this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1965 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

14122 readers
2938 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hark@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Hardware vs software solution?

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Technically, all the colors are fake. They're just the halucinations of a brain trying to understand the input from sensory organs.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

That doesn't make them fake, in the same way that x can mean 2. You are merely representing a given value (in this case light within a certain electromagnetic spectrum) in a useful way.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But is my red the same as your red? Hmmm?

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (6 children)

if two people can both point to red and agree that it's red, that's close enough. anything beyond that is just pointless esoteric debate.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I disagree that it's pointless. I think it may be beneficial to humanity (eventually) to establish whether or not there is an objective reality which we all experience.

[–] pcalau12i@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There is no way to "establish whether or not there is an objective reality." It's a philosophical position. You either take the reality which we observe and study as part of the material sciences to be objective reality, or you don't believe it's objective reality and think it is all sort of invented in the "mind" somehow. Either position you take, you cannot prove or disprove either one, because even if you take the latter position, no evidence I present to you could change your mind because to be presented evidence would only mean for that evidence to appear in the mind, and thus wouldn't prove anything. The best argument we can make is just taking the reality we observe as indeed reality is just philosophically simpler, but that also requires you to philosophically value simplicity, which you cannot prove what philosophical principles we should value with science either.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)

i agree, but that's a job for neuroscience, quantum mechanics, and psychology; not a pack of dorks on the fediverse.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

But I want to contribute to humanity in a meaningful way!

-me, a dork on the Fediverse nearly incapable of contributing to humanity in a meaninful way

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sedathems@mander.xyz 4 points 6 days ago

it's more in the philosophy ballpark, which shapes the interpretration of methodology and the consequences, in my humble opinion.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sfu@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, colors are real. And you see them.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Pink isn't real. There is no wavelength of light that is pink.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Clearly, it's light-ish red.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Really wish talking about what shrimp see didn't remind me that in farming them females have one eye removed to promote breeding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyestalk_ablation

[–] Sedathems@mander.xyz 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I am eternally gratefull the practice is forbidden in Europe in organic cultivation. It's one of the small wins that fly under the radar. It's still a long way to people choosing for organic, awareness is the start of every change.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Can't fix what you don't know is wrong.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

Anyone who eats shrimp should absolutely read this.

[–] Wizzard@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

But compared with human eyesight, they could still see more 'colors' - As we see (almost) the same white in incandescent bulbs as LEDs and fluorescents, they might actually see the component colors and their intensities.

Not unlike how we may hear a combination tone when multiple other tones are played, and hear the difference (or sum) of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Imagine how OP their colour perception would be if they did have that mental processing power

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So are any animals actually capable of seeing the invisible spectrums of light? Because humans technically can see them, since we make tools that allow us to. Suck on that, other animals. 😤

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Like infrared and ultraviolet? Yeah, there are animals that see those.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And all the other stuff we yse to see celestial objects and communicate long distance. Our phones are able to see colours we can't!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I've been thinking about how a species with a metal horn could evolve to use it as a radio and even a hive mind.

[–] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Imagine aliens attacking us but getting fucked because their hive mind works on the same frequency of radio or wifi.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Imagine airdropping a meme directly into the brain of an alien

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gajahmada@awful.systems 4 points 5 days ago

Birds ?

I'm not gonna pretend I understand the magic words here https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2019.0295

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They still taste good. So they got that going for them I guess.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'm not a fan, but that's neither here nor there. I'm weird.

I'm just not sure that flavor can be considered a positive character trait?

Maybe I'm stupid. Who knows? Clearly not me.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maybe you taste good at least.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

I also would not know about that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I hate that it invalidates this episode of radiolab, which is, without a doubt, a masterpiece of podcasting:

https://youtu.be/jibvu9BHV_k?t=795

i saved the video at the 13 minute mark where they do the audio representation of the vivid colors. still worth a watch/listen

[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Blue blue green greeeeeeeeeeennnnn

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

super super ultravioleeeeet

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I don't think of it as drama so much as docucomedy.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

They can still see true magenta though.

load more comments