golli
Probably a bit late to answer, but thought I'd leave a comment anyways. For reference I've lost quite a bit of weight in the past and am now an avid runner.
In my experience weight is like 90% lost in the kitchen through diet and not through sport. Compare how much calories/h moderate intensity sport burns, which as a side effect makes you a bit more hungry, vs how much even a small snack or glass of suggary soda has and you'll see that reducing intake is much easier.
The benefits from sport are imo primarily better health and wellbeing from the fitness gains you make.
Gains will take time, however i don't agree that you aren't making process. Don't you write yourself that you started with 30min have now doubled that? That's the definition of progess.
I don't know about (incline walking) and if there is a recent hype about that sort of stuff, but in running MAF/Maffetone training is a very similar method aimed at low/medium effort with constant heart rate. Hype around it kind of comes and goes, and it's nothing new.
It of course does improve fitness especially in anyone who starts from nothing, but to my knowledge the consensus is firmly that it is not the optimal or most effective way to train. Also substantiated by no professional training this way.
The usually recommended approach is some form of polarized training, where you do high and low intensity sessions that target different physiological adaptations. One rule of thumb in that regard is 80/20, which describes a rough split in training volume with 80% at low intensity and 20% at high effort.
So my recommendation in regard to weight loss would be to keep at it with whatever already seems to be working, particularly in regards to your diet. And if you want to see more progress on the fitness side, then start to incorporate some short higher intensity workouts of any kind into your training. There's nothing unhealthy about higher heartrates during training.
The Deutschlandticket was 49€ until recently when they increased the price to 58€ per month.
Still good value, but considering this is like a 20% increase within a year of existence and the price shouldn't even be meant to cover the costs (since there are many other benefits it provides) it is disappointing.
Before even that they should start to pool and align their defense industries. But if you look how that is going, then imo it becomes apparent how divided the EU still is. Germany and France keep arguing who gets to do what in their joint projects, Poland buys Korean and US equipment for a lot of their stuff, and different counties are part of different projects for the next gen planes.
But anyways even if that happens, as long as we have unanimous decision making processes, a combined army would be to slow to react due to politics. As we've e.g. seen with sanctions
What kind of next level stupidity does it take to do this intentionally
Could it really be called stupidity, if they know nothing of consequence will happen because of it? Because I doubt there will be any.
With that knowledge and assuming it wasn't intentional, it is imo closer to indifference than stupidity.
That's pretty much me aswell, besides that I didn't even spend energy to try and learn others. Simple docker compose, simple ui and easy way to add services.
I am sure there are alternatives that allow for more elaborate setups and fancier things. But for the low effort I put into it, I got a page with some nice buttons with appropriate icons that scales to whatever screen size it's displayed on. Only additional thing I did was enabled to show some basic info to see if e.g. SABnzbd is downloading something, which was also super easy.
Why do you want a Mac? The only valid choices are aesthetics, brand loyalty or ignorance.
I feel like something got lost in the discussion here. I don't want a Mac, that's the whole point.
I want a device that is like the Macbook air, but without the crap Apple pulls. So with easily expandable storage, ideally expandable RAM and an easy way to run another OS than MacOS on it (i am aware that in theory Ashai Linux is an option for Aplle silicon macs).
Because i do think in this case there are more valid reasons than "aesthetics, brand loyalty or ignorance", simply because the Macbook air to me in many ways seems like a very well rounded, nice package (with the caveat of Apple doing Apple things) and the rest of the market doesn't offer an equivalent. With the Macbook Air M1 being 4 years old by now and options like Intels Lunar Lake existing, it really would be possible to make.
I didn't specify "non technical" as I'd actually like one like it myself and would consider myself at least moderately tech-savvy. I meant average in what many people actually end up doing on their laptop, which is browsing, writing, watching videos and maybe doing some very minor productivity tasks.
That said i would say that yes, even non technical users would appreciate a high quality screen. They admittedly probably wouldn't know to look out for it at purchase or what to look out for on a spec sheet, but in my opinion they would appreciate it during use (more so than some extra unneeded performance)
The demographic that is just Apple fanboys and they weren’t giving up their overpriced garbage no matter what.
Yes, apple fanboys will be fanboys, but the M-series Macbook Airs are imo are just a really great piece of hardware. Particularly the M1 when it came out and even nowadays imo is even priced decently for what it offers.
So far i don't know a good non-Apple alternative that manages to fully match the M1 Macbook Air features (sans the non-upgradable storage that Apple charges way to much for and that destroys most of the value proposition).
Ich finde die Tatsache, dass wir auf diese Art der hybriden Kriegsführung anscheinend keinerlei Antwort haben tatsächlich problematischer als Ding, wie unter der 2% Schwelle bei den Militärausgaben zu bleiben.
Da hilft uns mehr Geld auch nur bedingt, weil es sich primär um politische Probleme handelt.
Investment or stock communities.
Personally I'm boring and just invest in broad market indices, but I still enjoyed the discussions.
What I don't quite understand is how there is 1.5 billion in a single wallet. Or how are these things structured?
This article puts their total assets under management at $15.7b, which are held in different cryptocurrencies with ethereum at just above $5b.
So I am wondering how they have more than 1/6 of their Ethereum in a single wallet or were these multiple that were connected and got compromised through the same vulnerability? How expensive is it to have more individual wallets? Would it not be feasible to have it split in something like $100m chunks? Or any other more moderate size.