this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
59 points (96.8% liked)

Shirts That Go Hard

5278 readers
140 users here now

Share shirts that go hard.

Example A, B, C1 C2


Community Rules

1) Be nice and have fun.

Site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them.

2) No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content

3) No AI generated content

AI generated content of any kind is not allowed in this community; as decided by the community of July 2025

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've read and pondered your collective input from the other rule vote.

I wanted to gauge the community consensus on AI content in general on Shirts That Go Hard. Should we allow AI generated content to be posted here?

~~Please vote here >>> strawpoll.com/B2ZB9jYQjgJ~~


Poll is closed and here is the final results.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 71 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Simply, no. It's not 'fictitious shirts that go hard'. If it hasn't been made from materials, printed, stitched etc, it is slop that doesn't belong.

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

100%. If it’s AI, it doesn’t go hard. It doesn’t go anywhere.

[–] Beastly.gr@piefed.social 33 points 4 days ago

No AI. Nothing but real shirts. You’re better than that. We’re better than that.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

The less AI sludge anywhere online the better, in my opinion

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 days ago

I'll block the community if AI generated content is allowed.

[–] TheSaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

Remember kids, always say NO to AI slop

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 4 days ago

Don't want "ai" here.

I also wouldn't really want fake shirts made with Photoshop by hand. AI is worse though.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Curious about an edge case: what about photos of real shirts that have obvious AI content printed on them? My vote would still be to not allow it.

[–] g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

I would vote the opposite, if it's a real shirt then it doesn't matter what made the shirt content

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Edit: Oops, misread that comment. Was thinking AI on the photo of a real shirt instead of AI on the real shirt.

I'd reluctantly allow it, but it would be less likely to get an upvote from me if I can tell.

~~There would still not be a real shirt having that content, so what would be the point?~~

~~I feel the same about human drawn or edited shirts - unless someone actually created it physically then it's just an idea and not a shirt that goes hard.~~

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If someone goes through the trouble of ordering/printing it, buyin/selling it, and wearing it, at that point I'd consider it a real shirt.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Oh! I misinterpreted the top-level comment, and was thinking of a photo of a (possibly blank) real shirt that later had AI stuff added to the photo.

Hmm. A real shirt with AI Slop on it would indeed be a corner case, I guess it would count, but it'd only upvote if it goes Very hard.

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 2 points 3 days ago

Oh I agree. If it goes Super Hard then all this AI nonsense has been worth it, TBH.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Only physically real shirts.