this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
1191 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck AI

2666 readers
431 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1191
skills for rent (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not possible to make you unskilled if you're skilled. At worst, you'd get rusty. It is possible that your skills might not be in high demand anymore though.

The only thing that would make programmers not be in demand is if "vibe coding" were truly producing a better product than traditional programming. So far, the only ones making that claim are the ones desperately trying to sell "AI" before the bubble bursts. It's true that there are some companies that really want to believe it. But, companies are always desperately hoping for something that can allow them to fire their expensive workers. It's rare that that works out.

[–] 000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's been aggressively pushed upon new programmers though, a whole generation who might potentially never develop skills to begin with

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

So was Mountain Dew. That doesn't mean people had to drink it.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are thinking to short term

This is not about you, but the next generations

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In that case it's not talking about "deskilling", it's about "not skilling in the first place".

But, those are completely different things. I was never skilled in riding horses, the way I assume my great grandparents were. I didn't learn how to use a sliderule like my grandfather did. But, I still learned skills that were valuable for the moment in history where I grew up. There's never any guarantee that a baby born today will get to the age of 20 with skills that are useful enough that someone will pay them to use those skills.

As for programming, it isn't some kind of nefarious goal to make sure that tomorrow's children won't know how to do it. It's an immediate short-term goal to try to save money by not having to hire people with specialty skills. If that gamble pays off, then it will be like using a sliderule. Kids won't learn it because it isn't a skill that's in demand anymore. If AI turns out to be a niche thing, rather than a massively transformational technology, then tomorrow's kids will learn to be programmers in whatever languages are hot in 20 years.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, it’s about deskilling the workforce. Not an individual

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That just sounds like a conspiracy theory.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't need a conspiracy to motivate companies to make you dependent on their subscription service. Their goal is not to deskill workers for evil's sake. They the norm to be using their systems instead of your brain.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I don't need a conspiracy to motivate companies to make me dependent on whose subscription service?

They the norm to be using their systems instead of your brain

Did you miss some words here?

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Might be, but it’s obvious that they want people to rely on their products and then sell it as a subscription. Like everything else

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who are the various "they"s in that sentence?

OpenAI wants people to rely on their products, sure. But, they're not in a position to "deskill" people. In the grand scheme of things they're just a small vendor. A random software company in Montana isn't going to deliberately deskill their employees to improve OpenAI's bottom line.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Large tech are all in cahoots here, their motivation aligns

Ms, OpenAI, google, apple. All need line to keep going up by making people increasingly reliant on their live services

I’m not necessarily saying that deskilling is the goal, but it certainly helps them.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

They each have their own services and they're competing against each-other to be the best / only contender. The goal is to come up with a product that makes them money. They don't care if it's used by unskilled or highly skilled people. And, they're certainly not out there trying to work together to remove people's skills.