this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
1042 points (99.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41663 readers
1268 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 203 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The prospect of still being billionaires, but with less billions, was just too much to handle

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly why they need to be taxed more.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 21 points 1 week ago

Billionaires shouldn't exist to begin with and don't assume tax money are used by governments for good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 110 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Now imagine if there was some way a government could take a percentage of that and put it towards improving society as a whole.

Oh well, guess we're fucked.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

BUT THAT WOULD BE COMMUNISM!!1!

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

stop stop i'm already hard

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 104 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Lol... While gates foundation does do some decent work. Let's be real it is astroturf operation inherently

Also, Warren already back out.

So this is just a shill op for these "good" parasites.

Read between the lines folks, these people are your enemies

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

To people like this, the number in their bank account is like a scoreboard. They didn't get that high up the leaderboard purely by accident.

Anyone who thinks that kind of person is just going to give up their place on the scoreboard is either incredibly naïve or gullible.

Don't get me wrong, there are some people to there who may have some semblance of empathy, but as seen by the title, that's about 1 in 25.

They also don't do good things out of the goodness of their hearts, they do it to win social points so that they don't get gunned down in the middle of a NYC street.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

To people like this, the number in their bank account is like a scoreboard.

It's not just that.

Besides the humanitarian work that the gates foundation does do "voluntarily", money is agency, it is power.

There is very little argument and reason to believe that "people" and "countries" would actually be more responsible in spending it.

If there was a big, motivated, carefully planned social movement that had a solid idea and spending plan, things would be different. And such a group could also force them to give up that money to spend it on these things. But such a movement doesn't exist.

As it stands, the idea that they would voluntarily give up money is dumb. To do what? Feed the corruption and nepo network in their country, that then will benefit only the people that are just like them, but less rich? That makes no sense.

It has to come from public pressure and equal wealth taxes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I assume that tax avoidance is also a factor.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 16 points 1 week ago

You wouldn't expect these clowns to pay taxes that's what w2 slaves are for. In fact, the treasury should be paying them. Just look at the national debt since 1980s then look at how fat these swine got.

Crux of the everything crisis we got on our hands.

But hey the good parasites paid 15k for a fluf piece, put on a suit and say thank you!

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Let's not forget ~~lobbying~~bribery. And since said political influence is ostensibly being bought for the sake of charity, nobody would even blink.

Just my theory, mind you. But every one of these charitable foundations is primarily done for tax avoidance. No question. Well that is every one of these foundations except for the one set up by Mr President Tiny Dick. He just can't resist the temptation of embezzlement. I mean seriously, he bankrupted THREE casinos, and had a judge not just dissolve his foundation, but also bar him from running one of these so-called charitable foundations ever again.

I don't even want to know how you can fuck up that egregiously. One of those things where you have to wonder if successfully finding understanding of how it happened is going to hopelessly corrupt your own soul for all of eternity.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 83 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lowleveldata@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

tbh I'm surprised that there are 9 who did

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

On an unrelated note, Bill Gates is in the epstein list.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

And the reason Melinda divorced him.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 47 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Meh. I actually don't think its a good idea. You just draw power away from the best of a segment empowering the biggest assholes. Taxes should be progressive and include all sources of income not just wages and the tax brackets should go all the way up to the highest income level. So there should be a level for over 100 billion and another for over 10 billion and over 1 billion and so on. Five figure income should be zero.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago

Taxes should be progressive

Yeah ofc. Why do you think the billionaires came up with this BS plan instead?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The fact that there are 256 billionaires is an absolute failure of our society.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

256 billionaires that we know of!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wowza scoob. Imagine that. Rich people lying.

Just wow.

[–] jouhija@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 week ago

Sound like rich people ought to be dying

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

They broke their arms patting themselves on their backs and can’t write checks anymore. 😢

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (4 children)

why did they only use an 8-bit number to count billionaires , surely there are more of em

/dumbface

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I forget where I heard this story, but apparently Bill and Melinda were at a dinner party during the Obama Presidency. Bill said that he had "way more power than Obama" and Melinda kicked him under the table. TBF I think he was completely right: politicians in the US derive their power from their ability to raise money from rich donors, while rich donors derive their power directly from their money. And they continue to derive power from their money even when they deposit it into a "foundation" which doles it out tax-free to favored recipients.

In Gates' case, a lot of his "charity" involves donating patent-protected drugs to third world countries to forestall their saying "fuck your patents" and producing life-saving drugs for themselves. Preserving intellectual property rights is the primary goal here, with actually helping people secondary. Anyone who thinks these ruthless multi-billionaires suddenly become benign, caring people in their advanced years is a rube.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] __VA_ARGS__@feddit.org 29 points 1 week ago

Who would have thought

[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (13 children)

You don't understand, they're making money so much faster than they can reasonably give away.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

making money

I think you mean stealing money.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Not true.

They’re also using imaginary methods to make money grow out of other money.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

by followed up you mean: "Ok after I die, I will donate half of my money to my tax-exempt family-owned-and-operated charity, that just happened to only pay salaries and donations to causes that serve the interests of our family-owned-and-operated shell companies"... :D

it's like sequeezing your late's father dry-drenched cumsocket which he used his entire life, then drinking it, and brag about it... to which I say thanks but no fucking thanks.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

And I don't believe shit of it. I think all their "donations" to foundations and "charity" are tax scams. I've seen so many of these deeply immoral and greedy fucks do this and go on charity drives and I'm not buying any of it, I know these people are just scamming us somehow, they don't do anything out of the kindness of their hearts and betterment of society, it's all about money.

The worst part is- they are not the problem per se, the system is. The system creates this, capitalism creates this, it promotes these people to the top sure, but if not them then anybody else willing to sell their souls to the literal antichrist.

Capitalism is a malignant cancer and needs to be excised and chemod or we all die. DIE. Civilization GONE. Humanity GONE. Culture GONE.

It's us or capitalism.

[–] panicnow@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Link to report instead of awful Fortune link: Giving Pledge

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

These people are genuinely sick in the head, this level of pointless greed is not normal. Of course they aren't going through with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

giving half their wealth to what? charities that they control for pushing agendas (and possibly money laundering if we are talking about billionaires in third world countries with much less regulations)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Is any of that because what would have been half their worth 15 years ago is now less than half of what it would be?

Like, if someone had 100 billion in 2010, and did give away 50 billion in that time, but also made a further 20 billion in that time, did they give away half their worth or not?

I've not read the article, so maybe that question is answered in there.

[–] phillycodehound@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Can't say that I'm shocked.

[–] xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Lmao fuck them my taxesare higher then half

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Once you start to have money, you get a money dependency. No matter how rich you get, the "baseline you really need to live the life you want and nothing more" growths together with your wealth.

Take lottery winners and ask them if they could give away half of their gains. Will you be surprised if most of them say no, even though the day before they would have set their "minimum needed to live a happy life for the rest of my days" at a much smaller fraction of it?

Now take a similar population, but who in addition rationalized them deserving that money through their hard work and talent.

[–] salty_chief@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Every country would need to adopt a universal taxation of wealthy individual for increased taxes to work. What I am saying is if US has a 75% for those earning over certain amount. Then other countries have to do the same. If not then Billionaires will run/relocate to the cheapest taxes. Which would be easy since the country they move to will be happy to get Billionaires tax money.

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Relocation is a bogus threat. Billionaires will not leave first world countries.

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's why more countries should adopt the usa's stance on external taxation. As much as people bitch about it, it's a great anti tax haven policy, even if we don't follow through on everything else necessary to do so

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Or. If billionaires leave the USA. We seize their properties and industry in the name of national defense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pledge

Words are meaningless.

This article has slightly more dirt but still seems a bit vague on hard numbers and names.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›