this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
526 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

12259 readers
932 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The absurdity of the proposal is already in the title, and shows how motonormativity is spread all over the world.

Berlin has a very good public transit system, and a few 30 km/h zones cannot be that bad.

I would love to hear opinions from someone who lives there!

crossposted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/114732266280428499

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ekpu@lemmy.world 78 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Yep sounds absurd. As I unterstand it the problem is that you need a reason for 30 km/h zones. The reason was the air quality which is now better so there is no reason anymore. Some zones may be kept because the streets are used by school kids.

I think this is still absurd and good 30 km/h zones with synced traffic lights can yield a good traffic flow.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The air is better, but if we keep not ruining it, it will be too good.

Then the lungs of our children will grow weak.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The children will not be ready for the mines then.

Exactly! They shall be as coal and as bellows in our furnaces!

[–] ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago

You dont get it, bad air quality creates strong lungs, strong lungs creates good air quality, good air quality creates weak lungs, weak lungs create bad air quality. /s

[–] mcv@lemm.ee 41 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

The fact that they have improved air quality is not sufficient reason? Do they think air quality is like painting a house, that it only has to be done every couple of years?

[–] albert180@piefed.social 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

They have a new conservative government in Berlin which wants to end "the war against cars" and rolls every progress back. They also remove bike lanes "because they cost parking spaces"

It doesn't make sense, they are conservatives after all

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 1 hour ago

I wonder why conservatives are so retarded, in each country.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 37 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I can't speak to Germany specifically, but a lot of people don't think very much at all. They feel things, and make up words to justify their feelings. (We all do this to some extent, but for some people it seems like that's the only process running)

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

lot of people don’t think very much at all. They feel things, and make up words to justify their feelings

Right... and now they have magical eightballs that can justify with plausible sounding strings of words (LLMs) any feeling they might have.

We're doing great as a species! /s

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Alien 1: "The humans appear to be sacrificing their whole species for their god."

Alien 2: "Which god? Yahweh? Abraham? Krishna?"

Alien 1: "No, it appears to be called 'Money.' Even their so-called atheists worship it, perhaps especially so."

[–] declaredreprimand@piefed.social 14 points 22 hours ago

Welcome to Germany, land of the pedantry-industrial complex.

[–] Ekpu@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I am totaly with you on that. That fact that those zones did improve the air quality would be a reason for me to keep them.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

So i guess you just want children to grow up with their lungs being coddled?

You want a whole generation to be weak?

[–] Ekpu@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

I think you are missunderstanding me. I am totally for 30 km/h zones! What I said above is a official rule for where you can establish 30 km/h zones.

Is it a dumb rule: yes!

Clean air makes weak men. Asthma is strength.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I think the OP was being facetious.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 3 points 20 hours ago

It's Germany, if air quality is not in the pre-approved list of reasons, then it's not acceptable.

But don't worry, once they repair the fax machine they can start processing the request to update the list. In about 7 years it'll be done. Well unless the administration is voted out then the new one might forget about it.

If you improve it too much, the lungs of the people will become weak.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 4 points 20 hours ago

That is the reason they used to create them, but municipalities do have the right to create 30km/h zones in any residential area they choose, as long as it is not a major road.