this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
676 points (99.0% liked)

News

28345 readers
4778 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago

2 trillion, so far!

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TheMachineStops@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

He did as he promised, financial liberation.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 18 hours ago

From the poor

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 25 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It's just utterly infuriating and miserable. This isn't a Nelson-Ha-Ha.gif moment.

Ordinary Americans will suffer for this. People will lose their homes, their jobs, their lives. And ordinary people in other countries will suffer for it too - job losses for companies who majorly sell to the US are inevitable. Car companies in the UK (Landrover, Aston Martin, Jaguar, etc are already making noises about job-cutting).

And the vastly wealthy will benefit, as they always do, by picking up those bargain basement stocks which will, eventually, become valuable again. And it's the plan. It's always the plan. Transfer wealth from the many to the few. Brexit was a cash grab. Trump is a cash grab.

[–] alexplex@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

by picking up those bargain basement stocks which will, eventually, become valuable again.

Everyone can do this. Even if it's only $50. If you have nothing, you gotta start somewhere. I'm investing every penny I can spare right now.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

And the vastly wealthy will benefit, as they always do, by picking up those bargain basement stocks which will, eventually, become valuable again.

I don't think that's correct.

Imagine, if you will, an uptick in vandalism on Tesla Cybertrucks. Insurance companies notice and increase the price of insuring them. The used car market price for those vehicles goes down, with fewer people wanting to buy vehicles that are more expensive to insure and are more likely to be vandalized.

Is that price drop a dip that a savvy investor can take advantage of? Is there an investment case for buying used cybertrucks and then hoping that Elon's stink fades? I don't think so. The value of that thing has permanently decreased.

Look to American soybean farming. Trump put tariffs on China in 2018, and China retaliated with tariffs on soybeans, among other products. Brazil stepped in and started exporting a lot of soybeans to China, and maintained that market share even as the tariffs were canceled. Basically, American farmers never recovered. Buying up all that farmland for cheap wouldn't have done anything because the new owners of that land can't benefit from some kind of higher profits from that land.

Sometimes things drop in price because they just become less valuable. I think that's what's happening with American stocks right now, because the damage that is being done is hard to reverse.

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 41 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Do I remember correctly that trump was elected mainly on improving economy?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago

That's what I heard people said, but I suspect it was more the anti-immigrant, christian nationalist, white supremacist, misogynist not wanting to out themselves so they said things like the 'price of eggs' or 'the economy' instead of 'I'm scared of everything I don't understand like diversity and worker solidarity' or 'i don't want to be treated the way I treat minorities'.

[–] O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee 8 points 18 hours ago

That's what they kept saying...

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 32 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I'm so glad that as a millennial I get to live through so many different historic times.../s

[–] alexplex@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Would you prefer to live through the world wars or the cold war? Or any other time in history?

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago

How many once in a lifetime economic events is this now?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

O'Doyle rules!

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago

Who knew that Tarriffs, a historically bad idea when used broadly and heavily, would be bad for an economy propped up by massive consumer debt and a stock market existing solely on speculation/over valuation?

[–] NovaOG@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

we're in a recession right now. this is the beginning of one. people mass selling off their stocks to take money and that shakes all markets down the river is exactly a recession start. get ready folks.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

He did that in theee month. Only 4 more years to go

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

13 hours later and I had the arrogance to think I had an original comment.

And you italicized it! Well done!

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 127 points 1 day ago (9 children)

"...and right here is where I'm going to manufacture the worst economic crash since the literal Plague."

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As bad as this is, it can still get a lot worse. The market seems to be pricing in a high probability that Trump will reverse course. If the tariffs stay on for at least a few months, there will certainly be a recession, probably a depression, and possibly social unrest that will take decades to fully recover from.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When things really crash is when the rich will decide to pay their cash and start buying up shit, and then we will think the economy recovered but really all that happened is another wealth redistribution in the wrong direction

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 5 points 22 hours ago

Maybe but it could crash anyways. JP Morgan tried to stabilize the stock market in 1929 by buying up stocks, but it collapsed anyways and led to the Great Depression.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...and cancelling 500k work visas just few days ago, that should hit the economy too

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And everyone being deported as well. Even most of the illegals paid into the economy. Now we're taking that away and spending who knows what to create chaos.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an impoverished no body with nothing to lose in this country, I’ve just been laughing my ass off.

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This is bad for us too. A cratering stock market slows down hiring which depresses wages and makes it harder to find work.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago

I'd argue that's reversing cause and effect. A cratering economy on Main Street often gets reflected as a crash on Wall Street.

Sometimes the outcomes diverge. One common analogy in finance circles is that the stock market is like a hyperactive puppy on a long leash being walked by a slow owner whose gradual movements trend in a particular direction while the puppy erratically moves back and forth near that owner. Maybe it's some kind of hype or panic moving markets in a way that's uncorrelated with the underlying economic activity. Or it's a specific play on a specific type of financial instrument that has become untethered from a thing it used to be tightly wound up with. Many financial panics happen when correlations between things break down, and all the financial engineering in a particular type of product relied on a bad assumption so that it spreads to other financial products.

But in many cases, they move together because the people buying and selling stocks feel sentiment driven by actual economic fundamentals.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Yeah, it’s absolutely fucked. My laughter comes from a place of being glad that some faces got ripped to shreds by leopards and then also because it’s the only thing to keep my mind from totally fizzing out from this mountainous heap of daily shit we’re subjected to. And then the rest of the world is getting dragged into it so fuck. Just fuck.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Let's cancel student loans too, that will own the libs!

It was worth a shot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Time to recycle some things...

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Better quality version (I think)

[–] AnjunaSouls@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

"1,000,000 men out of employment"

Certainly showing it's age there. You'd never see unemployment statistics announced that way today. Not even sure if this is because of how "men" used to be used to refer to people in a more general way, or because women didn't make up a significant portion of the workforce (or because they didn't care about that demographic...)

"Net loss of gold in exports" too... Usually we see GDP used for that kind of statistic now

load more comments
view more: next ›