Acamon

joined 2 years ago
 

Is there any options for better bluetooth management than stock android (I'm on 14 currently, on a Motorola)? Android does a reasonable attempt at autoconnecting, showing me the last couple of devices and so on - but there's not a lot customisation or control.

I would like to be able to toggle easily whether devices autoconnect, I'd like to me able to have a list of 5 or 6 devices that I regularly connect to, rather than just the last three I've used. I'd like to be able to set priority for which device gets the audio out. Stuff like that!

Many androids ago there were apps that improved bluetooth management, but now they don't seem to exist. Or, at least all the ones I found in the app store seemed scammy af.

Any suggestions? Do I need to root? Or finally learn Tasker?

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Sorry, yes, small probe on a longish cable. It's for measuring temperatures on various pipes and hot water tanks to try and understand our new wood stove central heating a bit better.

 

I've been looking for a zigbee temperature sensor that has a long (1-2m) probe. I can find general room temperature zigbee sensors, and WiFi devices with probes, but not what I'm looking for. Searching online just comes up with people saying I'd need to make make soemthing myself with esphome.

I'm not opposed to getting into esp at some point when I've got some free time, but I'd like something quick and easy I could just buy and have working easily. Anyone know of anything suitable?

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Mediknet felt like that for me, but I had good responses to Ritalin LP and Xaggatin (an off-brand Concerta, which was good despite Concerta not working well for me...)

I looked into it and Mediknet has a much shorter duration than other extended release methylphenidates. My experience was it started too strong, making me feel too racy, and then finished early leaving me exhausted. What made things better was eating breakfast first, and splitting the dose (take half after breakfast, and other half 3-4 hours later).

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, when life wasn't going well I'd sometimes buy a lottery ticket just to indulge in a fantasy of what would happen if I won. But then I'd find myself focusing on what would happen if I died and how I'd write my will...

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Totally. And eventually people get to the age where "embarrassing" medical stuff is so common that it doesn't even raise an eyebrow. Just be matter of fact about it, if you don't act like it's embarrassing then they won't either.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

As a casual suggestion, it's fine by me. I like the broad idea of encouraging people to upvote and encourage stuff they want to see more of, rather than focus on down voting stuff they don't agree with. But I suspect most people already upvote much more than they downvote so the ratio of 2:1 wouldn't affect many people's behaviour (although be interesting to see some stats on that!). And my prejudice is the small number of chronic downvoters would work around any rule, just like the freekarma subs on reddit.

So putting aside the technical difficulties, it seems like a change that wouldn't substantial modify general behaviour, and wouldn't prevent bad actors (although it might make their lives a little more hassleful, which isn't a bad thing). I think that's why people have been suggesting psychological solutions, because developing a lemmy culture where people don't care about points is probably less effort and more effective than adding ratios that don't change much. But it's not an awful idea, and if it was introduced it wouldn't bother me. Tbh, I'd be fine with removing all up /down votes and we could go back to forum style of actually writing what you liked or didn't about a post.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, as far as I understand it the way that fediverse communities work is that whoever makes and moderate them get to decide what they're for, what rules, etc. and then there's a level of emergent culture that arises depending on what users actually engage in the community, even if it doesn't live up to the name.

I can totally sympathise with frustration about what different communities end up being like, and being told "why don't you make your own c/globalnews?" isn't a simple solution. But as others have said, perhaps it's not as bad as it feels to you right now. If you've been the victim of online bullying (which is what someone going through your post history and blanket down voting everything is) of course that's going to feel awful, but the actual down votes are a very small part of the issue. Lemmy doesn't have that many posts, so I come across loads of low (and even negative) rated posts. If there's groupthink that leads to some of your posts being down voted to oblivion, it's not nice to see, but plenty of folks are still seeing your posts. And when I see something in negative votes I will often check it out just to see what's up, and sometimes it's something dumb and awful, and sometimes it's just a unpopular opinion. So while banning down votes might feel nicer, because it would mask all the people disliking your posts, it probably wouldn't find lots of people who suddenly agree with you.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I think if someone is sad and obsessive enough to go through a user's post history to give a hundred down downvotes... Then they'd probably also be fine with scrolling through All and up voting two hundred posts first.

I would imagine my ratio is at least 20 upvotes per downvote, but I still wouldn't want it throttled. A lot of my down votes are when I think something doesn't belong in a community, and I feel like I'm contributing positively to lemmy by downvoting inappropriate or dreadful things. If they were rationed I'd be tempted to just avoid contributing to 'save them".

If there was going to be a weird rule about downvotes, I'd be more tempted to limit them to members of the communities. That way people on All don't downvote some niche post that isn't to their tastes but is perfect for the little community it was posted to.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (2 children)

As people age their faces sag due to changes in skin elasticity (and also often gaining weight), this can lead to a "resting sad face" compared with perky youngsters. But, as a middle aged person, I've also started to notice that I often get absorbed in my thoughts and realise I'm sitting there with a thousand yard stare and a drawn facial expression I associate with being sad or very sick or very hungover.

But inside I'm not sad, I'm just thinking about something I need to do or whatever, but I feel like I need to consciously "inhabit" my body again and "power up" my facial muscles so I look thoughtful, or determined or something rather than a blank "my family has just died in a car crash and I can't decide whether to call the ambulance or kill myself with a shard of broken windscreen" expression.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The isolated, rural place I grew up did something like that. There was a young guy who had grown up here, but was born in Asia. I can't remember the exact details, but basically he got a criminal record for something (although it was commonly believed that he'd actually taken the blame for something he hadn't done to protect his girlfriends brother who was on probation or something) and because of some recent anti-immigration policies from central government, he was going to be deported back to Thailand (or wherever) even though he didn't speak the language and hadn't been there since he was a baby.

The local community were outraged and campaigned against it, saying he was a valued and responsible member of their community, then when immigration officers were sent they protested and prevented them from taking him. No idea how they came up with a legal justification in the end, but he was allowed to stay. And it certainly made me respect the place more.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Who was that? Or any more details? I'm intrigued!

Edit: do you just mean marx? That's less intriguing, not wrong, but less intriguing.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

That's an interesting point, because in terms of wealth inequality and unbridled exploitative capitalism stuff was pretty fucking dreadful back then too. But I don't think there was as much interest in the super rich taking control of the government, because the government didn't do that much and had never really been a problem for the wealthy (apart from that time they tried to abolish slavery...)

I'm normally a "folks need to work together, big problems need big solutions" European lefty, but seeing the horror of what a powerful central government can do when it's in the hands of crazy dipshits... It certainly highlights the benefits of small governments and localised power. Maybe this will lead to growth of some forces of progress that aren't the federal government? The question is whether after the inevitable crash and burn, the next government will be willing to introduce the actual constraints, checks and balances to not let this happen again?

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Been rebinging Warehouse 13 (dumb but I love it). It stayed as an attempt to trick myself into doing some long overdue paperwork - even doing it slowly while half watching show is better than continuing to avoid it completely. That worked for a day or so, but now I've descended to just cycling through savoury and sweet snacks and watching a season a day...

 

Back in the early days of the internet, there were a bunch of webcams anyone could view - sometimes a street, sometimes the coffee machine of a lab, and, occasionally, someone's bedroom or appartment. Although they were much talked about, I'm sure it was a tiny number of people, and probably not for very long. And because of crappy bandwidth, most of these cams were more like constantly updating image, rather than actual video. Tbh, maybe it's not even a real thing, but I definitely remember it being spoken about.

Nowadays obviously things are great for people who want strangers to know what they're up to, they've got countless media to choose from. And 'watching a stranger do mundane things' was packaged up and sold as reality TV a long time ago.

But I guess my question is, are there people still live-streaming their life - without it being a sex thing (like onlyfans) or advertising / shilling front (so, ruling out most 'influencers'). Are their folks out there just running a 24h twitch channel where people can watch them fold their laundry or doomscroll the night away on a poorly illuminated couch?

 

The current news has me thinking that, while the death of any human is not something I actively relish, most people feel a certain satisfaction, relief or, at least, less sad when someone like Osama Bin Laden dies, because they were responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent people.

Which got me wondering, have studies been done estimating how many legitimate insurance cases are rejected, delayed or otherwise mishandled, and how many of those result in deaths? I guess other industries are also responsible for some pretty measurable risk factors (e.g. air pollution). It would interesting to see some rough numbers of how many deaths the CEOs who choose to continue running these companies in harmful ways account for. Obviously, they are only indirectly responsible, but the same could be said about Bin Laden, he didn't fly the planes himself, he delegated.

 

I've seen reports and studies that show products advertised as including / involving AI are off-putting to consumers. And this matches what almost every person I hear irl or online says. Regardless of whether they think that in the long-term AI will be useful, problematic or apocalyptic, nobody is impressed Spotify offering a "AI DJ" or "AI coffee machines".

I understand that AI tech companies might want to promote their own AI products if they think there's a market for them. And they might even try to create a market by hyping the possibilities of "AI". But rebranding your existing service or algorithms as being AI seems like super dumb move, obviously stupid for tech literate people and off-putting / scary for others. Have they just completely misjudged the world's enthusiasm for this buzzword? Or is there some other reason?

 

I feel like I'm encountering weird little tics and problems with my android devices, and those of family and friends. Just simple things where settings don't seem to be consistently applied, or the os switches something back repeatedly. For example, my apps are set to auto update, to use data as well as WiFi, etc, but every month or so I go into Play and see that some random app hasn't been updated in weeks.

Or my friend only gets Signal notifications when they open the app, despite giving full background data use, turning off adaptive battery, etc. My mother uses an alarm app that needs to display over the screen for a feature, but despite me setting that permission repeatedly Android keeps turning it off.

Is this just anecdotal bad luck? Or is all the work to preserve battery life, control background usage, etc led to an OS where the user can't control things reliably? It starting to feel a lot like MS Windows!

 

(I've got a pixel watch 2 and moto edge 40 neo, and some jlab earbuds.)

I usually listen to music on my phone, but recently linked my earbuds to my watch, and the same music played on Spotify sounds massively better on the same earbuds when played via the watch.

I assumed it was because I had installed the jlab app, and it was doing a bad job of meddling with the eq. But after uninstalling it there wasn't a noticeable difference. Is there some other setting I can adjust? Any thoughts on whether it's something my moto is doing wrong or something my pixel watch is doing right?

Its a substantial difference (although I'm not enough of an audiophile to describe it) enough that I'm now mostly playing music via my watch. But it's hitting the battery hard, so I'd rather go back to using my phone!

 

This is maybe a weird request, but I'm looking for a way to send myself some information at a specific time in the future. Basically, it's because I've got a few sites that are huge distractions for me at the moment, and I can't stop checking my accounts, responding to messages, etc. My willpower is so low, and I've got a lot of important work right now and it's starting to really mess up my life.

So my plan is to change the passwords to my accounts to a long random string, then save that string somewhere that I can't access for X days. I imagined a simple way would be to use a site that would send me an email on a date, and the content of that email would be my random passwords. But my web searches only seem to find pages telling me how to schedule my own emails, which isn't what I need.

Any advice / suggestions?

(also, in case anyone is thinking it, the sites I'm trying to block access to are all linked to the same email account, and I'm also going to change its password, so I won't easily be able to reset them).

Edit: FutureMe is exactly the site I was thinking of, thanks lemmings!

 

I hear people saying things like "chatgpt is basically just a fancy predictive text". I'm certainly not in the "it's sentient!" camp, but it seems pretty obvious that a lot more is going on than just predicting the most likely next word.

Even if it's predicting word by word within a bunch of constraints & structures inferred from the question / prompt, then that's pretty interesting. Tbh, I'm more impressed by chatgpt's ability to appearing to "understand" my prompts than I am by the quality of the output. Even though it's writing is generally a mix of bland, obvious and inaccurate, it mostly does provide a plausible response to whatever I've asked / said.

Anyone feel like providing an ELI5 explanation of how it works? Or any good links to articles / videos?

 

And if so, how do they label headphones, contact lenses etc?

 

I feel like some usb cables are great, allow my devices to charge fast, connect to data reliably, etc. But it seems so difficult to find the ones that are good! I've tried buying expensive ones but it seems pretty hit and miss. Sometimes some cheapass aliexpress cable seems to beat the "good brands".

Are there standards or anything I should look out for? USB drives, sd cards, and the like have read/write speeds or different "classes" but usb cables seem to all claim to be brilliant.

Am I just being dumb?

view more: next ›