this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
447 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

12674 readers
739 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 127 points 5 days ago (1 children)

All positives: public opinion not great.

Thanks, fucking propagandists...

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

This table is clearly cherry picked and biased. If you add a row "cost of me bringing my car", then it's up, up, UP in big red letters!! No thanks!

Edit: I meant this as a jokeeeee omg /s

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Edit: I meant this as a jokeeeee omg /s

In my experience, this community is really sensitive to anything even remotely pro-car, so jokes need to be marked more clearly than multiple exclamation marks! Haha

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Tbf, it sounded like a matter-of-fact opinion to my filthy casual ears until I saw the edit.

[–] stephen01king@piefed.zip 14 points 5 days ago

So your cost should overwrite safer streets, less congestion for people who do drive, and less noise and air pollution for people who don't even drive? What a selfish person.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

I know you're joking but is it even up? I haven't driven in NYC, but my experience in other large cities is that unless you're parking at a friend's place, having a car in town can be expensive and annoying when you want to park it close to your destination. And that's assuming no one fucks with it while you're away from it.

Though it does depend on how much the tolls are. Hell, parking might even be cheaper now that demand is down, unless they've started repurposing parking space already.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What is "brining" for cars? Is this a joke?

[–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

I think it's supposed to say "bringing".

Yeah. Bringing your car is more expensive. That's the whole point of the toll.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh god YES it was a joke 🤦I forgot the /s

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 5 days ago

This is the finest example of poe's law I've seen all week

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago

Public opinion should have been red. This is needlessly partisan.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 days ago

Obvious years before it was implemented, that's part of the problem.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I find the framing of the (potential) negatives interesting. Not worse, too soon to say, holding up

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

I don't think it's about framing and more about that's just what there is to say about them.

Worsening traffic outside the area was a main concern of congestion pricing, so "Not worse" is actually the best case scenario.

"Too soon to say" if pollution decreased is not really a potential negative. It has decreased but it's literally just too soon to say if it had anything to do with the policy or if it's just a fluke. It needs to stay consistently lower than in the surrounding areas to say, for sure, that it's due to the policy.

They also looked at the number of visitors in the area and theater capacity and found it's a little higher than last year but within margin of error so they can't say it's worse but also can't say it's better so "Holding up" is as transparent as it gets. Some business owners have said that it hurt their business, so there's that.

[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

should have been done decades ago. would have been quite a bit harder to implement before the tech that enables it to be done efficiently, though.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I'm glad that they included numbers and not just subjective interpretations...wait