this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
736 points (96.8% liked)

Memes

51642 readers
1274 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 111 points 6 days ago (3 children)

*and actively destroys/dismantles anything one could remotely be proud of having their tax money go to.

I'd gladly fund NASA and scientific research any day of the week, but nooooo gotta feed the poor poor billionaires.

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 52 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

but noooo gotta feed the poor

HUH?!

poor billionaires

Aaaahhhh.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Yeah, I did the same thing at first. Did the half head tilt thing and didnt finish reading and was like, uhm, am I readinnn that right? Oh.

[–] AndiHutch@lemmy.zip 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 days ago

My republican coworkers are complaining about NASA because they always flake when buying our products (we sell electronic stuff to defense related military contractors) because they don't have enough budget.

Fucking idiots don't realize that their political party doesn't even want a NASA

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

My city can’t afford housing or transit but just spent $150 million building a stadium for live nation. Free taxpayer funded stadiums for corporations to profit from, yay!

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago
[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

"Live Nation Entertainment is composed of Live Nation, an events promoter and venue operator, and Ticketmaster, a ticket sales giant. The two companies merged in 2010 and now control an estimated 70% of the ticketing and live event venues market."

[–] RedSnt 34 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

Okay but we all get that Douglas was the bad guy, right? OP??

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

He is bad guy, but he is not bad guy

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He was pretty alright when he killed that nazi

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stray@pawb.social 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the bad guy was the fucked-up system that tortured him into his behavior. He's a victim as much as any of the people he hurt.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Being a victim doesn't mean you are not also an abuser. Not all victims become abusers. We all live with the same fucked up system, but we don't all fall down. We don't all turn to violence and self-righteousness. Douglas was the fucking bad guy. Try watching it from his wife's point of view.

At the time of its release, Douglas's father, actor Kirk Douglas, declared: "He played it brilliantly. I think it is his best piece of work to date."[26] He also defended the film against critics who claimed that it glorifies lawbreaking: "Michael's character is not the 'hero' or 'newest urban icon'. He is the villain and the victim. Of course, we see many elements of our society that contributed to his madness. We even pity him. But the movie never condones his actions."

If you see something to be emulated or respected, you might just be fucked in the head.

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 4 days ago

I didn't say that victims can't be abusers, nor did I say that he was a hero.

People who've done harm need to be prevented from causing further harm, but it's important to acknowledge the root cause of their behavior if you want to stop future iterations.

I think that the OP is entirely a joke, but that it comes from the very real villain of systemic injustice that pressures us all to lash out. I think one could see the film as inspirational insofar as being inspired to take violent action, but I would hope they direct their aggression towards worthy targets.

[–] RedSnt 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, originally I was going to say I don't agree at all with his character, but the progression is so great, leading up to the "I'm the bad guy?" moment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ratel@mander.xyz 8 points 6 days ago

Oh damn, I've never seen this thanks for linking.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] RedSnt 3 points 5 days ago

I just don't get how this has a 6.5 score, it seems like at least a 7+. But maybe it's the rose tinted glasses, we were kind of spoiled for good movies back in 2002 when it came out, and most of the votes are probably from back then.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)
  • issuing currency
  • collecting taxes
  • suppressing evidence of child sex trafficking

One of these things is so outrageously unlike the others that it makes me kinda sus of whoever decided to put them all in the same list

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago

A charitable interpretation of "printing money out of thin air" is how they bail out corporations and landlords. Why even save if the game is so obviously rigged?

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

They're mad at #2 because #1 gives them all the money they need to do #3. So why do they need my money too?

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

All USD is printed. Taxes are the only thing that gives USD its value.

I have a problem with the meme playing footsie with the ideas that taxes are theft and money-printing is fraud.

These are common neo-metallist arguments. And in techie spaces like the fediverse, libertarians like to sneak them into the conversation while going “How do you do, fellow progressives?” before they start pitching NFTs.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 6 points 4 days ago

The world desperately needs more Luigis.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 12 points 5 days ago

"You forgot your briefcase!"

[–] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't want to be your buddy, Rick. I just want a little breakfast....

load more comments (1 replies)

Trump can basically print infinite amounts of dollars through the federal reserve.

As we all know, conflicts are hella expensive and often decided by who can stay solvent longer. The fact that trump can just print dollars is extremely problematic here.

I guess the necessary course of action would be to bring the dollar's value to zero, and use an alternative currency instead (such as euro, canadian dollar, mexican pesos).

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

And now your going to die wearing that stupid little hat

[–] Mniot@programming.dev 8 points 6 days ago

If you were part of the billionaire class, you'd be paying less. Sucker.

[–] obsolete@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

I can hear Iron Maiden's 'Man on the Edge' music.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Is tax 33% in the USA? or are you not referring to the USA?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Federal taxes plus state taxes plus property taxes (if you own any) plus vehicle taxes (usually in the form of plates and fuel taxes) plus sales taxes (on anything you buy) plus who-knows-what all else.

It adds up to a good chunk of the average working person's paycheck.

Edit: Forgot to add county and local taxes. For example, Cook county Illinois adds substantial sales taxes and gas taxes on top of state sales and and federal gas taxes.

[–] Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 days ago (5 children)

TBH Ima put Social Security in the tax section too as I doubt people under 50 are gonna collect on it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Hot take: I think any involuntary expense forced on you by your government is, essentially, a tax regardless of whether it goes into government or corporate coffers, and should be included in the discussion.

Health insurance being the major example, given that's paid for by taxes in civilized countries. Arguably, the insurance, gas, and maintenance on a car that many of us would happily trade for a functional public transportation system.

[–] crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Federal Tax Rates in the US 2024-25 run from 10% to 37%.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (7 children)

I am guessing that not too many pay over 30% then? Also that this is in brackets, so that only the amount over certain point is taxed higher?

I am still surprised that taxes can be so high, and people require so little for it!

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

If you earn $50-200k, they you're in the 22-24% federal tax bracket, but probably pay 15-20% Federal income tax. Plus 7.65% payroll tax (also federal). Plus 5-10% state tax. Some cities have an income tax. But yeah: 25-35% total tax burden is pretty common for middle income people.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

Part of the problem is that we, the people, don’t get to determine the requirements. Our elected representatives do, and wouldn’t you know it - corporations pay them off to siphon money to the richest among us and give us nothing in return. Legalized bribery is the bread and butter of American politics, it’s why things are so incredibly corrupt here and why we’re living in an oligarchy, not a democracy.

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Then after retirement and benefits it's anywhere from 20% to 50%. I'm at about 25% just with tax, 36% with benefits and retirement.

Depending on if your deductions are calculated correctly (you have to negotiate that with your job) you might end up getting a refund layer or have to pay, so in reality my rate is more like 30% overall. People with more expensive insurance or less tax credits and or other things on top of that are going to have it worse off.

I make half what I would need to be able to afford buying a home in my area and be able to make mortgage payments and still have money left

[–] crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

Most people are either sheep, or have given up the fight. That is why anything that requires great change either doesn't happen, or happens only when something impactful affects them personally. 'Look over there....Netflix!'

[–] Randomocity@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

There are also State taxes that aren't normally differentiated from when complaining about tax rates even though they go to different places. In some states it's pretty much the same things.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Me trying to take a dump

[–] neuroneiro@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Need an hand to help you back up? You seem to keep falling down.

[–] lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

1/3, huh? You must be a high-earning Californian or New Yorker. I don't think anyone else pays that much.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

In California as a single person, with only the standard deductions and not deducting anything else (no health insurance or 401k) you would have to make 210k to pay 1/3 of your salary. If you pay $100 a month in health insurance premiums and put 5% into 401k then you have to make over 275k to pay 1/3 of your salary in income tax

load more comments
view more: next ›