In video form https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhEoIebL6L0
edit: invidious link: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=ZhEoIebL6L0
In video form https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhEoIebL6L0
edit: invidious link: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=ZhEoIebL6L0
Why not both? Filter support would mean you'd have to update your list continuously based on current politicians and depend on certain words being used in the title/body.
A tag would still mean you'd have to depend on OP to select the right one (or perhaps on a mod to assign the right one), but at least the amount of variables would be infinitely less complex
Ah I forgot about Mario + Rabbids. I did buy that one, albeit second hand.
And I've heard good things about the Prince of Persia game before, but I refuse to give them any money. Mostly due to their business practices, sexual harassment suits and other misconduct.
There's plenty of games to play and love, so I'm not missing much. Regardless, thanks for the recommendations, I know you're doing it from a good place.
Man, screw this headline.
Literally in the news post on Steam, it says:
What About Assassin's Creed III Remastered?
Achievements for Assassin's Creed III Remastered are coming soon!
So while factually an accurate headline, it's implying something else. More accurate would be 13 years on, Ubisoft adds Steam achievements to original Assassin's Creed III, with achievements coming to AC III Remastered soon too.
Disclaimer: I hate Ubisoup games and I haven't bought a single game since Far Cry 3
You can make an awesome game, if no streamer picks it up it will all be for nothing. Last year 18935 games released on Steam, that’s 52 games a day, being successful in that space isn’t just about making a quality product.
Yep. Best example I can think of is Among Us: 2018 release that got massively popular due to content creators during the covid-19 pandemic in 2020.
I do not blame developers for accepting funds to carry out their dreams instead of being thrown into the ocean of "let's see if our years-long investment will pay itself back". Epic grants guarantee that the game gets made.
If you want to play a game only on Steam, you'll just have to wait. Can't have it both ways.
OP, your answer is in this thread
Sorry, I didn't mean to say I was disagreeing or keep arguing whether the action itself was justified. I was trying to convey why people are up in arms over some troll mod
Or !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com which is the actually appropriate place to post something serious
The banned user has posted to that community already.
This is something that should have never federated, to be honest
I'm not sure if you mean this post or sdf as a whole, but there's already people talking about defederating from sdf because of bad actors
For all I know, this is an admission of guilt.
The moderator that banned them hasn't replied to anything, anywhere, except make this facetious post.
And how does this justify getting banned for a non existent rule?
So what is going on?
If your culture is to ban users for non-existing rules to troll them, you can stick it somewhere
Ah yes, kernel-based anti-cheat and "proactive" voice chat moderation (spoiler alert: it's still reactive)
Also the ability to pay $7.99 for "free" in-game money. The irony.
Doesn't sound like a fun update to me.