Oh dope, thanks for taking the time to write this out <3
TherapyGary
And now you asked more questions, but then told me to shh, so there are some mixed messages here
Gold
The restraint to not participate in the comments here is a marvel of human potential
I think you have virtue ethics and deontology backwards?
Edit: autocorrect
Revolution? Yeah, revolution can bring anarchy, but I certainly wouldn't give the fascists any credit, as I'm not an accelerationist.
Odds of revolution seem low though
Edit: also, to be clear, I don't believe any form of government is 'just'
Fascists will not bring anarchy
If you're interested in further reading, the terminology for what you're describing is:
deontology (based on the action itself)
virtue ethics (based on the intent)
consequentialism (based on the outcome)
I would argue that there's no such thing as "good" people and "bad" people, nor even actions that are inherently good or bad themselves. Someone is, in my opinion, "good" if I feel more positively than negatively about the culmination of their actions, intents, and results.
To be clear though, my opinion on this is unpopular lol
Wow, that got weird
I disagree with your premise itself
You seem to be under the assumption that I'm a lib who accidentally took "defund the police" too far. I'm an anarchist who believes we shouldn't have laws at all
On the contrary, corrupt cops should be called out.
All cops are bastards
How is demonizing someone for their profession any better than demonizing someone for their sexual orientation
Lmao, classic
Ew, copaganda
Oh shit new counter statistic just dropped
despite making up only 12% of local police forces...
I'm pretty sure the target audience for American Dad is teenagers?