this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
829 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

74345 readers
3019 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 108 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I live in NJ, USA. I thought I had missed a payment when my last electric bill came. Nope, just a huge rate hike. about the same amount of electricity as the prior year, double the bill.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Were you recently told your bill is gonna go up again when they put in that massive data center in a year or so? We were told. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ no option to say "fuck you, make them pay their bills." Nope. PSE&g was like "brace for it bitch." And that was it.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I probably was. But I also just delete all their emails. They're the only energy distributer in my area. Even if I contracted with someone else I'd have to pay their increased distribution rates.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah same here. Just bullshit that they're like "this is happening. Pay us more"

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

PSE&G told some coworkers of mine their bill would go up by “as much as 20%” shortly before they went up by 150%. One of them got a bill for $800 for their two bedroom apartment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Europeans: "first time?"

My electricity costs must have tripled since the Ukraine war, not like they were low before...

[–] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where are you located? In Germany it spiked but now I'm paying less than before the war (25 vs 27 cents).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 86 points 1 week ago (7 children)

This is going to feel like the recycle scam isn't it. Corpos sucking down every last drop of energy while residential will be asked to turn up the thermostat in the summer and down in the winter so we "do our part".

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Always has been

Residents in big cities have been experiencing it for decades at this point.

ConEd saying "We're preparing for the heat wave in your area this week. Please, limit your energy usage to prevent power outages."

Yeah, and times square is still lit up full brightness. The skyscraper offices aren't doing their part. Most of them, you can feel the cold on the street from their lobbies.

[–] Graymouzer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Charge higher rates for crypto and AI. No one should be hot or cold so some asshole can make more money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This has been the case for decades, why would it change now?

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

It will be even worse than before. Texas hasn't added any power generating capacity outside of the devil that is solar and wind. Solar and wind are the only reasons we haven't seen the rolling blackouts for a few years now. Texas is even trying to make it harder to add more solar and wind, so it will strain even more.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rolling blackouts, my dude. Dig it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 week ago (13 children)

how can they get away with this? Are data centers not paying their bills?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 93 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The way utility rates are set allows them to spread costs onto residential ratepayers instead of bearing it directly.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What? That doesn’t make any sense.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's essentially supply and demand. If the data center is willing to pay more, then everyone has to pay more. I hate it.

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Places like data centers don't pay the same rate that individuals do though. They get an industrial rate.

Basically they cut them a break so they can fuck you. The supply is more More than enough and the only demand that increased was from corporate interests.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Socialism for the rich. Capitalism for everybody else.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Bigger clients negotiate bulk discounts, basically. But the other factor at play here is supply and demand. The higher the demand, the higher the price for the supply. Household demand has remained more or less the same, but because data center demand has shot up, prices have too.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

even under the assumption that they do pay the exact same prices as normal citizens (they don't). electricity prices will go up the more usage there is, as they mostly rely on limited factors.

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 week ago

Yupp just like every single other aspect of our living here our lives have been made worse to protect the interests of large corporations.

Land of the free, and all that.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Are data centers not paying their bills?

They are. The state has failed to ensure there is adequate supply to keep prices flat.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Look up your local “Public Service Commission”

Then note that everyone on it is a republiQan.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 1 week ago (13 children)

And all we get in return are chat systems that make up bullshit facts. I mean, I don't disagree that they can actually do some useful stuff, too. But the proportion of the public that benefits from them in any meaningful way is tiny compared to the cost to the rest of us. I hope a tornado lands on Elon's gas-powered monstrosity in, where, Tennessee, I think? Destroy that shit, please.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago

Don’t let the tech bros into your state.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why isn't the roof of that facility covered with solar panels? It might not provide all the juice they need, but it will offset some. Future facilities like this should be forced to install some sort of energy mitigation strategy before getting approval.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Of course it should be covered in solar panels but so should most roofs everywhere but this single roof would be less than a drop in the bucket.

A square meter solar panel gives you about 100 watts while the sun is at it's highest point, and only when aimed directly at the sun. Typically over the entire day, the average will be a fraction of that

Meanwhile these servers use multiple CPUs that each take around 200 watts. A single server can take between 1-5 kilowatt in power. A single rack than carry dozens of those server's, so you see that you'd need way, waaaayyy more solar panels to make up for all of that

Again, not saying they shouldn't. All buildings should have solar panel roofs, but for this one building it won't do much to the point that the difference would be a blip

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I get it, but you make them all do it anyway, just on principle, if nothing else.

[–] wispy_jsp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Best we can do is diesel generators 😔

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're right about the general idea, but I think you're even underestimating the scale here.

I don't think these servers will be doing much on CPU, they'll be on GPUs. HPE will sell you a 48 rack unit behemoth with 36 Blackwell GB200s for a total of 72 GPUs and 36 CPUs. The CPUs are actually negligible here, but each of the 36 units use a total of 2700 watts (single GPU itself is supposedly 1200 watts so that would make the CPU 300 watts?)

36 * 2.7 = 97.2 kilowatts. You put just a hundred of these in a data center and you're talking over 10 megawatts once cooling and everything is factored in. So this is what, 100k m^2 of solar panels for 100 racks?

You'd want them to be running most of the time too, idle hardware is just a depreciating asset. Say they run 75% of the time. 0.75 * 10 * 24 * 365 = 65700 MWh which I will not even convert to gigawatt hours to simplify this: The average American household uses about ~11 MWh of electrical energy per year. A single AI-focused data center without even all that many racks uses as much power as ~6000 households. They're building them all over the country, and in reality I think they're actually way bigger than what I mentioned. It's putting a significant dent in the power grid, to the point AI companies should be required to commission nuclear power plants before being allowed to build their data centers.

[–] PagPag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When’s the last time you looked into this?

I just went fully off grid and I have a relatively large house and workshop.

The panels I used, which are great but aren’t the absolute best on the market come out to about 231W per sq. meter.

I have a 39kW system installed just for my house. It’s overkill, yeah but I plan for the future (telling the regional power monopoly to go fuck themselves for the next 30 years).

Covering one of these centers with solar would absolutely make a huge impact. Not only by providing power during the day but also with keeping the building cooler.

For reference, the panels I have (65 of), coupled with 100kWh battery bank.

https://www.runergy.com/wp-content/uploads/download/DH156N8-30F.pdf

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My electric utility just arbitrarily added 170 (~50% of the total) bucks to my bill this month, despite me using 11% less electricity.

The whole point of being a utility is to allow the "efficiency" of a monopoly without the ability to gouge the customers. Frankly, I'm looking to see if there is a lawsuit against the utility at this point so I can join on to it.

Also looking into residential solar. Ideally I can just give my electric utility the finger and disconnect my service. Between them and gas, I'm paying about 400 bucks a month, which could get me a nice loan for a solar array, battery backup, and all electric appliances.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I think that sooner or later GPT 6 and higher models will become too expensive for most people, and they will moderate their ardor and start introducing restrictions on use without all this circus like, look, we have a perpetual motion machine...

But even weak models are enough to spy on you damn well.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All the models are already too expensive for most people. Most people don't pay to use them, billionaire investors do. When the AI bubble bursts our retirement funds will collapse and billionaires will simply move money somewhere else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pfizer_dose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I've been thinking this for some time. It just seems completely implausible that companies like OpenAI will continue letting the people of the world use their product for free, what with the ruthless material requirements involved in it's distribution and upkeep.

To me it seems clear that the right to intellectual property and the right to work or contribute meaningfully to a workplace (as if that were actually a right) are currently being blitzscaled. I.e. these guys are running their companies at a loss to allow their product to become a necessity. Once that's achieved you will no longer have the option not to use it and they will be able to charge whatever they like.

We really need to begin pressuring states and governance to protect us from the predatory business models of these venture capitalists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They increased their energy use to produce a provably inferior model. What the hell are they doing?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Raking in vc money?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

“States feel pressure to act”

First of all, did they interview all the States? Secondly did the states say they “felt” “pressure” “to act”? And lastly, Bull.Shit.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tiered pricing would help.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It does

The more you use, the cheaper it is

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›