this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
79 points (92.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35303 readers
1740 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you consider ghosting people a reasonable way to deal with today's overwhelming and constant information and notification overload? Or do you find it offensive and unfriendly?

Would you equate it to a person ignoring you irl or is ignoring a text different?

For this post let's assume the people involved are or were in the past friends, and ghosting is leaving someone on "read" for more than 2 days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

For this post let’s assume the people involved are or were in the past friends, and ghosting is leaving someone on “read” for more than 2 days.

This doesn't match how I'm used to seeing ghosting defined.

That behavior might be unfriendly, but there are a ton of innocuous reasons people do it. People are busy and not every message merits a prompt reply. If someone sends me something that requires more time or attention than I have at that moment like a video or news article, I'm likely to make a mental note to look at it later. I might actually remember, and then remember to send a reply about it. I might not.

It's maybe a little rude not to respond to something more important or time-sensitive, but I can always ask again or use something more synchronous like a voice call. People are busy, life happens, tech can be unreliable. It's best not to assume intentional disrespect.


My understanding of the term "ghosting" is permanent or long-term cessation of communication over all channels without explanation. That should be reserved for situations where someone is a physical danger or behaved in a manner so egregious they almost certainly know what they did.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, there seem to be two definitions of ghosting.

The actual definition is when someone you have an established relationship with cuts off all communication without explaination. For example, if your girlfriend of a year and a half just stopped responding to all texts and calls and blocks you on all socials, that would be ghosting.

Then there is the terminally online and emotionally fragile definition, which is when literally anyone doesn't respond to your messages with the utmost urgency and priority. Eg, a girl you matched with on a dating app doesn't keep your endless boring conversations going. Or, as here, a friend doesn't respond to a text immediately.

Unfortunately, the second definition tends to predominate online, and it's hard not to feel the cringe when someone uses it.

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Texts are literally made for busy people. I don't understand how you can call later but not have time later to check their text. Calls demand you at the very moment but texts allow you to respond whenever you are free.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Uh sure. Texts allow you to respond whenever you are free. But if you don't want to, you don't have to. My free time is my own for me to use in any way I please. And if I don't want to reply to anyone in particular during my free time, no one should judge me for that. I'll reply to you when I want to. That's why it's asynchronous communication. Need something more immediate? Call. Visit. Or try texting again (but don't send a barrage of texts.)

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I am likely to send more texts, but at some point, if someone is not getting back to me in the timeframe I want them to, I will call them to force the issue rather than silently getting mad about their slow response.