haloduder

joined 1 week ago
[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago

Everything is so expensive so the people exploiting us can make more money.

Anyone telling you it's so the business can stay in business is a useful idiot.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Useful idiots have been convinced that the pill wouldn't even exist unless these scumbags could maximize profit off of it in this manner.

It's why most dumbasses think copyright and patent laws are beneficial for them, not their rulers.

Hey, news flash idiots. If copyright and patents laws benefited the working class, we'd see the ruling class fighting tooth and nail to remove them. Instead, they fight tooth and nail to protect them.

I don't expect most people reading this to agree with me, and it's another reason why I think most people are useful idiots. If you're stupid enough to believe that life saving drugs wouldn't get made if someone couldn't own the patent for it, then you are a moron going to bat for their oppressors.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's always acceptable to kill a rich person.

They only got rich by killing and exploiting poor people.

Unless they renounce their wealth and give most of it away, kill them.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 hour ago

I keep saying, incels need to be targeting country clubs instead of elementary schools.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 2 points 5 hours ago

What is self-thinking? Do you mean self-awareness?

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 0 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 4 points 5 hours ago

I agree. AI would be way more useful if it gave some kind of indicator of accuracy, or even just saying "I don't know."

Right now, AI only doesn't have an answer when the goons who programmed it told it not to give one.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 0 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

What would make it 'ai' in your mind?

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 4 points 5 hours ago

That's really stupid.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 1 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, that movie is legit creepy as fuck.

It's a really good surreal kind of creepiness towards the end that I can definitely see having an impact on a kid. Stanley Kubrick was great.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 2 points 14 hours ago

None, but I saw Child's Play as a kid and it scared me for years afterwards.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I was extremely clear about this in my previous comment. If re-reading a few times doesn’t clear things up, I don’t know how to help you.

then it’s processed.

What would make the kimchi ultra-processed?

They are doing the same thing that the right does for climate change: they are trying to argue that, because the science isn’t 100% settled, we should reject it all outright.

I'm guessing you don't know how to read. This is a discussion about what constitutes ultra-processed food. It has nothing to do with whether 'UPFs' (the thing we're still trying to define) are good or bad.

And I better not find out you’re doing it for free.

Yeah, you're too far gone. I hope you get the help you need.

 

I've been doing a lot of research into Judaism. They seem to encourage asking tough questions and taking the answers seriously, which is good.

After reading a bit of the Torah, it got me thinking, why aren't there any references to people who could not have been known to its followers at the time? No mention of East Asians or Native Americans. Did God just forget about them when he talked through Moses? Or he thought they weren't important enough to mention?

Then it got me thinking some more. What about science? Wouldn't it be effective to convince followers of legitimacy if a religion could accurately predict a scientific phenomenon before its followers have the means of discovering it? Say, "And God said, let there be bacteria! And then there was bacteria." But there is nothing like that. Anywhere, as far as I can tell. Among any religion.

I'm not a theologian and I'm always interested in learning more, so any insights would be helpful.

Edit: A lot of responses seem to be saying "people wouldn't have had a use for that knowledge at the time" seem to be parroting religious talking points without fully understanding their implications. Why would God only tell people what they would have a use for at the time? Why wouldn't he give them information that could expand the possibilities of what they were capable of? Why does it matter if people had a word for something at the time? Couldn't God just tell them new words for new things? If God was only telling them things that were relevant to them at the time, why didn't He say so? Also, how come he doesn't come back and tell us things that are relevant now, or at least mention that he isn't coming back?

120
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by haloduder@thelemmy.club to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
 

It looks like the last verified contact with them has been in 2018. Recently a youtuber went there and tried to get their attention, but couldn't find them.

Is it possible they're not even still around? Maybe a disease found its way onto their island and took them out. It could have even been from the last visitor in 2018.

 

Since anyone can put anything they want on their servers, it seems like a lot of evidence could be thrown out in court cases if access to that information is not strictly monitored and audited to make sure the owners aren't removing or adding data.

Does anyone know of industry-standard practices to ensure that data on servers is not being manipulated in a way to protect or harm users?

view more: next ›