this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1767 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

13995 readers
2466 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] lena@gregtech.eu 1 points 2 hours ago

!lemmysilver

[โ€“] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So are any animals actually capable of seeing the invisible spectrums of light? Because humans technically can see them, since we make tools that allow us to. Suck on that, other animals. ๐Ÿ˜ค

[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Like infrared and ultraviolet? Yeah, there are animals that see those.

[โ€“] Shou@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And all the other stuff we yse to see celestial objects and communicate long distance. Our phones are able to see colours we can't!

[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

I've been thinking about how a species with a metal horn could evolve to use it as a radio and even a hive mind.

[โ€“] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Really wish talking about what shrimp see didn't remind me that in farming them females have one eye removed to promote breeding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyestalk_ablation

[โ€“] Sedathems@mander.xyz 6 points 12 hours ago

I am eternally gratefull the practice is forbidden in Europe in organic cultivation. It's one of the small wins that fly under the radar. It's still a long way to people choosing for organic, awareness is the start of every change.

[โ€“] Geodad@lemm.ee 20 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Technically, all the colors are fake. They're just the halucinations of a brain trying to understand the input from sensory organs.

[โ€“] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

That doesn't make them fake, in the same way that x can mean 2. You are merely representing a given value (in this case light within a certain electromagnetic spectrum) in a useful way.

[โ€“] voodooattack@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But is my red the same as your red? Hmmm?

[โ€“] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

if two people can both point to red and agree that it's red, that's close enough. anything beyond that is just pointless esoteric debate.

[โ€“] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

Some people see numbers instead/along with colors, and different people see different numbers, so I guess the colors might be different between people too

[โ€“] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree that it's pointless. I think it may be beneficial to humanity (eventually) to establish whether or not there is an objective reality which we all experience.

[โ€“] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

i agree, but that's a job for neuroscience, quantum mechanics, and psychology; not a pack of dorks on the fediverse.

[โ€“] Sedathems@mander.xyz 3 points 12 hours ago

it's more in the philosophy ballpark, which shapes the interpretration of methodology and the consequences, in my humble opinion.

[โ€“] Zacryon@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

But what if the dorks on the fediverse are scientists?

[โ€“] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

then by all means

[โ€“] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But I want to contribute to humanity in a meaningful way!

-me, a dork on the Fediverse nearly incapable of contributing to humanity in a meaninful way

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] Geodad@lemm.ee 4 points 19 hours ago

I hadn't thought about it that way.

[โ€“] sfu@lemm.ee 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No, colors are real. And you see them.

Pink isn't real. There is no wavelength of light that is pink.

[โ€“] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine how OP their colour perception would be if they did have that mental processing power

[โ€“] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Oh that explains this scene

[โ€“] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

I don't think of it as drama so much as docucomedy.

[โ€“] Wizzard@lemm.ee 12 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

But compared with human eyesight, they could still see more 'colors' - As we see (almost) the same white in incandescent bulbs as LEDs and fluorescents, they might actually see the component colors and their intensities.

Not unlike how we may hear a combination tone when multiple other tones are played, and hear the difference (or sum) of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

I hate that it invalidates this episode of radiolab, which is, without a doubt, a masterpiece of podcasting:

https://youtu.be/jibvu9BHV_k?t=795

i saved the video at the 13 minute mark where they do the audio representation of the vivid colors. still worth a watch/listen

[โ€“] baatliwala@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I need to use wherewithal more in my daily life

[โ€“] ignotum@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

Every lunar month, when there is a full moon, i try quitting caffeine

werewithdrawal

(I initially misread you comment)

[โ€“] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

I wish I had the wherewithal to use it more often.

[โ€“] taulover@sopuli.xyz 135 points 1 day ago (16 children)

The way mantis shrimp see is nonetheless super cool and interesting. They likely have no conception of 2D color at all, and can only sense the 12 different colors in general. Furthermore, only the midband of their eyes see color, when the eyes are moving and scanning for prey, they don't see color at all, which probably helps offload mental load for their small brains. Once they do see something, they then stop moving their eyes to determine the color of what they're looking at.

Also, mantis shrimp have 6 more photoreceptors in addition to the 12 colored ones, to detect polarized light. They likely see them the same way that they see color, so they probably don't consider them anything different than wavelength which is what we interpret as color.

Ed Yong's An Immense World has a section on this and I'd highly recommend it. The ways animals sense and perceive the world are often so different for ours and it's so fascinating.

load more comments (16 replies)
[โ€“] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How did they test if they could see color? Did they make little shrimp dioramas or something?

[โ€“] Donkter@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

They asked them politely

[โ€“] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The easiest way is to use the principles of conditioning. Pair a stimulus with a certain color light, then start flashing up different colored lights. If the organism is cued to the stimulus by multiple colors of lights, it means that they can't really distinguish between them.

That's how we tested when kids lose the ability to distinguish certain phonemes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ