r0ertel

You have a lot of good points and I may have missed the intent of the article, but a knee jerk reaction of "lower traffic = AI is bad" is not helpful either. My point is that I frequently find myself hitting a page just to check a reference, quote or remember something. AI search results can be useful here. It's no different than how DuckDugkGo has a sidebar if the results are from StackOverflow. It's nice to get quick answers. I would like to see a fair solution to the content creators being able to stay in business.

This will be unpopular, but hear me out. Maybe the decline in visitors is only a decline in the folks who are simply looking for a specific word or name and the forgot. Like, that one guy who believed in the survival of the fittest. Um. Let me try to remember. I think he had an epic beard. Ah! Darwin! I just needed a reminder, I didn't want to read the entire article on him because I did that years ago.

Look at your own behaviors on lemmy. How often do you click/tap through to the complete article? What if it's just a headline? What if it's the whole article pasted into the body of the post? Click bait headlines are almost universally hated, but it's a desperate attempt to drive traffic to the site. Sometimes all you need is the article synopsis. Soccer team A beats team B in overtime. Great, that's all I need to know..unless I have a fantasy team.

You're reading this the wrong way. Why is the defense department censoring the media? What are they doing or planning that they don't want the media, and therefore the people, to know about? If this was a practice run for limiting news, it'd be happening in some other department first.

Electric heaters are wasteful. How about spending that energy wisely while also generating heat?

https://fedia.io/m/nottheonion@lemmy.world/t/2828343

(Sorry for the full link, I can't figure out how to reference an article on another instance on the mobile app.)

This is probably the best answer based on the stuff that I've heard.

During the first term, a local talk radio show had a woman on who grew up in a cult. She was born into it. She described her own story about how she learned what was happening and eventually got out. IIRC, her parents cut all ties with her, as that was the way of the cult. Anyhow, she described the process of "deprogramming" someone and it is basically along the same lines of what you describe.

Sadly, it's easy to "mass convert" people to cults, but deprogramming is a one on one conversation over a long period of time.

A port scan and then inspection of the ports is a great habit. Another fun thing to do is to set up WireShark to listen to what your fridge's IP address is doing. Who is it calling? How often? What services (ports)? While your fridge may have a DNS server, unless it's been pre-loaded with the internet, it'll need to query another DNS to reach the outside world. DNS is usually unencrypted, so you can see what it's asking to connect to.

Many of these devices announce their services via Bonjour or whatever protocol. It's a way for devices like Alexa to find out that you have a printer, interrogate the printer and then Alexa will tell you that your printer is low on ink and by the way, Amazon has a special sale, just for you.

If anything is unencrypted, check it out (with WireShark). If it is encrypted, there's a chance that you can hijack it with a proxy server. Set up a SOCKS proxy and add a DNS label (I can't remember what it is) to tell the devices in your network that you have a proxy. Block the fridge from the internet and see if it will autodetect the proxy. There are other ways to tell devices that your home network requires a proxy via autodetection & wpad.dat files in specific locations on your network. You can configure your proxy to log all traffic, like WireShark does and then see what's in the payload.

I've done this with limited success on various devices. More mature products like Alexa are locked down. Those cheap home cameras from China are pretty hackable.

Have fun!

I've thought through this. Would this new country have the resources to defend itself from an attack from the US?

What if this new country joins NATO on its first day of being a country? Would the US be required to defend the new country from itself?

A far more effective solution would be a "soft succession". Pay special attention to the section on economic leverage. What if California joined with New York, Massachusetts, Illinois and any other "blue" states and just stopped paying federal taxes? I can't find it now, but I saw a infographic that the "blue" states are the primary funders of the federal government by a significant amount. Without money from these states, the federal government cannot exist. All of this framework has been reinforced by the judicial branch.

This is already happening. In Minnesota, the DOJ is suing the state. This is a lawsuit to watch. If the legal blog from above is correct, the DOJ lawsuit will fail, just as before:

Federal courts have recently blocked President Donald Trump from interfering with sanctuary city policies; earlier this year, a federal judge stopped Trump from withholding federal funding from cities that refuse to assist with immigration enforcement, including Minneapolis.

You just described most tech stocks.

As Cory Doctrow explains:

the fundamental duty of every CEO of every high-growth tech company: explaining how his company will continue to grow. These growth stories are key, because growth stocks trade at a huge premium relative to the stocks of "mature" companies.

I came here to say just this. I used to belong to a hobbyist group that would reserve track time for races. They were timed trials for safety and had tow trucks and medics on standby. The best was when they watered the track in the winter and let it freeze overnight. Those were the slowest races I've ever seen. In addition to being safe fun, they taught how to handle your car in extreme situations.

Here's an example race: https://www.onelapofamerica.com/#!HOME

I'm imagining every strenuous lift resulting in a toot!

I think you're on to something. This could accelerate the movement of tech jobs to India & other countries vs just importing cheap labor.

In the past, when tech jobs were outsourced, it was just the coders. Lately, ilve noticed entire teams being outsourced, manager, project/product managers, coders, agilists, designers and others. Big companies are letting all technology be performed offshore and only the business units remain. This administration policy move could accelerate this trend, which could have far reaching implications.

I scrolled way too far to find this.