this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
271 points (95.9% liked)

196

18095 readers
641 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 187 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why waste time like this? Wouldn't it be better if cinemas would use vertical screens where a popular youtuber would describe the plot of the movie in like 30 seconds while talking at 2x speed?

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 67 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Or they could put subway surfers on the bottom half of the screen.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

What is a subway surfer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luccus@feddit.org 39 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

*an AI describes part of a scene in a movie, badly.

And the title is something like “HE USES SUPERPOWERS TO SAVE HIS FRIEND #MOVIE #FILM #CINEMA #SHORTS”. Also, the name of the channel is any two word combination of: movie, cinema, star, summary, domain or reels. And each upload is either 15 to 25 minutes or a short and the channel uploads something every day.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

And the audience comments could scroll by on the side! Brilliant!

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 146 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And also add a subway surfer with family guy funny Momentes for the ultimate goldfish experience

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 50 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And a live comment section. Or even synced commentary streams by YouTubers you can view on your phone via their Wi-Fi? You're paying to see the movie anyway, so they won't be limited by fair use.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

niconico-style comments that fly across the screen

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RandomTester@lemmybefree.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I kinda want this (live comment section)

am I okay?

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 101 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Look, I am the type who watches lectures at 1.25x or 1.5x speed or something. But movies? It'd ruin the pacing. If you can't bring up the attention to watch a movie then maybe you just shouldn't

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What if we invented drugs that allow you to enjoy any content 1.5 times faster?

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 4 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe that'd just make the content 1.5 times longer and 1.5 times more expensive

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 77 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why waste time watching an entire movie when you can just read the spoilers and know what's it about in less than 5 minutes?

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely not me watching cinemasins as a substitute to watching the whole movie.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Theaters and opera, too. I'm sure the actors will be willing to get their shifts cut by 20-50 % if we help them negotiate the same pay per performance.

[–] ExploitedAmerican@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Omfg most musical thester people can barely play anything with 16th notes past 120bpm this will not end well lol

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I hate watching anything faster than normal. I want bad things to happen to this person.

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

do you want bad things to happen to OOP at 1.5x speed?

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 10 points 2 weeks ago

No, more like 0.5x speed so we can savour it

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 7 points 2 weeks ago
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

this user, right here, what?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phantomwise@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If you look at old silent movies, they were played at different speeds in different cinemas and projections. There wasn't a standard way to play a movie, no "you NEED to play the movie at this specific speed or it will be ruined". I'm not saying the same should apply to modern movies, but I find it interesting.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

That is not true. There was a standard, which is different from todays standard. Which is why it looks funny being played at todays standard, but mostly they get digitally fixed and they look completely natural now.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I imagine in a few decades we might have AI media. You could read a web novel with a fewer or a lot of pictures, or read it as a manhwa / webtoon, or as an anime, or as a virtual reality 3D experience that is semi-interactive. And you could give instructions to shorten or expand it, or even diverge in the plot a little, or change the characters. More like the holodeck with a VR headset.

[–] QuincyPeck@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So anything except actually enjoying reading a book.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The book still exists, nobody is taking that away. But now you can enjoy it in different media forms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Maybe more like someone reading you a book while you can ask questions or give feedback. And maybe instead of just watching pictures / illustrations, you could also describe your own imagination more detailed or give some rough sketches and create your own illustrations to the text. Like a modding feature for books and you can share the mods with other readers.

[–] KAtieTot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

Hey google, is this media literacy?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

This is when noncreatives will learn that making good stuff is hard 😅

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The industrial revolution and it's consequences....

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

What is this the 19th century?

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I... what? I'm suddenly very happy for David Lynch, that he didn't live long enough to see this catch on...

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It hasn't...caught on? People have just stopped going to movies as much, and I don't think 4 concurrent showings of the new Jurassic Park movie at speeds 1x thru 2x are saving them.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Plenty of replies in this thread suggests it has indeed caught on. The part where people are watching movies at higher speeds that is, not cinemas showing them at that speed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Does this person not pay for their ticket? It costs 15$ for a ticket at our theater. Why would I want to waste that money by having it sped up? It's hard enough finding movies that are worth watching in the first place.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

The theater here does a half price deal on Tuesdays, two of us can go for like $12.95, it's a great deal.

Might be worth checking in your area, I've seen a lot more mediocre movies after we started going on Tuesday.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Quokka@quokk.au 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

YouTube added customisable speeds recently!

I find 1.4 to be enjoyable, but 2x if I need to get through something dense.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

I usually watch anime on 2x, but I struggle with other media at that speed, probably cause I can read faster than listen to words in english lol. I do watch videos in my native language faster on the rare occasions I do watch any

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How much crap are you watching if you have to speed it up to get through it all?

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

The dopamine must flow!

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

this person needs to beblocked into the Clockwork Orange device

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

For obvious reasons this will never happen. That being said, I do the same with most content. When YouTube I use from 1.25 as an absolute minimum to 2.0 a lot of the time. Average being 1.5. For movies/series I tend to opt for 1.25-1.33.

But this all fails when any music is involved - then I dial it down to 1.0.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

I can kind of understand the people who speed up audiobooks and podcasts. But movies? That's nuts. |

I wonder if OP was alive during the VCR era. I bet they would have loved the FF button. AKA chipmunk mode.

load more comments
view more: next ›