spujb
fully agree! especially the part about it only being in a single community thats a key fact i should have mentioned :)
Yes. We agree. The admin has a right to address the issue they perceive. And as I said right after, users have the right to know that this is the swift, emotionally charged, and overbearing due process that the admin may choose to implement.
If there were any written rules or good faith communication of instance standards I would not be making this post.
ah in that case i stand corrected :(
I certainly feel there is room for growth and improvement in that individual admin.
of course i don’t have communication with those who downvoted, but my knee jerk worry is the downvotes were due to the nonspecificity of the title. not sure of course but that is my thought.
here you seem to equate “users can post at a high volume if they follow the other rules” with “nothing the user does can ever be wrong” which NO one ever said
i hope the absurdity of this is innately apparent lol
so did that actually happen? and if so why would you complain about it as a volume issue and not a self advertising issue?
on the contrary it sounds insane to equate “posting with high volume” with “posting Nazi content” as though that’s a fair example you can use toward your argument at all
“people who post a lot are basically Nazis” ???? hello? lmao
if they are posting content that shouldn’t be there, report it. if the mods disagree, start a petition or encourage a migration. if you still can’t make change, use the block button. it’s really actually easy lol
This is a separate issue entirely. The fact the admin got “ahead of the bullet” by making a PTB post about the reaction to their action doesn’t mean they are magically immune from discussion of the actions that started things, that being slapfights and direct account termination threats.