this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
243 points (94.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

38233 readers
1274 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They sell things that come in cups, or with napkins. Lots of people cycle/run/walk here instead of driving, seems pretty stupid.

Taking away the bins doesn't mean you don't produce rubbish....

Edit: I think there is still a bin IN the cafe, but most people eat/drink outside. Lots of people asking staff where the bins are. Still hypocritical I think though? (And still mildly infuriating to remove well used bins!)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 7 points 46 minutes ago (2 children)

I'd give this some odds of reducing trash pollution. It can seem frustrating, but it MAY change people's behavior in a way that reduces litter. Behavioral economics can be counterintuitive.

[–] bali10050@lemmy.world 10 points 33 minutes ago (2 children)

No. Most people just start littering when there's no trash bins nearby.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 5 points 29 minutes ago

Think of the stupidest person you know, etc etc.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

They're shit people. I take cans home to recycle because we don't have proper recycling at my workplace.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Yes, they are. But that does not make it better that there is no bin. I have been in a situation with no bin but trash that can not simply be carried (disgusting liquid) and had to dump it. That is extremely rare for me, I usually pick up others trash. But there are situations where you simply need a bin, no matter how green you are.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 minutes ago (2 children)

If you operate a business that sells things in paper plates and wrappers, you certainly have a moral responsibility to have waste receptacles to collect those waste products.

The problem isn't that a park lacks trash cans. The problem is that a cafe removed their trash bins.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 12 minutes ago

I feel the same way, but about places that sell coffee having an obligation to provide a public bathroom.

Glares angrily at 7-11

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 43 seconds ago

The he cafe still has bins inside, they have a way to collect their refuse.

The park removed the bins since people from the cafe weee likely overfilling it.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 3 points 25 minutes ago

It's like my university campus removing all ashtrays to stop people from smoking.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 57 minutes ago

That's not how this works.

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 84 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I used to work for the Woodland Trust and believe that this is the right thing to do. Bins in woodlands do not get emptied often and will often overflow and attract unwanted pests like rats. Rats will also eat the eggs of ground nesting birds and cause other environmental issues.

If they are selling food on site then the food vendor should have a bin that their customers can use inside their cabin/cafe and dispose of the waste daily as part of the service.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 35 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Bins in woodlands do not get emptied often and will often overflow

Think I found the problem— why not do the obvious thing and empty them more often?

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 4 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

Because that would mean employing someone to empty them regularly, and as most woodland is few and far between in this country most woodland owners deem that an unnecessary expense.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 5 points 28 minutes ago

There’s a cafe and forestry workers, is it that time consuming?

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (4 children)

Who’s gonna do it and pay for it?

If people weren’t such babies and cleaned up after themselves, we wouldn’t need to waste taxpayers money on cleaning up after adults who could do it themselves.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

The problem isn't that a park removed their trash cans. The problem is that a cafe removed their trash cans.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

The cafe still has garbage cans inside, and why would the forestry speak for the cafe…? The sign is from the ministry of forestry, why would you claim the cafe removed the bins when they stated THEY did themselves?

It’s like people just make shit up to get mad about. The sign told you who removed it for fucks sakes lmfao.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 hour ago (5 children)

I dunno about you, but if I see a bin in a public area, I assume some is paid to empty it. I don’t empty it myself.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

So they can't afford to keep the land they have in trust so it is all the landless peasantry that should labor for the land holders because kindness ?

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 36 minutes ago

Wild argument. No one is "laboring for land holders", they're cleaning up after themselves for their own good and the good of everyone/thing around them

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Who’s gonna do it and pay for it?

Sounds like there's a bunch of people and some kind of organisation that runs this area, after all, they made the decision to take the bins away. This is also a cafe area, so someone's making money off this zone.

THOSE PEOPLE ARE.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Genuine answer here, as someone who volunteers for the parks. A lot of times the budgets are tight, depending on whose responsibility it is to clean up the area and what services are there/nearby, the staffing just isn't available. Yeah it's a pretty easy thing to do in theory, but in practice when it becomes "okay and 2 hours of your shift is driving out there and emptying the cans" it's not a far leap to just "Remove the cans, make the snack stand dispose of their garbage on their own"

I mean I get it, the cans are nice but also, like you're an adult. Throw your trash away on your own.

"But then people will throw it on the ground!" Okay then pay someone to stand out there and slap every idiot that thinks littering is okay because they couldn't find a can in 10 seconds.

It's common decency in plenty of places around the world to take your garbage with you until you find a can. It's not hard.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 18 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

This is right by the cafe/site office/car park though. The reception desk is about 20m to the left and staffed during daylight hours year round.

Not like it's in the middle of nowhere.

I get your point, there are very few bins elsewhere (mostly by the other car parks) and that's fine. It's just that the place that gives you rubbish makes it hard to responsibly get rid of it.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

May I ask the name of this place? I'd like to pull it up on Google Maps and have a look at the layout.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Isn't there a bin at the cafe?

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 minutes ago (1 children)

I think that's the problem. I interpret it as the cafe removed their bins.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 1 minute ago)

It’s a sign from the forest ministry, they removed their bins.

Why on earth would you think a sign from the ministry of forestry would be speaking for and removing a cafes bins…?

Read the fucking sign for fucks sakes. It’s literally, right fucking there.

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 85 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Gentrified forest is the most cursed phrase I heard in a minute.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's a pretty good description. Has a tarmac car park, cafe, bike hire, 3 go ape routes, wheelchair accessible routes and until recently, bins!

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

You should look up the definition of “gentrification.” There are a ton of options that don’t suggest that the homeless people in the forest are being forced out and replaced with wealthier homeless people.

Maybe “commercialized” would be a better word choice? Alternatively, “developed” or “sanitized?”

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What does homelessness have to do with anything? Gentrification isn't specifically about homelessness, I don't see anyone else mentioning it before now... where did you pull that from?

Gentrification seems to mean the rapid renovation of an area to appeal to a wealthier crowd, which this could easily cover.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 0 points 37 minutes ago

Poor people won't feel at home if there isn't trash strewn everywhere. They'd probably avoid going to that place.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago

You are right, I was thinking the definition more being taking it up market, fancier etc. didn't realise the term was more for the human effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] liv@lemmy.nz 13 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This has been happening in New Zealand for a while. The theory seems to be that bins attract more litter and are a hazard to wildlife.

I was sceptical at first but it actually seems to work.

Perturbs me that they are selling food though. Surely yhe food sellers should have bins for which they are responsible in their immediate vicinity.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 45 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (5 children)

That might sound backwards but it isn't

Squirrels and raccoons will rummage, and disperse trash. There isnt much you can do about that beyond 1. Harm wildlife or 2. Reduce trash.

Edit: Damn, this thread is full of people I would be fucking embarrassed to camp with. Where do y'all like to experience the outdoors so I can be sure to not cross your paths?

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 30 points 3 hours ago (8 children)

Or 3, provide animal-proof garbage disposals.

[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

There aren't many wild camping spots in the UK, especially in forests. Definitely no raccoons either haha. This area would be more for walking or picnicking.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lost_tortie@lemmy.world 38 points 4 hours ago

please clean up after yourself.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 24 points 3 hours ago (9 children)

Weird, when Japan does it everyone praises them. I guess us western societies are just too trashy to clean up after ourselves.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

This is basically ubiquitous on many public lands, specifically here in the US. The term is "carry in, carry out." Bins accumulate trash (obviously) which in turn is an attractant for rodents, bears, raccoons, etc. which causes its own problems. Wild animals should not be artificially fed by human trash. Trash can also be blown out of cans, or scattered by animals. Overall, especially for low traffic environments, the best plan is to have people take all their trash out with them.

TL;DR: Pack out your trash.

load more comments
view more: next ›