133
What technologies were ubiquitous ten years ago and are much less common now?
(lemmy.blahaj.zone)
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmy
35205 readers
1094 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe 1/100 people I see using headphones have wired headphones, certainly wasn't the case 10 years ago. Bluetooth technology and quality has come a long way.
I'd still have wires IF MY PHONE HAD A PLACE TO PLUG THEM IN.
I refuse to buy a phone without a headphone jack. I'm not sure if I even have a choice anymore tbh... Really I only use my phone for music and text/call. A dandy map if I need one, but not usually.
I compared a tonne of flagship smart phones not that long ago. The Sony Xperia series was the only one to still have an audio jack. They're quite expensive tho, so ended up with a phone sans the jack. I miss it dearly.
See how they massacred my boy...
People really will copy anything Apple does.
Buy a USB-C to headphone jack dongle. They’re about $5 and work on any phone.
Did that. Still annoying. Have to bring it everywhere. Will wear out the Usb C jack faster (pretty hard to wear out an audio jack tho). Can't charge and listen to audio.
USB-C puts the springy bits that can wear out in the connector end, not the jack. The jack is just a piece of circuit board with bare traces on it, it's very sturdy.
You don't have to bring it everywhere, you attach it to your headphones and then it's part of the headphones that you want to wear.
Fair point about the sprongs. But. Coz phones are so big, when phone+dongle is in my pocket it often puts a lot of pressure on the USB. Which A, doesnt seem good and B, can easily cause the jack to very slightly disconnect and pause the song. Also, when the sprongs fail on the dongle it starts doing crazy shit like play/pausing song or adjusting volume.
I'd need to buy like 3 more dongles in that case...
I'd much rather just have an audio jack on my phone.
You can just get a case that has the adapter integrated.
You guys are only $5 away from the good ole days…
I would love that if it wasn't another cord that I would absolutely lose.
You can buy headphones with a USB-C connector too. That way you’ll lose the headphones too, so you don’t need an adapter anyway!
I do like my AirPods, but I'm still pissed off that the duopoly killed the headphone jack. Give me back my headphone jack!!
I could NOT be bothered with charging headphones daily.
A decent set of headphones will have an effectively all-day battery, and most people probably aren't listening to their headphones for 8+ hours a day.
I've had my headphones for about 7 years now and they still last for several hours on a single charge, and they support fast charging. If they're at 0%, I can plug them in for 10 minutes and they'll have about 2 hours worth of charge. I charge them maybe once a week with casual use.
My Marshall on-ears have a battery life of like 80 hours or so...
They usually charge themselves in their case (small pods) or have big batteries (over ear). I use my pods probably 8 hours a day, and just need to charge the case once or twice a week.
The battery will wear our within a few years and become unusable. My Bluetooth headphones now last about 30 minutes.
I got my headphones over 6 years ago, the battery last as long as it always has. And I use them a few hours every day.
Got the AirPods Pro 1st Gen in 2019, still going strong. Usually have to recharge every 1,5-2 days and I use them pretty every day for commute from home to work and back (in total about 1,5H).
I'm sure that's true, but I've never managed to keep a pair of earpods for more than a couple of years. I always end up losing them, generally while travelling.
Bluetooth isn't the technology that's come a long way, it's still the same shit it was decades ago. It's batteries.
That's just not true, Bluetooth codecs have improved sound quality DRAMATICALLY.
And I say this as someone who's not a big fan of wireless.
The engineers at Bluetooth SIG busting their ass to give us Bluetooth 6.1: "am I a joke to you?"
Kinda, yeah.