this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
741 points (77.1% liked)

Memes

49886 readers
2634 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 104 points 1 week ago (8 children)

This "both sides" is bullshit when you are getting a train run on you by the Republicans...

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 week ago (4 children)

And the leader of the Democrats describes his job as "keeping the left pro Israel".

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Correct, but still not even close to the same thing. More of this "balanced" stuff.

Anywho on the plus side, he's getting wrecked in the polls vs AOC who's looking to take his place though.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting.

Obama dropped an average of 80 bombs per day on the ME and North Africa during his presidency. The number of civilians murdered is impossible to calculate.

[–] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

For a USAmerican(or any other person), their primary concern would be their own safety, right?

Unless they can form/support a major third party, they are effectively forced to a two-choice system

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Choosing not to participate in the two choice system is how you get a third choice btw

[–] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

What would the steps be for that?

I'm not USAmerican, so I don't know much of the base level stuff there. I think they have a green party or so. But are they a good/distinct enough choice?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

When both choices explicitely lead to mass murder its mandatory for any ethical person to do all they can to make some third outcome happen.

Voting quietly for what may be slightly less mass murder but certainly is still mass murder is a pathetic and shameful way to chart a course forward. A handful of us have more dignity than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The USA is not the world, and its citizens should start looking towards the welfare of the people their country murders.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you denying that the Dems are shit? Just because the Reps are worse and currently in power?

What kind of an argument is that supposed to be?

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What are you talking about the initial argument is completely insane to be begin with. I think Biden came into office and reduce child poverty or hunger or something by half as his first action.

We're gonna compare that to Trump destroying the economy, removing due process, open up national parks to logging, letting DOGE cut departments with corruption, invading other countries?

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Biden gleefully engaged in one of the worst genocides of the era. He should be in a cell in the Hague.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

I agree I think it's fucking horrible and I think Chuck Schumer and everyone on any side of the political aisle that upheld this should be in a jail cell too.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

100% agreed. I'm forgetting my history though, what did they used to do with genociders and war criminals? Something about a rope or a wall.

And its a little past time that the entire Democratic party acknowledge that what Biden did was genocide, and what Harris was proposing was continuing with it.

Dems shouldnt measure ourselves by what republicans do, if they ever want to win an election again.

[–] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol, while technically true there's a big picture you're missing... The start of his presidency did co-incide with some things like the child tax credit etc. that did drop the official measurement to a historic low of 5.2% in 2021, but was then quickly repealed by bipartisan support in Congress causing it to skyrocket to 12.4% in 2022.

In the US the child poverty rate had been slowly, but steadily, declining since the peak of the great recession... Until the Biden presidency circa ~2022 at which point it skyrocketed by the end of his presidency reaching ~2012 levels.

While technically true that "Biden came into office and reduce[d] child poverty [sic] by half as his first action." It ignores that immediately afterwards he did "destroy the economy". Don't get me started on 'removing due process, open up national parks, cutting departments with corruption, invading other countries' because also yes!

Not to say Trump is better (we can all agree fuck that guy and all his cronies), but Jim Crow Joe is/was also evil, you've just been tricked into thinking otherwise...

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for replying, I just recalled this:

https://www.npr.org/2022/01/27/1075299510/the-expanded-child-tax-credit-briefly-slashed-child-poverty-heres-what-else-it-d

Now we can say he failed but I can't say that specific act is evil. Palestine on the other hand ..... ☠️

Like, I get your viewpoints and you guys think I'm trying to bury any negative viewpoints of the democratic party or that I'm brainwashed. Which is funny to me because I hate the establishment Dems. I just think posts saying both suck and attacking the Dems aren't helpful because they currently have no power. The other party is causing a lot of damage and there seems to be no stopping them so kicking the feckless Dems when they're down seems weird to me.

I also think the democratic party needs to be ousted by progressive candidates that have a good vision for the future. I'm not gonna lie though I don't see it happening. The establishment Dems aren't gonna bow down. Also, I see so many protests happening and although AOC and Bernie have made the news I don't think I see the Dem leadership taking advantage of this and putting up a solid front either, like wtf is going on? I'm not sure it's the coverage but it really seems like they're lost.

[–] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The difference is the viewpoint:

attacking the Dems aren't helpful because they currently have no power. The other party is causing a lot of damage and there seems to be no stopping them

If you buy into the underlying premises of how a liberal democracy functions (liberal used here as a technical term, not as a perjorative) then the only ones who have the power to stop the other party is the Dems and they actively choose not to. They're neither down, nor out they're doing their job of controlled opposition exactly as they are supposed to.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I still don't like saying how they're both the same because I fundamentally don't believe that to my core (ie if they had all three branches we wouldn't be talking about all this current mayhem).

However, I think I understand your point and I agree with it.

So thanks again!

[–] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago

They aren't the same, one's a sword and one's a shield. The shield can't effectively stab, but the sword can't either if it's forced to parry instead.

I engaged because it seemed like there was agreement, just miscommunication. Glad I was able to help cut through it :D. Appreciate you!

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What are you talking about the initial argument is completely insane to be begin with. I think Biden came into office and reduce child poverty or hunger or something by half as his first action.

Are you having a stroke? I don't follow your point and/or syntax.

We're gonna compare that to Trump destroying the economy, removing due process, open up national parks to logging, letting DOGE cut departments with corruption, invading other countries?

What do you want from me? Obviously we agree that Trump is worse than the Dems.

That still doesn't make the Dems "not bad".

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You really don't get it, huh?

People heard that shit last time, and they voted democrat, and Biden won. And ABSOLUTELY NOTHING changed.

At the end of the day, the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, just like they did with trump, and with Obama, and with every single president who has taken office in god knows how many decades.

And still you're here yapping "oh noes the horrors, vote Dems".

Bro, the Dems aren't LISTENING! Get a Bernie up there, or an AOC, or anyone that the people actually believe will do anything other than feeding the same interests they have been feeding.

And if you're too thick to realize that, at least you're not alone, the whole DNC is right there with you.

After the train run on you by democrats...

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I can't deal with US politics right now and this thread.

I'm fucking Canadian and people upvoting this both sides nonsense is getting my blood boiling.

I thought this enlightened centrist shit was over with but people are bringing it up like they're some next-level IQ genius. When in reality they're trying their to push people to the right (whether they understand it or not).

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

whether they understand it or not

If such a thing can be done without understanding, how do you know that you aren't the one who has been pushed to the right and that you aren't doing the work of dragging others along with you?

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

When is your country going to return the land they stole to its indigenous peoples? When is the US democratic party going to stop supporting the genocide of Palestine?

If its people not voting for the US democratic party, rather than either of the above issues that "gets your blood boiling", you might need to re-evaluate which side of the white supremacist line you're on.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I’m fucking Canadian

So you probably dont even understand the full context of what you're talking about.

Arent there other countries political websites you can go bother people on? Try Australia, your fellow commonwealth country (sorry australians). Theres plenty of other places to be a touriust with strong opinions about other peoples governments.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

What does you being Canadian have to do with anything?

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

When it comes to foreign policy and making the rich richer? Absolutely. The only potential difference is on some social issues.