this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
284 points (95.8% liked)

politics

24776 readers
2742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 10 points 22 hours ago

I think it's quite clear that the mob is the lesser evil. The US federal government broke the social contract and so the state has no legitimacy. The mob also isn't interested in genocide.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wish these politicians would rub some brain cells together and start calling for the formation of a California militia.

Not a gang.

A militia.

Find a way to incentivize Oregon and Washington to form their own as well.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

If liberals had the self awareness and knowledge of political history to realize what the opening moves of a civil war looked like they'd be socialists.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If the vice mayor tells them to organize, it qualifies as "well regulated" I suppose.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Worked in Italy.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I get what she was trying to say, but her execution was piss poor.

[–] ZK686@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I'm Mexican/American, born and raised in Southern California and this woman is an idiot. Ever since I was a kid, gangs have TERRORIZED our neighborhoods. My brother and I were beat up, harassed, and constantly in fear because of the street gangs in our area. All gangs, no matter the race, are HORRIBLE people who kill and rob their own. This politician almost "glorifying" this crap is a slap in the face to us who have had to endure street gang's wrath of violence in our neighborhoods.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Remember when The Black Panthers were labeled a "gang"? You know, that OG "revolutionary" org initially focused on armed self-defense against police brutality, by blending Black nationalism, socialism, and self-defense, while advocating for the rights & empowerment of African Americans and marginalized people everywhere?

They created and maintained such heinous criminal enterprises as:

  • Free Breakfast for Children Program,
  • People's Free Medical Clinics (PFMCs),
  • Liberation Schools
  • the Oakland Community School
  • and many other community-activation initiatives

Yeah. Exactly. They're criminalizing any & all resistance. Full stop.

Fascists gonna fascist.

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 1 points 21 hours ago

Makes sense. If there's one thing gangs are known for, it's taking the advice of government officials.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 176 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Oh man, the parallels with history here are strong...

Back in the day companies would use government to crack down on things like union strikes. So the unions started working with the Mafia for protection.

This didn't work out well for the companies (executives getting carried off, tortured, and executed... That sort of stuff) so the government came up with a compromise: Strong labor laws.

Now we have the government itself violating it's own laws (Bill of Rights), kidnapping harmless people, sending them to faraway prisons to become slaves. Hooking up with organized crime seems like a logical path 🤷

...as in: WTF did you think was going to happen‽

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The best deal leaders could ask for is a strong social contract. They don't have to look over their shoulders we don't have to look over ours.

Also the ability to safely leave power. Jimmy Carter got to spend his retirement building houses for charity, Saddam Huissen got to spend his in hiding, Ghaddafi got to spend it being tortured awaiting execution by a mob of his citizens, and Hitler's retirement was spent absolutely ruining a bunker toilet while going through withdrawal. I'd much rather rule with limits then step away safely.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yea, there is no way Trump steps away clean from this. If he leaves office voluntarily there will be legal attacks on him until the day he dies.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Hound him until the day he dies. Investigate EVERYTHING, leave no stone unturned, and charge him with every single count he ever violated. Then stack the sentences on top of each other. Hopefully, it's only about 18 months for each sentence, so that he has to switch prisons every year or two, so he can never get settled in. Unless they just want to toss him in the deepest dungeon in the new 30,000 bed facility he's building in Guantanamo right now. Let him be housed in his own prison.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

This is the way.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

That's why Elon has access to everything about everyone. So any and all that would do such things can be found immediately and all access to life can be cut off by those loyal to Trump. If that doesn't work, he can send the Proud Boys or some other fascist gang to your door.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Those who don't read history are doomed to repeat it.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Read? Like subtitles?

[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was more like the mafia realized that if they could take over the labor unions, they could use them to bully and extort money from unionized businesses by threatening labor actions like strikes. And they knew that unions would have a hard time turning down muscle, so they would make union leaders “an offer they couldn’t refuse”. Also the mafia was way more likely to torture a union boss who realized it was a deal with the devil than use violence against a wealthy business owner.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 23 hours ago

One of the major uses for unions was to give mobsters a steady paycheck. Every Union working on a big civil construction project would inflate their budgets by a few extra men, and those jobs would go to mobsters.

There were two types of jobs. In the first type, the guy had to show up to the job site, but he didn't have to work. Union guys from the old days can tell you about the 3 or 4 guys who did nothing but play cards all day. These jobs went to the lower level workers, often younger, just so they would have a "normal" looking life, and a regular paycheck.

The second type were "ghost" jobs, where the workers never even showed up. These went to the higher level guys, who might hold multiple ghost jobs simultaneously.

Then they would also steer contracts to mobbed-up suppliers, with inferior products, shorted orders, bribes, etc.

[–] msmc101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 170 points 2 days ago (3 children)

she's right though, like historically, gangs are a source of community organization in neighborhoods that the government has written off, this is the time for them to shine and really help their communities

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 2 days ago

The mob has always taken pride in these roots. Let us hope they understand ICE are just disposable street enforcer fodder for billionaires and politicians.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean the Navy did ask for the mafias help monitoring the fishing routes and docks up the east coast during world war 2 to monitor for German vessels bringing fuel back to submarines and such. Believe they asked Jewish gangs for help as well to break up NAZI sympathizer groups and monitor worker unions. Hard to say what may have actually been happening though. We can say for sure they commuted a Mafia members sentence and deported him back to Italy right after the war ended.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 24 points 2 days ago

In August 1960, the CIA contacted the Cosa Nostra in Chicago with the intention to draft simultaneous assassinations of Fidel Castro, Raúl Castro, and Che Guevara. In exchange, if the operation were a success and a pro-U.S. government were restored in Cuba, the CIA agreed that the Mafia would get their "monopoly on gaming, prostitution and drugs".

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean sort of. I’m not sure gangs are a healthy way for neighborhoods to organize though.

I mean I don’t care if they take action against ICE but there’s a reason they’re not, and it’s because gangs exist to look after their own interests first. They don’t want to start a war with the feds for obvious reasons.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 101 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like a solid take. More people should be encouraging violence against ICE.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only good ICE agent is a dead ICE agent

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, it's in the fucking name. Ice ICE, baby!

[–] snipon 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

something something "while the gia'teen resolves this"

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

It's hammer time.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 77 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck that. This woman’s the first to speak up against this shit. I hope the gangs were listening.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

The mayor of LA has been speaking up.

[–] Jolly_Platypus@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree 100%. The Icestopo must be stopped.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

It's right there in the name!

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They're mad precisely because she's right

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago

Oh no. Would be such a shame when the cowards from ICE get shot on the street while (checking notes) terrifying children and using them to get to their parents.

Suuuuuuuuuuuch a shame I tell you!

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So. The person in charge of ensuring those under their care know how serious this is and is fighting with them.

Of COURSE the bully doesn't want that do, so the mayor us now under the gun.

This is not the United states my ancestors died for. It isn't the land I grew up in over 50 years ago, and isn't the country my son was born into.

before anyone responds all snarky while there's no sword of ICE over your heads like my wife has, don't want to hear it. I didn't vote for trump, did vote though, so no this isn't my fault, or my kids, or my wife's. Yes im in the streets and fuck off to anyone who isn't in the streets or protesting trump yet still has a bullshit reply.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is not the United states my ancestors died for.

It literally is, though. Trump isn't a new kind of president, he's a return to the nation's white nationalist authoritarian roots.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The founding fathers weren't interested in liberty and freedom, they were just pissed that they weren't kings themselves.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If not for Dunmore's Proclamation, Washington would have still been fighting for the British

The two were on good terms not two years earlier when Washington believed Dunmore would help him secure more territory in the Ohio River Valley.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If any German historians are among us please share what German organized crime was up to 1925 ~ 1945

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ringvereine:

These associations of criminals, which had been a feature of German society since the late 19th century, continued to operate, albeit underground, even after being banned by the Nazis.

The Nazis viewed crime through a racial and biological lens, targeting individuals deemed "asocial" or "hereditarily predisposed to criminality". This ideology led to the detention of many individuals in concentration camps without due process.

The Nazi regime actively constructed a narrative of Jewish criminality, using it as a tool for persecution, dispossession, and ultimately, genocide.

The Nazi regime itself became a perpetrator of organized crime on a grand scale, engaging in systematic theft, violence, and mass murder against targeted populations, including Jews, Roma, and political opponents.

Change the names of the persecutors and some of the persecuted and you have America today.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Do we have more depth on how the various crime factions faired before during and after? I'm most curious if the Nazi were killed by other Nazi, allies, escaped, etc...

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I fully support this initiative and if some gangbangers want assistance from my lily white ass I'm happy to help.

Im glad she said it, I have actually been saying the same thing, it’s time for some gang on gang justice