this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
3 points (60.0% liked)

Canada

10576 readers
476 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

In order to carry out this function, it will have to become, first of all, a peacemaker, interested in finding common ground among currently warring opinions. It will have to become much more radically pluralist than it currently is, hospitable to all publics, rather than identified with its preferred public.

This is literally the opposite of the lesson that all successful news outlets have learned in this century. The majority of people identifying themselves as centrists think they don't need news because their rationalist egos think themselves capable of being opinionated on everything from first principles. Rightwing media survives by catering to rightwing views. CBC will never earn the favour of the anti-government aisle. Its only sane choice is to try to lean towards objectivity but without really wasting time both-siding issues because clearly most modern issues have a straightforward right side of history to be on - this game of playing devil's advocate on shitty positions only alienates their real viewers.

The CBC's audience are people who believe a public broadcaster is a social good AND that social good deserves taxpayer funding. The Venn diagram of this group with modern politics is almost a perfect circle on top of progressives.

Regardless of CBC's attempts to cater to their mortal enemies, if/when they get to power, the axe is coming.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago

"If" is incredibly optimistic lol.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To no one's surprise, this author puts out this kind of garbage:

No randomized controlled trial has ever shown that masks β€” even good masks properly fitted β€” reduce transmission of respiratory viruses.

The only explanation for this, that I can think of, is that there was a desperate need for a way of ritualizing the fear that had been generated, and masking provided the needed ritual.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/david-cayley-cbc-actively-suppressed-credible-covid-dissent

It's from the same book that The Walrus is irresponsibly platforming. This is a guy that is objectively wrong about his approach to reporting public health matters, got rightly booted from CBC, and is now complaining about his shitty journalism falling outside the lines that a proper broadcaster is correctly drawing.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

According to this guy, surgeons should just stop wearing masks in the operating room because they don't work.

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just to point out for at least a year CBC has essentially done what the author suggests where there's a article about how bad something is but then slips in a paragraph at the end with some MAGA or MAGA adjacent source that tries to justify it with little substance.

[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just to add a example for this although I posted quite a few in the past want to see more.

During the election Pierre said he'd override the Charter of Rights https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/pierre-poilievre-notwithstanding-clause-1.7509802

This end excerpt.

And to be clear the reason the Supreme Court overturned it was because it was a violation of the charter and violating the charter for the duration of the Parliament is still violation the charter.

There was also a thread of the same guy defending the infamous Peterson quote about women just being holes, but it looks like he deleted it. This just suffice as to what the guy is about although you could just look through the guy's twitter account.

https://xcancel.com/finseraste

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Oof. That's egregious. So according to some people even though the CBC slips up and platforms this kind of moron, it's still not "pluralistic/bipartisan" enough. That's their whole deal: it will never be enough.

I wouldn't say they're slip ups, they made a very deliberate push to APPEAR less partisan at the cost accurate portrayal of events. Even the titles have gotten a bit on the click bait side.

I still consider CBC to be the best large scale news source in Canada and generally decent. But there's some serious issues brewing.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes.

And here I thought the election ending would flick little PP's poorly rationalized talking points into the fucking garbage where they belong.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I mean, he was recently talking about putting Trudeau in jail if he gets into power...

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

I don't know with all their human interest stories about people coming here illegally and being hardships about getting deported. I don't know if they do.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

That seems like a self-interested conclusion from them.