this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
418 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

12247 readers
639 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The absurdity of the proposal is already in the title, and shows how motonormativity is spread all over the world.

Berlin has a very good public transit system, and a few 30 km/h zones cannot be that bad.

I would love to hear opinions from someone who lives there!

crossposted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/114732266280428499

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Chesterton's ~~Fence~~ Speed Limited Zone

https://fs.blog/chestertons-fence/

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 56 points 10 hours ago

Conservatives won the last election in Berlin in case you were wondering.

[–] sdcSpade@lemmy.zip 45 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Let's bring back CFCs. The ozone layer has recovered, so it's fine.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Don't give them ideas, they already want to bring back asbestos.

[–] deaddigger@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It hasnt it will take another 60 years to fully recover

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

ozone recovers

but the planet is now too warm to live

[–] SirQuack@feddit.nl 1 points 9 hours ago

You know who won't be around to give a shit when it does...?

[–] bimbimboy@lemmy.world 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Shit, I laughed out loud here. This is some The Onion shit

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 1 points 6 hours ago

If the Onion is not out of business yet, it will be soon. Reality is more ridiculous than what they can come up with...

[–] Ekpu@lemmy.world 54 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Yep sounds absurd. As I unterstand it the problem is that you need a reason for 30 km/h zones. The reason was the air quality which is now better so there is no reason anymore. Some zones may be kept because the streets are used by school kids.

I think this is still absurd and good 30 km/h zones with synced traffic lights can yield a good traffic flow.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The air is better, but if we keep not ruining it, it will be too good.

Then the lungs of our children will grow weak.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The children will not be ready for the mines then.

Exactly! They shall be as coal and as bellows in our furnaces!

[–] ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

You dont get it, bad air quality creates strong lungs, strong lungs creates good air quality, good air quality creates weak lungs, weak lungs create bad air quality. /s

[–] mcv@lemm.ee 27 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

The fact that they have improved air quality is not sufficient reason? Do they think air quality is like painting a house, that it only has to be done every couple of years?

[–] albert180@piefed.social 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They have a new conservative government in Berlin which wants to end "the war against cars" and rolls every progress back. They also remove bike lanes "because they cost parking spaces"

It doesn't make sense, they are conservatives after all

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 25 points 12 hours ago

I can't speak to Germany specifically, but a lot of people don't think very much at all. They feel things, and make up words to justify their feelings. (We all do this to some extent, but for some people it seems like that's the only process running)

[–] declaredreprimand@piefed.social 10 points 14 hours ago

Welcome to Germany, land of the pedantry-industrial complex.

[–] Ekpu@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I am totaly with you on that. That fact that those zones did improve the air quality would be a reason for me to keep them.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

So i guess you just want children to grow up with their lungs being coddled?

You want a whole generation to be weak?

[–] Ekpu@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I think you are missunderstanding me. I am totally for 30 km/h zones! What I said above is a official rule for where you can establish 30 km/h zones.

Is it a dumb rule: yes!

Clean air makes weak men. Asthma is strength.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I think the OP was being facetious.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 2 points 11 hours ago

It's Germany, if air quality is not in the pre-approved list of reasons, then it's not acceptable.

But don't worry, once they repair the fax machine they can start processing the request to update the list. In about 7 years it'll be done. Well unless the administration is voted out then the new one might forget about it.

If you improve it too much, the lungs of the people will become weak.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 12 hours ago

That is the reason they used to create them, but municipalities do have the right to create 30km/h zones in any residential area they choose, as long as it is not a major road.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 20 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

motonormativity

I like the new slur!

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I had to read that a few times to understand it :)

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't the word motonormativity from you? I had to re-read that word a few times to get what you were saying with it and it's good.

sunzu2 called it a slur, and a good one at that.

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I wish I was that clever, but no. It's from a researcher named Ian Walker, coined in a very interesting article. It has its own Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motonormativity

Also mainstream articles: https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/31/23579510/car-brain-motornormativity-study-ian-walker

And a video by GCN! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_4GZnGl55c

I'm surprised that by being in the fuck cars community you never heard the term!

[–] caesaravgvstvs@feddit.org 37 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Can't wait for these useless assholes to be voted out next year

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 hours ago

Good luck with that...