Icytrees

No ones owes you a match. Not the app or the women on it. If you don't make a profile people want to match with, that's on you.

I'm a chick. Ignore this if you want.

However, I'm a slut who likes a good hook-up but had years-long monogamous relationships as well. I'm absolutely average looking and have mostly been with men who range from hot as fuck twinks to conventionally unattractive socially anxious weirdos. My last relationship was with an autistic 5'6" guy I met on a dating app, it started as a hook-up and lasted three years.

I look for chill people with passions, who know who they are and what they want. Or, are at least introspective enough to see themselves. Looks aren't a big factor, but cleanliness and effort are. The single dad angle shot doesn't do anyone any favors.

Just from looking at your comments, you're coming in here with a defeatest mindset. People who haven't had much luck can get trapped in that kind of negativity, it works its way into how they hold themselves and what they say in ways they don't even realize. I unmatch with people as soon as they bring that into the conversation. Self-deprecating humor is alright, when carefully done, but risky on first impressions. If I'm looking for a fun hook-up, I want someone who looks and sounds fun.

And we roll the dice...

https://www.psychologistanywhereanytime.com/mobile/sexual_problems_pyschologist/psychologist_paraphilias_list.htm

Stockholming isn't as fun when it's just some guy doing it.

Goddamnit I came here to say that.

I think a heat sensor would do just as well since the butthole is hotter. Unless there's some rogue splashes, in which case it might work on low res/high contrast to avoid identifying video. Or maybe lidar, but then it might just shoot the pimples.

All I know is if we start training AI bidet cameras on millions of videos of dirty assholes we're going to get a version of skynet no one is prepared for.

Thanks for the new band name. A Savage Woodrow.

Do any historians know the significance of the rhino squiggle moon man in her womb?

I may have missed it. I was trying to find how they determined if the women were submissive in the first place, and if they always dressed conservatively. I'm by no means suggesting clothing has anything to do with sexual assault, I have more of an issue with the dominance/submission dichotomy in how it applies to women.

Regardless, good article and good points being made.

I'm happy, sure, but I was hoping for a thorium reactor.

This is wrong on so many levels you have to be trolling.

The women's liberation movement was a feminist movement. Feminism is the ideology behind women's liberation, and has never been about attacking men or women. The people who claim they're feminists but strive for equality by stepping on someone's back are not following feminist ideology.

Now, feminism is more focused on intersectionality than it has ever been, working toward equality across age, race, gender, nationality, religion and ability. There has never been a feminist movement that took into account the issues men face under a patriarchy as much as modern day feminism.

Hey, fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to explain.