this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
621 points (99.7% liked)

Today I Learned

23244 readers
990 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Cox_(police_officer)

In the early 1990s when Cox joined the Boston Police Department (BPD), crime was high in minority neighborhoods, and among BPD officers, loyalty overruled training, resulting in widespread brutality and a code of silence. BPD officers frequently used stop and frisk tactics on black men and women, and beat black men with impunity. Lying under oath was common. A mayoral blue-ribbon commission to reform the police and a permanent injunction placed by a judge had both failed to change police culture. As a plainclothes officer, Cox was mistaken for a suspect and briefly beaten while still in training, and once purposefully hit by a police vehicle and pinned to a wall. He recovered quickly both times so did not file complaints.

In 1995, Cox's car was at the front of a high-speed chase which had involved several cars from the BPD and other departments. Cox continued the chase on foot, but was again mistaken for a suspect and this time badly beaten by four officers and hospitalized, suffering a serious brain injury. After the officers realized his identity, they quickly abandoned him to bleed on the sidewalk, and he learned only from newspaper reports that they had failed to report the incident. Cox began receiving harassing phone calls from other officers even before he had decided whether to file a complaint. A lawsuit ultimately led to BPD settling with Cox for $900,000 in damages, as well as $400,000 in attorneys' fees. No officer admitted to the beating. Following the battle in court, three of the officers were eventually fired, but one, Dave Williams, successfully sued for unjust termination and was returned to the service in 2006. Williams was again fired for brutality in 2009, and again reinstated.

In July 2022, Cox was announced as the incoming commissioner of the Boston police by Mayor of Boston Michelle Wu. He was officially sworn in on August 15, 2022.

What an absolute shitshow.

Edit: More info:

https://www.bu.edu/articles/2023/boston-police-commissioner-michael-cox/ (Boston University Alumni Magazine)

Excerpts from this article (a very long read)

Michael A. Cox, Sr., was laser-focused on the suspect running away from him. It was a freezing night in January 1995, and Cox—with a phalanx of fellow Boston police officers behind him—was chasing a car of homicide suspects through the streets of Dorchester and Mattapan and into a cul-de-sac that ended at a fence.

Cox’s target jumped the fence and kept running. Cox, a plainclothes officer at the time, was right behind him when he felt a sharp crack to the back of his head.

He fell to the ground and more blows followed—to his forehead, his ribs, his face. Other police officers, who had been farther back during the car chase, had mistaken Cox, a Black officer dressed in street clothes, for a suspect. Officers surrounded him, kicking and punching, until one of them noticed his police badge under his jacket.

“Oh my God,” one of the officers breathed. Cox passed out. There was a long stretch of silence before anyone called for an ambulance.

While Cox was shocked by the viciousness of the beating, he could almost understand how officers might have mistaken his identity. Almost. It was dark, his badge was under his parka, the chase had been intense, and sometimes in police work, a split-second decision means the difference between life and death. What he couldn’t understand—and still can’t—is the lie that followed.

His fellow police officers closed ranks. They told his wife that Cox had slipped on a patch of ice. They wrote police reports that obscured what actually happened. Cox spent six months recovering from the most acute of his injuries. He spent four years waiting, and eventually demanding, in the form of a civil lawsuit, for some acknowledgment of what happened to him. He expected, if not justice, then at least an apology.

Throughout all this, Cox was threatened, harassed, made a pariah in the department. But he never left. He stayed on the force, his presence a testament to a dogged determination to keep doing a job he loves.

“I was thinking, ‘Why would I want to leave this job because some knuckleheads that maybe shouldn’t have been on the job in the first place are trying to force me out?’” says Cox. “So, I chose to stay.”

As he lay in bed at home recuperating from the beating, Cox waited for an apology. He expected to hear from the officers who were responsible—or, at the very least, some acknowledgment from department brass. His belief in justice gave him confidence that the officers who mistook him, who hit him and left him out to dry, would do the right thing. Cox believed that right would win out over wrong.

But the silence stretched on. Instead of offering an apology, officers wrote false or misleading reports that downplayed Cox’s injuries to mere clumsiness, Lehr writes in his book The Fence: A Police Cover-Up Along Boston’s Racial Divide, which he based on testimony, court documents, and interviews with those involved. Boston police investigators were similarly stonewalled: almost every officer they interviewed from that night said they hadn’t seen anything and didn’t know anything.

“I just don’t understand how I can be dehumanized in that way,” Cox says in a recent interview. “And to have no one understand, and no one stand up for me? I was struggling.”

His family urged him to quit the force and go public. Local activists and advocates called his house to let him know they were ready when he was. At the same time, the message he was getting from his department was: Let it go. Don’t make this a messy public affair.

“There was certainly a period of time when I thought about leaving,” Cox says. “A lot of people thought that I should leave. But I’ll be honest with you: when I came on the job, I wanted to help people. I loved the job, and I worked really hard. I was an active police officer, actively involved in busting up gangs, arresting real criminals, murderers—things of that nature. I really felt that I was doing God’s work, so to speak.”

So, Cox found a third way. He sued the city and several officers for violating his civil rights. He was ostracized from the department when he did, but he remained on the force.

And in August 2022, nearly 30 years later, Michael Cox, 57, was appointed commissioner of the Boston Police Department.

Wow this is just...

Idk how people even put up with this.

I hope this guy tries to do some actual reform with his position, given what he went through, but I don't have high hopes given that... gestures broadly at US law enforcement nationwide

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 85 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's in the post, but I'm gonna call it out again:

A lawsuit ultimately led to BPD settling with Cox for $900,000 in damages, as well as $400,000 in attorneys' fees.[3] No officer admitted to the beating. Following the battle in court, three of the officers were eventually fired, but one, Dave Williams, successfully sued for unjust termination and was returned to the service in 2006. Williams was again fired for brutality in 2009, and again reinstated. As of 2023, Williams is assigned to domestic violence cases.

What the mother fucking fuck.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, sounds wild, until you realize that the police are a civic religion and the Federal Government 100% supports this kind of activity. Hell, everyone involved in Uvalde got reelected.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Democracy has a problem that nobody actually wants to serve… I do a lot of work with community orgs and it’s exactly the same: plenty of people “want to help” but when it comes to committee/board elections nobody is willing to step up

I’d wager the exact same is true for the various elected police positions in the US, and to a similar degree politics… so you’re just left with sham elections among people that nobody actually wants

[–] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No, we have a selection process issue. There is a legally permitted cap on IQ requirements.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836

As for politics, you might not see every failure because success is purchased through lobbying and campaigning. It's not about willingness. We've seen what people are willing to do.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not about willingness. We've seen what people are willing to do.

having worked in government, it takes sometimes years to even do minor things… most people are “willing” in that they’ll spend a few weekends… few people are willing to spend years of their life for a result that’s “well i guess that’s better than nothing”

people are willing as long as they see quick results otherwise they get bored and move on to another cause…

we can see exactly this all over the fediverse: people up in arms and then when some minor court victory happens or some report gets issued everyone is up in arms that we didn’t move straight to arresting people… i’m not saying that there doesn’t need to be some kind of emergency intervention right now to combat the extralegal shit that’s happening, but it shows that if results aren’t immediate, people kinda just argue that a step in the process isn’t good enough

government should never achieve quick results because quick results means courts and citizens can’t keep up and push back… slow government is a feature (though stalled government as the US seems to have most of the time is certainly not)

process and precedent help to patch the holes so these things don’t happen again

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The average cop is around 104 IQ. You need to be like 30+ points lower before empathy and morality are affected.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago

"unjust termination"

Wtf‽ Not only would it be justified, it would be fucking rational!

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

America is a 340 million people dressed in a gimp suit.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 135 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dave Williams, successfully sued for unjust termination and was returned to the service in 2006. Williams was again fired for brutality in 2009, and again reinstated.

America, we need to talk.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 104 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The whole article continues that

As of 2023, Williams is assigned to domestic violence cases

Yeah, sounds like a real stand-up, sensitive, emotionally-intelligent dude that I'd want handling those kinds of cases.

[–] MycarHolmes@quokk.au 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

to be fair, he probably IS an expert in domestic violence.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 23 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but so are 40%, by their own admission.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

He gives advice to the husbands on how to improve their swing.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

There are so many levels of fucked up in this story.

First off, the other police rammed a dude and pinned him to a wall with a car because they thought he was a criminal. A) Who the fuck thinks treating a suspect that way is OK? B) Why would you continue working with the people who think that is OK?

Secondly, four cops beat a man nearly to death because they thought he was a suspect in a crime. Same two questions as before. How can they think it's totally cool to beat a man nearly to death simply because he MIGHT have committed a crime?

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

He’s now commissioner of the Boston Police Department. The same department that beat him.

This man is incredibly forgiving. That’s incredible.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Forgiving or trying to fix a corruption problem from the top?

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He’s doing both, but what I meant is that when an organization wrongs you so badly, it’s easier to become hateful and vengeful. Instead, he’s actively trying to make it better. He didn’t quit being an officer when so many people would have.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure.

If I was him I suppose I would want to get revenge by getting to be their boss and firing them or training them until they change their behavior.

I think the solution is pretty straightforward you have to get rid of the racist/corrupt cops it's not like a stern word will change people like Williams (the cop that kept on getting fired and reinstated).

So I dont think he is forgiving anybody here. He is on a mission to eliminate the issue from the top. And when it comes to mafia like structures like in Boston the only person that can effectively deconstruct that is at the very top of the hierarchy.

At least that's what I'm hoping for. Also I thought the person that elected him is known to be fighting against police brutality and racism.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

He genuinely wants to make the world a better place.

We need more people like him

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the officers that beat him still work for him. One is assigned to the Domestic Abuse division.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Whoa. I had no idea!

It sounded like the entire force had problems at the time the attack happened. I hope he was able to make reforms to the force but also to those officers.

Scary that they are in Domestic Abuse division tho, regardless

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

When asked why there was no autopsy on Yeakey, an Oklahoma City Police Department spokesman, Master Sgt. Gary Knight, referred a reporter to the state medical examiner’s office, whose director of operations, Kari Learned, wrote, “Our office does not answer case specific questions.”

Gotta wonder what was on that video tape.

OKC cops tend to have the same leanings as McVeigh…

[–] Eczpurt@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

3 times total misidentified as a suspect. Even pinned to a wall with a police car?! Then he still wants to keep policing, like holy moly. I'd have honestly left after the first one. I can understand sticking around if it was incidents directly involving criminals but when it's the backup that's getting me, especially more than once, I'm calling it a day.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 62 points 1 day ago

"misidentified as a suspect" my ass. Correctly identified as a person of colour. I wish they would talk honestly about these things.

[–] waz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I have had the thought before that the police problem could be improved if decent human beings joined the force and tried to change it from the inside out. I think it could make a difference but I don't think many people consider it because it feels like joining the wrong team.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget the danger involved with such a choice. Unfortunately, we probably never hear about the majority of those who try to do right as a so called "peace" officer.

Cox, though? Motherfucker has got some brass balls, man, holy shit

[–] waz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I realized the dangers involved. That is why I never became a police officer myself.

... actually the reason is because I was too old by the time I had the idea to try, but realistically I had talked myself out of it before I knew that.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I think there's a few levels of problems with policing.

First, what is the job of the police? If it comes down to protecting people vs government/property, what is the priority? At what point does it switch from protecting a suspect vs stopping a crime? When does a situation go from upholding the law to breaking it? It feels there is a lot of grey area that should be more well defined.

Secondly, should police be policing all the time? If cops are out there seeing nothing but suspected criminals all day, every day, how could that not end up influencing their view on the people they encounter negatively? Maybe we should give police some positive experiences with their community, participating in things for healthy and wellbeing of their fellow citizens? Get them involved in social work, recovery programs, therapy programs with inmates or addicts so they learn why people end up going down the roads they do, food banks, etc. Give them time to see these people as fellow humans with dreams, flaws, and to understand the decisions they face that lead them to the positions they're in. Also let people on the other end see cops the same way.

I think a lot of hate and violence comes from not understanding people we only briefly encounter, especially when one or both parties is already coming into things with negative views. But subjecting even the nicest cops to nothing but the dark underbelly of society is going to change them negatively. If we want to have good cops, I think we need to make being a cop a better job. Not just offering unlimited overtime to numb the pain of seeing terrible things, but evening out the good and bad experiences with the people you are policing.

There's still a ton of other things we could get into about just the culture of violence, the incentives of privately run prisons, etc, but all that is a bit darker than I feel like getting into now.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if decent human beings joined the force

What if most of them get "broken" not before, but in their first months there?

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The police is essentually the monkey ladder experiment

https://psychologyfor.com/the-monkeys-bananas-and-ladder-experiment-obeying-absurd-rules/#The_Experiment_Setup

You have to basically fire everyone and start from scratch.

[–] waz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'd never heard of the monkey banana ladder experiment before. At the end of the article it said that that experiment has never actually been done. When searching further, it seems like this is an often cited hypothetical experiment. I found mention of a similar study that actually happened that allegedly had different results but the details seem to be behind a paywall.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you watched The Wire? Shit is systemic. "Good" people don't last long as police.

[–] waz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've not seen the wire, but now I'm afraid if I do it will make me sad.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Oh it's outstanding. You should absolutely watch it... Amazing writing, and even though they use pay phones in season 1, it holds up incredibly well. Seriously, it's so good...

I was going to go into some more detail about why it's depressing in some ways, but if there's a chance you'll watch it, I'd rather not spoil it.

Just watch it. And don't give up on season 2, it gets good and don't worry you will see the characters you loved from season 1 again.

[–] derry@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

There an level of intelligence barrier. One you must be below https://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

He is dedicated to helping his community

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

so basically in this area criminals just have to run past one black guy and the cops will assume he's the suspect and start to beat him up.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

"Only 15 stabs in the back? What an awful suicide"

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah, so that's what you do with suspects... And admittedly he was suspected, so all is well here. /s