this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
574 points (99.5% liked)

World News

49151 readers
2117 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alternative for Germany has joined France's National Rally and Reform U.K. in becoming the most popular party in its country, according to polls.

A poll Tuesday showed Alternative for Germany — which is under surveillance by the country’s intelligence services over suspected extremism — is now the most favored by voters. The survey by broadcaster RTL put the AfD at 26%, ahead of the ruling Christian Democrats at 24%.

This is a high watermark for the European far right, a once fringe movement whose virulently anti-immigration, anti-Islam and culture-war politics were shunned by the mainstream just a decade ago.

Today, these parties have developed deep ties with President Donald Trump and his Republican allies, who openly cite nationalists such as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán as inspirations on policy and tactics.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago
[–] Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

It isn’t rocket science, people become uneasy when they see or at least perceive there to be an influx of newcomers, they don’t even need necessarily to be from a different race or culture. It’s simply a fact that isn’t going to change any time soon. And more and more people globally are going to be on the move as the climate breakdown and more wars break out. If you don’t want to see populists thriving then you need to put in the leg work to slow the pace of change that people see and reassure them.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Far right parties are a product of stupidity and foreign money. The stupidity of the establishment parties in Europe ignoring the people's will on immigration enabled the far right, and Putin's Russia gave them the means to run with it.

These parties are here to stay unless the establishment parties take the Denmark approach and become more anti immigration.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Can you link me to some credible sources on legitimate problems caused by immigration in Europe? I'm in the US and I don't see the downside of immigration. Most of the folks angry about immigration here are just being sold a scapegoat.

Admittedly, we're much more culturally diverse to begin with, harder to get to, and have quite a large base population so maybe I'm comparing apples and oranges.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I think it is a case of comparing apples to oranges. I'm saying this as a first gen immigrant from Iraq myself, I'm in the US but I have family in Europe (Finland, Sweden, and Germany), and it's just a very different dynamic. The national narrative about immigration, the ways immigrants are treated by society, and the way government assists immigrants in Europe and the US are quite different. They also get different kinds of immigrants, which is also important. All these factors contribute to very different situations economically, politically, and socially.

But I think this is the wrong way to approach this topic in this context because what matters more in politics is perception. When you look at the polls of any European country with a large immigrant population, virtually all of them have a pretty big chunk of the population, usually ethnically native and working class, that are heavily anti-immigration. This implies that the big issue with immigration in Europe is integration and assimilation. Since the establishment parties over there outright ignore them entirely, they end up flocking to far right parties instead since they're the only ones who want to place restrictions on immigration.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

legitimate problems caused by immigration in Europe

Just my opinion, but: There are no systematic ones that can't just as plausibly be explained by anti-immigrant stances of the locals. Yes, of course, immigration also means SOME people immigrating will be bad in one way or another, but statistically significantly not more or less than the amount of bad people born in the country. Most of the problems "with immigrants" arise from a mutual escalation of people not willing to integrate. In short, and without saying which comes first:

  • immigrant does bad thing X
  • anti-immigrant people point at X and claim it's because they are immigrants
  • some people will believe the accusations and behave more poorly towards immigrants
  • some immigrants will turn the prejudice against them into a dislike / hatred of their host country
  • immigrants do bad things
  • rinse and repeat

Speaking for Germany, all of this is FAR outweighed by the richness that immigrants bring to our country. Germans - and I say that as a German - really needed (and still need) a lot of lessons in empathy and kind-heartedness - and we have more of that now than 50 years ago, thanks to not only evolution of society, but also thanks to immigrants from the mediterranean - Italians, Spanish, Greek and Turks. If Germany had no immigrants, I would leave this country in an instant.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

people not willing to integrate

This is the only "issue" I can think of from my own experience in the US. I imagine some resentment can form if a country has a lot of what I'll call "culture" for simplicity's sake. An influx of people with different "culture" might feel like an attack on your own culture. I frankly don't understand but that's why I mentioned the base population of the US being large and diverse. Perhaps we're already such a "melting pot", at least in the densely populated cities and suburbs, and having so many pockets of cultures is just what I'm used to. I want to better understand but it still just sounds like ignorant fear of a different culture.

Hell, it's a well established statistic, that many people pretend doesn't exist, that criminality is lower among the immigrant population. Any population will have some bad apples, but the incoming population is thinning them out if anything.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I think there's multiple ways it can happen. Sometimes, incoming cultures aim to be inviting and inclusive, and do what they can to become involved with the surrounding community. But other cultures really silo themselves and never speak to "the foreigners" - while continuing to take up more and more of the area. They speak their home language, don't discuss the existing culture or even share their own. They don't act like guests, just tenants - sometimes not realizing that thanks to refugee programs they're often paying "guest rate", not "tenant rate".

However, that certainly isn't always the case. I'd point to the Italian and Hispanic cultures in America as some that have become distinctly American. It's harder for me to give examples of the "silos" since, by definition, you don't see much of them; but sometimes during elections, church gatherings, or other census-related actions, you're reminded they exist.

[–] bier@feddit.nl 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The thing that people ( not you of course) just do not understand, is that for a lot of western countries the birth rate is under 2. So every year the population has a larger part of old people.

Our systems for retirement, government, social programs, etc only really work when more young healthy people are added.

So we actually really need young immigrants to basically keep the boat floating.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

There's that, too. But I hope we can find a way to keep the population size stable at most, because the world already has too many humans...

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago

Billionaires control the polls, own the news, own the social media, and have foundations and think tanks pushing society to the right. It’s all manufactured and twisted. They use lobbying / corruption to ham string all democratically started socialist programs so they no longer work well and it turns people against them. Billionaires are parasites that slowly suck society dry. They shouldn’t exist.

[–] lack@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago

Thanks Elon, for your financial support of Hitler acolytes worldwide. Also, get fucked you Boer-reject piece of shit

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

A Brit told me

I vote for whomever says they will get rid of the boat people

[–] aow@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

The Danes, or the Angles, or the Saxons? Or the Romans? Or the ...

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 63 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

I wonder, how can people look at what Trump/MAGA has done to the US and think to themselves "I want THAT for my country".

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

People are fed up with being broke and not able to afford the same things that they or their parents could afford even 20 years ago. Populists do not have to offer policies they can or event intend to implement so they can promise any old shit to the gullible who want change. Wrap that in a reassuring racist package: immigration is out of control, send back the small boats, etc. so that it doesn't smell like communism (not that communism cant be racist) that people confuse even moderate socialist policies for due to decades of western propaganda.

Couple this with the Overton window being moved ever towards the right due to left and center left parties being captured by neoliberals who seek funding and patronage from the Rich, plus decades of the press putting pressure on any left wing policies by enforcing a double standard of left wing policies required to fully document how they will work and be funded, while right wing fantasy policies are waved through without any scrutiny from the majority of press.

Then the right deliberately break any essential service, under fund it and spend it elsewhere, making it time consuming and expensive to fix, leading them to point at their opponents being ineffective, and the press refuse to hold the right to account over this.

This has reduced any coupling between those left of the far right and the general population in terms of policies meeting the requirement. You can start to see why they are gaining ground.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They don't. But the wealthy, the corporations, etc, they do.

[–] Lev@europe.pub 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They do, the majority of voters are fucking illiterate idiots. It's not always an evil plot by big business, reality is usually far more depressing

[–] aly_gurrl@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I think it's both. With enough illiteracy, enough misinformation and corrupt media, enough evil corporations, and potential election interference, and there you go - far right movements driven by lack and entitilement and hate and greed. Malignent leadership manipulating others and the system to get what they want. Combine it with cost increases because of evil corporations and their clutch on politics and climate change inaction, and resulting cost increase on foods and other products due to major climate events and instability, and that's where we're at. It sucks because with all of our knowledge, our technology, perhaps things could've been way better. But malignant greedy leadership and the worst traits of humanity have given us this outcome.

[–] Trihilis@ani.social 28 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I feel that in 50 years from now there will be documentaries about how the Russians won over Europe and the US by influencing voters and just straight up frauding right wing parties into the government.

I refuse to believe that many people are this stupid/brainwashed to fall for literal 1930's Nazi propaganda.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago

Your comment presupposes that there will be some kind of back to normal in 50 years, which is unfortunately not going to be the case. Climate change accelerates, economic and political crisisl follows, and these kinds of populist movements are going to thrive in that kind of environment.

Climate change will not have stopped in 50 years, on the contrary.

[–] Aetherion@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

IF there will be a free enough country to make this documentary

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The documentary might be in Russian. Even Hitler had planned a museum to feature all the people he had exterminated; once you've won and everybody is dead, there's no reason to hide it any more. Another example would be our (the United States) fascination with native american culture, now that it's far too late to reverse that particular genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

They are retarded that's how

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Maybe ask a Trump supporter?

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 8 points 20 hours ago

Racism and other kinds of bigotry mostly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 6 points 17 hours ago

Not really surprising, social networks are dividing people up and rather than recognize it, people on all political isles are following up with more barriers, essentially demolishing the need for an objective truth for democracies to work in. Social networks as of now are social slaughterhouses designed to lull in people like cattle and turn enough of them into pawns for those with pockets.

You identify issues that certain groups will crowd around divisively, you foster them into ridiculously zealotry, and you break them up into small bubbles you can politically manipulate. Take Reddit - before they used to think they would have more power by focusing on centralized communities that got legitimacy from rigorous contributions, now they are perfectly ok with each community being taken up by whatever brigade is interested in them and whereas communities like T_D were banned before, now they are actively encouraged for each international, localized domain of users.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Britain: Conservative + Labour starts Online Safty Act, Reform tops polls shocked pikachu face

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Labour: We were sure continuing purging our own left base and adopting all Tory policies would make us look good! Fucking traitors the lot of them.

[–] Aetherion@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, but I'm about to go the escapism route.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›