.
LastYearsIrritant
joined 4 months ago
Inspections won't help if the problems are inside the walls.
Yes you want independent inspections, but there's only so much they can find, even with the best inspection.
Shit, that's some movie level rescue.
Backed his truck up the building so the guy could jump out of a three story window without having to jump to the pavement.
Perfect bystander rescue. Did exactly what was needed to save a life, but not endanger himself or make the situation worse for anyone.
Love to see the quick thinking.
Core One has a slightly larger print surface, and the enclosure means it can print more advanced materials.
Prusa is likely going to continue building off the core platform, so it'll probably be more upgradable than the mk4s.
Also, I think it looks nicer, like an appliance instead of a project.
Older trees capture carbon better than young trees.
Why a mk4s instead of a Core One?
There's a lot of right answers, but a QIDI or a Core One would probably be my two options here.
You mentioned an IDEX, are you interested in multi material, like combining PLA and PVA, or are you interested in multi color, like with an MMU?
It's literally brought up in the video. Watch it before commenting.
Watch the video, it's more complicated than that from a legal aspect.
This guy is on your side, but knows the law backwards and forward on the subject.
If a pistol needs an external safety, it's a failed design. The law is correct in that specific instance.
I would love to get some real testing and a true answer about what the problem is. Unfortunately, Sig seems like it just keeps getting shielded from having to show what the issues are.
10 years in jail is what's stopping them.
It's REALLY hard to create a dead man's switch that works, but also leaves no trace. Even if you delete the script after it executes, there's probably backups or logs that show what happened.
Yeah, this is why people don't trust science. They look at the surface level of the PRESS RELEASE and then assume scientists are just making shit up.
There's a ton of work done behind the pictures and there's lots of revisions and changes as new evidence comes in. AND there is disclaimers on ever single "artist rendition"
Science is fucking hard, and the pretty pictures of the press release are just the fun parts that they use to advertise their hard work.
Then people take a brief look at the picture, call bullshit, then go smear them online.
Oscar 1991 (VHS)
I will accept no questions on this.