this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
125 points (93.7% liked)

World News

45455 readers
3511 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Just the females? Doesn’t seem equal. Edit: y’all get sarcasm, right?

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Women are welcome to compete in the open division (mens). But they wont even qualify.

[–] Airowird@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except when they do, then the ISSF & IOC eventually ban them from participating in Olympic skeet.

Just ask Zhang Shan!

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, that's just silly. Especially if there aren't any handicaps given like standing closer, e g. how they mix compete in golf.

Any non-physically demanding sport should be open contest.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Olympic performances differ by gender : they are not equal either. (...and yes, i know you are joking)

[–] hitstun@fedia.io 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OK, so hold up. This isn't testing if a woman is trans. This test also disqualifies cis women who have genetic conditions that give them masculine physical traits. This article gives examples of women's gold medalists who are cis but would now be disqualified.

We might have to replace the men's and women's categories with "open" and "two X chromosomes". Cis and trans people of all genders might be surprised to find whether or not they qualify for the "two X chromosomes" category. Particularly effeminate cis men might qualify for "two X chromosomes". This actually seems like a fair way to level the playing field, accomplishing what the current men's and women's divisions try to do.

I am a little worried about the idea of disqualifying athletes for having beneficial genes. This could have implications beyond women's sports, like being banned from basketball for being too tall.

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imagine putting in the work to qualify for the Olympics only to find out you're not a "real" woman by some arbitrary definitions. Michael Phelps has physical characteristics that gave him an edge in his particular sport, but people only tried to talk about his weed use as a disqualifying factor

[–] hitstun@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

That's definitely going to ruin people's athletic careers, but at least this arbitrary definition has some merit in athletics. It's important to say that getting disqualified this way doesn't make someone a less "real" woman. Women can get disqualified from events this way. That's why I'd rename them to the "open" and "two X chromosomes" contests.

[–] ksigley@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

That man has too many amino strings in his DNA that resembles fish DNA.

DSQ

[–] Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“According to our test, you perform sports too well for a woman” is all this feels like it boils down to.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or you look too much like a man

[–] wetbung@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe if you wore a little makeup. /s

[–] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Have you tried smiling more?

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 24 points 1 week ago

What about athletes with genetics that happen to give them athletic advantages that have nothing at all to do with sex?

Or athletes from wealthy backgrounds who had greater opportunity to train and condition than poorer athletes?

This is all so silly to me.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

*Get fucked at the olympics!

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's practically a tradition at this point!

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's interesting to see this comment thread getting downvotes considering that apparently in Paris 300,000 Condoms were handed out to athletes.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep. Bunch of people in their prime and in high stress? Oh you better believe they fuckin'.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

And in peak physical shape. As I heard one athlete describe it everyone there is 10/10 from the neck down.

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

But remember, men can have huge genetic advantages and they're just athletes. Michael Phelps doesn't have an unfair advantage of anything.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Like, to see how good they are at it?

[–] CheeryLBottom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Awe, I wanted to post that

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 14 points 1 week ago

Whelp, yet another thing I won't be watching/supporting anymore.

Good news, everyone!!

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

The men need to protest, and we need the names of the individuals at the organization who are still failing to stop this with each passing day.

[–] polycrome@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why can't we just have everyone compete all together and just have their gender be next to their name?

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because women would never see a podium or even be qualified ever again. That's why they are separated in the first place.

For example the 100m dash: the world record for women (10.49s) would be 7652nd in the men's ranking.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not the meaning of sex they are talking about lol