this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
259 points (94.8% liked)

Fediverse memes

861 readers
525 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CabbageRelish@midwest.social 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It’s actually old hat. Users on r/cth (where hexbear came from) were catching admin bans for upvoting the “wrong” posts years ago.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 53 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I left Reddit because they killed 3rd party apps. Since that day, they've only gone on to butcher the platform even further.

Joining Lemmy was a damn good decision.

[–] formulaBonk@lemm.ee 6 points 5 hours ago

Enshitification drives stock prices. Only the rich care about stock prices and they have no interest in using the platform. The platform dies off a death of a thousand cuts… story as old as time

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago
[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago

damn good indeed! plus with a proper app for mastodon and pixelfed we've got it all!

[–] philluminati@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Its still not as bad as how Twitter works. If you wanna say “kill all the (group)” you just search for someone else who wrote it and then retweet that. Then if someone challenges you, you just say “not my words bro”.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Obligatory fuck u/spez (with a large pineapple preferably)

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 26 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Context:

Reddit will now issue warnings to users who “upvote several pieces of content banned for violating our policies” within “a certain timeframe,” starting first with violent content, the company announced on Wednesday.

“This will have no impact on the vast majority of users as most already downvote or report abusive content,” a Reddit employee says in the announcement post. In comments on the post, a user expressed concern that the new policy could make people “paranoid about voting,” but the employee says that “this would be an unacceptable side effect, which is why we want to monitor this closely and ramp it up thoughtfully.”

If it violates policies, remove it and move on. This is weird.

“We have done this in the past for quarantined communities and found that it did help to reduce exposure to bad content, so we are experimenting with this sitewide,” according to the main post. Reddit “may consider” expanding the warnings in the future to cover repeated upvotes of other kinds of actions as well as taking other types of actions in addition to warnings.

Now that there is Thoughtcrime territory.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

“Hey investors look away from the huge pile of porn we’re hosting and look at these cool content filters we’re adding”.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 4 points 6 hours ago

Porn, you say? 🧐

[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 6 points 7 hours ago

This reminds me lots of when Facebook started applying warnings/bans/etc retroactively to content without any context. I remember getting several wrist slaps in the same month for content I had shared a decade prior that really wasn't all that bad. But Facebook decided it was a problem and made me question what I was allowed to post in the future. It didn't take long after that for me to stop using Facebook completely.

[–] formulaBonk@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

Just another way to allow hateful right wing content to stay up while punishing users who aren’t retarded for upvoting Luigi memes and saying trump is a fascist etc

What else is new on Reddit? They should just pull the trigger and make an official bigots only policy like twitter

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

The exact wording seems to be "banned content", which includes a lot more than just violence (is violence banned in the first place, considering subs like r/PublicFreakout?).

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah tbh if it were just violent content I'd be fine with that. I still don't trust Reddit as a platform anymore, but I'd be 100% understanding of the rule.

Banned/Removed-by-Admin content, though? That's absurd. That's way too broad.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Guarantee something like posting a picture of Luigi will be considered banned content promoting violence.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Violent content" could also be videos of officer misconduct, and there's the whole can of worms of what "promoting violence" means.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works -2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I think it's advocating violence, and extreme violence (things like terrorist beheading videos and such) that are banned. Things like Waffle House fights likely won't meet the banning threshold.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 10 points 8 hours ago

I assume this is prompted by Luigi-inspired death threats to CEOs. If they are monitoring this so closely, I bet the FBI might want to take a look at those records too...

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

I think it very well could, as well as any other reddit corporate agenda such as removing content at request of pieces of shit who punch and berate service staff and then later sue to remove said content from the internet. It's a necessary distinction.

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (6 children)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

It used to be a word for people who defended Stalin sending tanks to Hungary in the 50s. It caught on in leftist discourse as a word for leftists who excuse illegitimate state violence, domestically and abroad. Though on Lemmy, like reddit before it, it's mostly thrown around at anyone who disagrees that the US used to a be radiant light in the world until 2016 or anyone left of Pelosi.

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Lol that makes a lot of sense. Thank you!

[–] RedSnt 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Since we're counting to ten:

Classic tankies are the authoritarian leaning communists, that is communists willing to use (military) power to accomplish their goals and will voice those more aggressive sounding opinions.

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Ah, thank you!

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

To me seems to be people that think that the evil imperialist actions of countries that claim(ed) to be Communist are excused by the evil imperialist actions of the USA.

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Got it, thank you!

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The nationalists hanging around in leftist spaces

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

You're about to get 10 different answers, most would say

  • Any user from the Lemmygrad and Hexbear instances, and some from Lemmy.ml

  • Genocide deniers

  • Pro-Russia and pro-China users

I think it's just a derogatory term for anyone that's anti-imperialism/liberalism

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Nah we anti-imperialists don't fit in to that

[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

See, I don't even know. The term is used so broadly. It's basically just "Lemmy users I don't like"

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Got it, thank you!

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

People who support real communism. Think the USSR and Communist China. They're called tamkies because they used tanks to kill civilians.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

real communism

How exactly do you define this?

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

In case you're wondering what's considered "violent content" on Reddit and how far they'll push this definition, calling the top 10 breakdown of healthcare CEOs "Luigi's List" counts.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 hours ago

I hate the uprising of the word tankie like the rise of the word woke. Just more language to make walls between people.