, and an environmental disaster.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago

This is why all mobile programs have unlimited data and texting. Can't have you going dark on us.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your free trial of the Clock application has ended.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Today you can't start your car because you have no credits left.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Government uses bike path toll to great affect.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bike path toll? That sounds made up.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Everythings made up, and the lives don't matter.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

This should have been legislated against years ago.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Do I have to remind you how lucky you are to have a fridge!? Back to work, or they will unplug your internet!

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What? Whose gone to jail for thinking that they own a product they've bought?

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 week ago

Bricked switches come to mind, John Deere was trying to make self-repair illegal. Can't be long before someone decides users don't deserve their device.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

would you like to come over and watch a movie at my home theatre ?

i only charge one dollar for free all you can eat popcorn, a comfy chair, 12 foot screen, and huge sound system.

ignore the FBI warning after I press play.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Pirated movies are not something you've paid for. And watching DVDs with friends is not "illegal exhibition."

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

i don't pirate movies. i buy dvds.

and charging people a buck to watch "my dvd", though, is illegal up to $250,000 fine and five years in prison

edit: and no i do not do this

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So your issue isn’t that you don’t actually own the DVDs you paid for, but rather that you’re not allowed to run an unlicensed cinema.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder what the "license" part of "unlicensed cinema" is. Could it... Could it just maybe have something to do with... Not actually owning the things you buy, and therefore requiring a license?

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, let’s use my photography as an example then. Do you think it’s perfectly okay if someone buys prints from me, sets up an art show displaying my pictures, and charges people money to see it - without my permission or offering me any compensation?

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You sold them your prints, didn't you? They're not allowed to claim any ownership over the art of your photography, but they still are owners of the print they bought.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

That's not what I asked.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gary Bowser got fucked by Nintendo for doing shit to a device he bought. Got sentenced for nearly 4 years, now owes like $15m

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For selling hacking tools - not for modifying their personal device.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i.e. Helping others modify their own devices

You're splitting hairs

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

You're moving the goalposts. The claim was that people are going to jail for "thinking they own a product they paid for." Your example has nothing to do with that.