this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
89 points (97.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34293 readers
1271 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Distributed as in non centralized. Many people feel like there is nothing they can do to contribute to meaningful change, especially with how spread out Americans are, but surely there has got to be something.

Using the trend of blocking traffic as an example, I think a coordinated effort to not just block a highway in one city, but to block state routes and other arteries in many places would be more effective. Instead of one city having bad traffic for a day, it would be many towns and it would be harder to dismiss as a local problem if people across the states are engaging.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuperEars@lemmy.world 3 points 22 minutes ago

Everyone, DRIVE FUCKING SLOW.

"C'mon, that'll just piss myself off." Do you think the French living under nazi occupation wouldn't love to dangle their bumper in front of every German driver that comes along?

Do 58 in a 65.
Do 41 in a 45.

Don't worry, because when I see you on the road driving slow, I'll join you for solidarity. I'll keep a safe distance behind, just attempting to ~~navigate international waters in the South China Sea~~ drive as slow as we legally fucking want.

Stick to the rule of "Stay to the right". Don't break traffic laws. Provide no incriminating behavior beyond "slower than normal".

Let the rest of the bastards deal with it. Those bastards, whose privilege blesses them with the worst part of their day being "shitty traffic," who then arrive to the office and bitch about it to the other old ladies who share that same privilege, ALL OF WHOM proceeded to wax poetic about the nostalgia of their gun-laden childhoods the morning after another elementary classroom was shot up, yet who didn't acknowledge THE SHOOTING amongst each other.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Something I liked about the response to LA was people showing up at hotels where occupiers were staying and driving them out. There's a sort of group denunciation happening, and then also it just makes it hard to do the work - they don't have enough sleep, they have to travel farther to the intended area of action.

What about other ways to foul logistics? And what are other ways to shame/demoralize people supporting the regime? Totalitarians require everyday people to carry out their orders. The more people we peel away or disillusion the less control a totalitarian can exert.

[–] SuperEars@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

We need a community dedicated to these questions.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

If you make a mistake on your taxes you can always file a correction later.

[–] pleasestopasking@reddthat.com 58 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Opting out of consumerism. Not that it's legal disobedience, but it's certainly social disobedience that would get the attention of and take power from the corporations who control our politicians. Yes we can't stop buying everything completely, going to a barter system for everything is not feasible. But we can at least stop buying so much crap.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

There was a 'single day consumer stop' recently that was just plain silly. That won't even show up on a weekly report, let alone concern even managers.

Also, if they don't know it's due to a standpoint, they will look for every other likely reason available. It needs to be a movement

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yep

Modern American economy doesn't give a shit about labor strikes.

But a consumer strike?

Everyone literally cutting out all extraneous purchases and cancelling every subscription except utilities...

That would get the wealthy's attention.

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 11 hours ago

Can’t speak for your household, but ours is already there, by necessity. Shit’s gotten too damned expensive. At this point we’re buying only what we actually need with an eye on how to make it last as long as possible. And me and my wife make $140k combined.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Modern American economy doesn't give a shit about labor strikes.

How do you figure that?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

The old ways are being forgotten

[–] ItemWrongStory@midwest.social 12 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

That's true, but at the same time, aren't most people already boycotting what they can? I think anyone who feels bad about supporting shitty companies are already avoiding them when they can, and if they can't, well there isn't much more to do until we hit mutual aid networks.

[–] pleasestopasking@reddthat.com 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about boycotting shitty companies, though. Just like, boycotting capitalism. To the degree that's even possible. We need food, shelter, and utilities.

But clothes? Repair, swap, thrift.

Entertainment? Cancel streaming services, stop going out to movies. Don't use social media sites that make money by showing you ads. Play cards or board games, read or listen to books from the library. Trade things with friends when you get bored of what you have instead of just buying new stuff. Touch grass.

I'm not saying I do all of this stuff or that it would be easy, but lots of people doing this consistently would make a much bigger difference than boycotting shitty companies piecemeal.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

In that case, I was boycotting before it was cool.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

You need to extricate yourself from your bubble if you think American's are meaningfully boycotting anything.

[–] turdburglar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

target would like a word

[–] ItemWrongStory@midwest.social 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Well, that's part of my point. Everyone who stopped eating at Chick Fil A stopped 10+ years ago, everyone else doesn't care. Anyone willing to boycott is already boycotting, and they can't boycott any harder until we have a method of acquiring necessities from somewhere else.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think there's some fraction of people who are ethically driven, and the rest don't care. Everyone sits on multiple spectra for what they care about, and where their thresholds for acting are. Most people are under the pump for cost of living, and that's pretty dominant when you're on the verge of poverty. Get those people a bit more stability, and they'll have more capacity to care about broader ethical ssues..

[–] ItemWrongStory@midwest.social 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone sits on multiple spectra for what they care about, and where their thresholds for acting are

Right, so what would push people over that threshold now?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago
  1. Its different for everyone, and there will usually be multiple influencing factors, not just one big one, but
  2. I already pointed out one big one in my last sentence.
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Ah! Perfect example as I won't touch Chick Fil A. :)

So yes, those who care and are politically aware are boycotting what they can, but the vast majority of Americans neither care or are aware.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Worked against Bud Light and Cracker Barrel. Not sure how effective it is elsewhere. Maybe Target?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

If every blue state stopped paying federal taxes simultaneously they'd be fucked. Tax season isn't for another sixish months, just saying.

[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It has to be the employees not the state because companies withhold it and remit directly to the IRS. Not saying you should do this, but if you increase your withholdings then it won't go to the IRS. Though you will owe it in April and may have to pay penalties for underwitholding.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Be happy and grow a supportive, active, and independent community network of helpers

[–] ItemWrongStory@midwest.social 3 points 9 hours ago

Not civil disobedience, but I agree. Unfortunately creating communities is probably a bigger ask than getting arrested in a protest.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Birthstrike - stop reproducing

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 6 points 9 hours ago

People are already doing that. Birth rates globally have been trending downwards for decades, but in the US they've been below replacement for over fifty years.

It's not as bad as someplace like South Korea, which is already doomed and past the point of no return, but it's still not great, and we're headed towards the same end if we don't turn things around very soon.

[–] jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)
  1. reproduction isn’t a choice for some people. that’s fucked up but it’s cold & hard reality.

  2. this just increases the ratio of parents in the next generation that are shitty people, effectively strengthening fascist movements by increasing the proportionment of lil hitlers vs everyone else in the kindergarten class.

i think this strategy is highly problematic if you think about it for literally even just a second, and i say that as someone who would never voluntarily have kids.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

isn’t a choice for some people

Previous poster isn't talking about those people; but about people who do have a choice and why they should decline.

this just increases the ratio of parents in the next generation that are shitty people

Correct. But that doesn't justify dropping a child into the dumpsterfire we're turning our planet into just so they can serve as a footsoldier in the fight against it. Children aren't sacrificial lambs.

effectively strengthening fascist movements by increasing the proportionment of lil hitlers vs everyone else in the kindergarten class.

What's to say good parenting can combat that to enough of an extent to actually make a difference? It's not rare for two genuinely good people to produce a little hellspawn that grows up to be a lil hitler despite their parent's best efforts. Good parenting is certainly an important factor, but that's far from a guarantee your kid will do good with their lives. They could just as well be the next actual Hitler.

We can't outbreed stupid or evil. If abstaining from having a kid for the sake of protecting that kid from an increasingly dire hellscape is some kind of failure to delay humanity's downfall, then humanity isn't something that should be preserved.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Step 1. Enter the main office of a corporation en masse
Step 2. Refuse to leave

[–] ItemWrongStory@midwest.social 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not against the idea in spirit, but that's not distributed and not feasible for many people who live far from corporate HQs.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago

Eh? Corporate HQs are all in city centres, and the vast majority of people live in cities...

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I have been fantasizing about figuring out where epstien is buried, digging his evil ass up and catapulting his corpse onto the white house lawn.

That would force them to release the files. It is so outrageous that it would get national attention, and people would support it because RELEASE THE FUCKING EPSTIEN FILES.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I think this would actually have the opposite effect. It’s essentially the Dead Cat Strategy. That’s a political tactic where if you’re losing an argument and can’t see a way to turn it around, just throw a dead cat on the table. Now everyone is suddenly talking about the dead cat, instead of the argument you were losing. It refers to when a politician is losing a debate, so they just start making outrageous statements to grab attention and divert the debate away from the argument.

Epstein’s body would be a dead cat, as news would divert towards covering that instead of covering the files.

[–] SuperEars@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

So like, all of 2025 so far.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 24 points 12 hours ago

This sounds like copium even if it was realistic. The idea that Epstein is some kind of anti-fascist silver bullet fundamentally misunderstands how fascist movements work.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Filling empty beer bottles with hand sanitizer. Pass them out at marches so people don't get sick.

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

With a cloth coming out the top to wipe your hands? And a lighter to keep warm?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 7 points 9 hours ago

you need to fill them mostly with Styrofoam, actually.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Exactly. Wouldn't want to catch cold.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Make friends with random people, especially conservatives.

Make lots of money, which can be used for many useful things.

Buy real estate in your communtity.

Start a business in your community.

Develop personal relationships with your elected officials or other powerful people.

Get elected to positions of power, even if just a school board member or neighborhood council representitive.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So you're suggesting the American Dream is the only way to beat an American nightmare?

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

More or less, yes.

In order to make meaningful change, you need power. So go get power.

load more comments
view more: next ›