this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
460 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

17204 readers
1991 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
460
plumpkins (mander.xyz)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Well, I doubt they can get larger than earth, so I’d say it’s somewhere between 3,000 lbs and earth’s weight.

[–] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Unforeseen twist: Earth 2.0 is a pumpkin.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Do we push the billionaires onto the pumpkin or do we all go on the pumpkin?

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Waiting for an eldritch God to carve us out

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Maybe this could be the best timeline after all.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 days ago

Someone has to do the maths on the best possible nutrient, water and solar energy ratios required by pumpkins. Maybe pumpkins win!

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Mass. Whatever. :P

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 4 days ago (2 children)

C’mon, how did you miss the obvious: plumpkins?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We just have to feed the pumpkins a steady diet of americans and we could hit the 2 ton mark here soon.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago

Naw, all the toxic chemicals would then kill the pumpkins! (see e.g. radioactive Wal-Mart shrimp)

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Where are we gonna find 4 average Americans!

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Time lapse video on those things are a trip. They expand noticeably by the hour.

[–] AyuTsukasa@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I love the can for scale.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are they still edible or just enormous garbage and waste of resources?

[–] Busyvar@jlai.lu 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Unfortunately giant pumpkin taste pretty bad,

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago

we'll have to test that theory with a massive pumpkin pie and pumpkin and cream cheese roll

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Suppose the pumpkin plant could be bred or genetically engineered to retain the desirable taste of its fruits even at very large sizes.

Would this even improve the caloric yield per acre? Or would the bottleneck be the available energy from photosynthesis? In other words do giant pumpkins take a proportionally larger amount of leaf surface area, such that you're not actually getting any more pumpkin mass per acre than with many smaller pumpkins?

As I understand it normal pumpkins are already pretty high up there in terms of caloric yield, so perhaps there's not much more room to push it.

[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 5 points 3 days ago

It might be more efficient per acre, but it’s less efficient per person-hour.

As the weight goes up, the stress on the skin goes up. But the skin doesn’t go any stronger.

So you need to feed, support (literally) and manage them round the clock to control their growth and stop them from splitting and allowing pests and bacteria inside.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Pit them against the lobster church.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

Memory unlocked, lol:

🎶

Decomposing Pumpkins!

Throw it at that plump kid

Because his mom did

Not give us good candy on Halloween!!

🎶

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Fuck you, don't tell me what I know, The Atlantic.

jack o lantern carved with a large sawz-all blade.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I saw one of those around 2000 lb pumpkins. They are a beautiful sight. I want to grow one but I know I don't have the space

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Holy fuck, I just looked up the record. Not what I was expecting at all. It looks like one of those 700 lb. people who can't roll off of their futon. Even the underside is shockingly similar.

[–] SillyDude@lemmy.zip 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Every year in Oregon people cut holes in giant pumpkins and race them as boats.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Also, Darmiscotta, Maine... We went 2 weeks ago. My first "Pumpkin Fest & Regatta".

Pumpkin boats

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Chappell Roan taking the outside lead there!

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I probably should work on getting the bush type plant mutant into the giant pumpkin germplasm again.

The first tests were had a 400lb pumpkin into a 8'x8' plot. They split and cracked however.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

this is lobsters all over again

[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How does that work? Selective breeding? Fertilizer? Growth hormones? New growing techniques? What is it that's allowing these pumpkins to get bigger and bigger?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Giving farms water for practically free while private citizens have to buy it in bottles (from CocaCola or Nestle, who are also getting it for free) from the store because the water is either laden with e.coli (usually from the same farms not handling runoff of animal waste properly) or just...not there by the time it gets to them.

Or PFAS. Can't forget about that.

3000lb pumpkins aren't something to be proud of. They are trophies of gluttony.

We burn down the Amazon to grow soy...not to feed people, but to feed cows. We are growing water intense crops like almonds basically in the fucking desert. And we are wasting tens of thousands of pounds of water to make a 3000lb pumpkin. Won't get eaten. It will be on display until it rots. Meanwhile, I can't wash my car in the summer...but I can pay the carwash! I can't water my flowers, but the golf course can!

What the actual fuck is wrong with people.

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 20 hours ago

Sure is a good thing that you don’t have any hobbies that use any resources whatsoever otherwise you’d seem awfully hypocritical complaining about someone with a checks notes gardening hobby.

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Your mixing commercial farming with enjoyment selective breeding. The 3k lbs pumpkin is only grown in a couple of plants. Anything growing too slow is removed ASAP and put in a compost pile. Its just a fun way to enjoy the growing season in the middle of bum fuck no where.

[–] Soulcreator@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago

I'm not an expert in the whole giant pumpkin phenomenon, but it's my understanding that the pumpkins are generally grown by hobbyists for fun rather than farmers on an industrial scale. So I don't think it's a trade-off on our food system, where kids are starving in Africa because farmers are wasting their resources growing pumpkins. I think it's more of an, "look what I did" type thing.