this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
547 points (98.6% liked)

politics

23061 readers
3277 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] witnessbolt@lemm.ee 187 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There's no loophole here... republicans managed to take over every branch of government and are willingly destroying the constitution because their views matter more to them than America & democracy do.

It's usually called treason 🤷🏻

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

We call it treason. They call it, “owning the Libs.”

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's not "their views," it's their lust for money, power, and a White Nationalist country. Make no mistake, their ideology is no different than the Nazis. This isn't a difference of opinion; this is unbridled greed and racism finally given unchecked powet.

[–] witnessbolt@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

From the court's mouth itself:

"It is difficult in some cases to get to the very heart of the matter. But in this case, it is not hard at all. The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order. Further, it claims in essence that because it has rid itself of custody that there is nothing to be done. 

This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans removed far from our courthouses still hold dear."

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca4.178400/gov.uscourts.ca4.178400.8.0.pdf

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We're also clearly compromised by Russia. We thought the cold war was over and we won, but turns out we actually lost in the end, and treason was the cause.

[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago

I literally can't wait until we can act on that fact internally.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 89 points 4 days ago

Throwing the game board against the wall, swallowing your opponent's pieces, and calling the game store owner a slur is not a "loophole." It is the brazen and willful destruction of the social contract that makes the game work.

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 59 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not a loophole. It is treason. All who enable treason are also guilty of it. The Liberty tree must be watered if we are to survive. Defend The Constitution. Defend Our Republic.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah I was like wtf you mean ‘loophole’?

Just use this one trick to become hitler 2.0! You won’t believe no. 7? Seriously? This is treason, blatantly unconstitutional, and all the gop are at best complicit

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah I was like wtf you mean ‘loophole’?

It’s not really a loop hope if you straight violate the Constitution and get away with it.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 3 days ago

Guns aren't allowed on planes. If you sneak one in you'll have a lot of leverage.

load more comments (1 replies)

Indeed. The law doesn't protect people. People protect the law.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 69 points 4 days ago (3 children)

His admin has started saying if people criticize this, it means they're supporting terrorism...

Which makes them a terrorist too...

And if you criticize that, back to step 1.

trump just said on a hot mic to a room for a laughter he's "sending homegrown's next".

Which means disappearing American citizens to a death camp.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I wonder when people are going to wake the fuck up and realize he's literally put us in a position where it's us or him.
His existence is a threat to everyone else's.

They're a bunch of cowards waiting for someone else to throw the first punch

[–] rishado@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Never. This country will become Idiocracy before people revolt

[–] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

The country will become the Qax Occupation from the Xeelee Sequence before people revolt.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Idiocracy would be a vast improvement. Frankly, comments like yours represent being in denial of how bad the situation actually is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Free Kilmar Abrego Garcia. I am aiding and abetting.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

First, they came for the "terrorists", and I said nothing, because I am not a terrorist.

Then, they came for the "illegal immigrants"..

While this is definitely an escalation, and a dangerous one that should be called out and fought. I want to point out that American citizens have had NO due process and NO rights on Guantanamo Bay ever since Bush Jr started disappearing people and flying them over there under the guise of terrorism accusations.

These are US citizens who were abducted, taken out of country, and not even allowed a lawyer or told what their charges are, beaten and tortured - that the courts decided that was all more or less acceptable for, and further that it was also acceptable to be detained indefinitely.

Trump is a symptom, he is not the disease.

https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/court-rules-guantanamo-detainees-are-not-entitled-due-process

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The Bush administration abrogated due process, but we might have been able to move past it as a shameful anomaly in our history perpetrated by one out-of-control political faction. But then instead of prosecuting the offenders, or at least disavowing their actions, the Obama administration doubled down on it! It decided that American citizens could be killed on the basis of an accusation. It cemented the destruction of due process as a bipartisan principle of American government.

The Turd Reich might be speed-running the course, but it's just using the tools that past administrations laid out for it.

[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Yes, he is a symptom, but he's also morphing the disease at breakneck speed to encompass anyone who isn't an able-bodied white male. I'm not fluent in diseases, so I don't know what I'm talking about but it sure as hell seems more than just a symptom.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's not a "loophole". It's just straight up illegal.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

no don't you remember when they said a president cant do anything illegal?

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What they said, was that a president can't be prosecuted for "official acts" as president. Not that everything they do is legal.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's not what happended.

The Supreme Court refused to prosecute Trump (for a blatantly illegal act) and ruled that he was immune to prosecution for "official acts" which they refused to define.

Then they slow walked the case back to a lower court - deliberately - so the determination was not made until after the election.

Then in a state court, Trump was convicted, but the judge delared there was no penalty "because only a federal court could apply punishment".

Then a couple of days later the DoJ dopped the case because "the president is immune from prosecution".

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

The Supreme Court refused to prosecute Trump (for a blatantly illegal act) and ruled that he was immune to prosecution for "official acts" which they refused to define.

That's what I said.

Then they slow walked the case back to a lower court - deliberately - so the determination was not made until after the election.

That's not what delayed the case. The special prosecutor had to redefine the charges, in order to comply with the latest ruling, by specifying which ones were not included in Trump's "official duties as president". They were allowed to prosecute him for those...but inevitably ran out of time before they could proceed.

*Then in a state court, Trump was convicted, but the judge delared there was no penalty "because only a federal court could apply punishment".

Then a couple of days later the DoJ dopped the case because "the president is immune from prosecution".*

That's because the election happened, and it is long-standing precedent that a sitting president can't be prosecuted...as long as he's in office. They can and most likely still will, return that case to court, as soon as he's out of office.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Pretty sure he's not flying the planes.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

It's not a loophole, it's what MAGA have been humping their Trump waifu pillows about.

This is what America voted for. There wasn't enough Americans who cared to stop it from happening.

The America people knew is now gone forever. Trump is king for life and people on both sides will need to die to set things right. This will not be corrected by voting.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All forces of enforcement of laws being created by one branch or interpreted by another being basically under the third, which incidentally is the one branch with an all powerful executive means the whole checks and balances was flawed from the get go, and assumed way too much good faith leadership, IMO

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The current fascist takeover proves it assumed too much good faith. Not an opinion, but a fact! Who knew giving only one branch the power to actually enforce things was a bad idea?

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Right? I mean hindsight is 20/20 and all that, but come on...

Now it means technically you'd need some kind of shared enforcement accountability - but how to make any congress-controlled or judicial-controlled enforcement group big enough to compete with the US army when push comes to shove.... 🤷‍♂️

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Making something disappear isn't enough; you have to bring it back. That's why every magic trick has a third act, the hardest part.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The prestige, if you will.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 9 points 4 days ago

Are you watching closely?

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 days ago (4 children)

That's not it

If the American people and all it's institutions and politicians, academics and public leaders all just stand aside and do little or nothing ... then they will lose their country.

A country is not lost because of one man .... it's lost because everyone just gave up and allowed it to be lost

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I think a big part of the problem is that we've made a place that isn't worth saving long before Trump came along to loot its corpse.

Let's go back to normal so the normal politicians can tell us the economy is great as we live in subsistence with no time or wage to live lives, where we're murdered for private profit with government's blessing, where millions of Americans die of homelessness as other Americans condemn their very existence for lowering property values. Trump is dandy with all that, but that's been the US under both parties my entire life.

We haven't lived in a society for as long as most everyone here has been alive, just a rigged competition against one another to the death for capitalist scraps.

Then you tell us the Fascists are here and we should... Risk our lives to... save that cesspool of avarice and casual sociopathy? Because people other than the poors are in the shit now?

This is the consequence of the hyperindividualist and avarice stoking values of the US, values our people are still miles away from abandoning no matter how much they get hurt by it, because they want to be a big winnah one day. We made a place where it was everyone out for themselves. Those values poisoned any sense of nobility towards this cesspool.

Here's a dark reality, not individually but as a nation, given our actions and practiced values? Donald Trump, who I voted against out of harm reduction for the record, is the PERFECT representative of the United States. It's like the US took human form. He's an accurate caricature of all we are, all we value, and all we idolize in practice.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

He's an accurate caricature of all we are, all we value, and all we idolize in practice.

Not to me though. To me he symbolizes a raging brain tumor

[–] sigmabot@crazypeople.online 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

theres no legal recourse so id love to hear what you think they should do?

if the laws dont apply to that one man, then yes the country can be lost because of him - and it has been. this turd needs to be flushed at this point.

[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean he's fragrantly ignoring a supreme court order. at this point law enforcement agencies are complicit for not doing anything. I really think there are no boundaries left for trump to increase his personal power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Illegal recourse, obviously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The country as we know it is lost regardless. Whether it collapses by despot or by bloody civil war, there's no going back to the ways things were.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

lol, any one who didn't already figured it out when the supreme court literally said that trump is above the law in 2024 is just not thinking right.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 3 days ago
[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 3 days ago

ah, the "i have a gun" loophole

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The way powers are divided according to the constitution does not work and it never did because the only constraint was the assumption that the president would have honor and not abuse it... Time for a new one

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Well, no, not really. The Constitution was drafted illegally, and basically forced on the population. And the entire purpose of doing all that? To give the federal government more power and control.

This foolish idea that the people who drafted the Constitution did so with any sort of noble ideals is a lie. It was a power grab, plain and simple.

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately, it's extremely American. We just thought we were better.

load more comments
view more: next ›