this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31219 readers
1532 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] krelvar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

"On Tuesdays you get to direct traffic with your penis."

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Travel Agents. I remember growing up they were all over the place and people had to go to them to book flights and hotels or buy package holidays.

They're all but gone now. I'm vaguely aware there may still be some specialist ones left catering to elderly boomers?

Its an entire business and career path thats completely gone, replaced by websites and at a push generic call centres (some people still book over the phone I guess?)

Until Covid one of my co workers was a travel agent. It’s a not insignificant field. People still want to plan their trip and need some advice and would rather pay someone who knows their shit vs digging through the internet.

[–] th3dogcow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Here in Japan, travel agents are still around. The brick and mortar ones have actually branched out to offer their services online, too.

I assume they mostly survive on people who want to book a package tour, which are insanely popular here.

Some of them will now charge a consultation fee whether you buy something or not, so you can see how the industry is hurting.

Although I'm not a boomer, I did use one last year as they are great for just showing you all the options in a very clear way. With just an hour to spare to book a family trip, it was the way to go (for me at least).

I do think that next time I will use them to consult, but then book online to avoid their fee. Also, it seems that booking though the agent makes the ticket less flexible (the airline will lock out some parts of their website and tell you to have the agent do the thing which you wanted to)

So, yeah, it'll be just like shopping. Go to the store to look and get info, then buy online to save money.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of print media is dead. Magazines have shriveled up. Newspapers are dying.

I don't think the Internet provided an equivalent replacement.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, a lot of traditional media really did get clobbered by the Internet.

considers

I think that some of what did that in was access to user-driven forums and other social media. Reddit. And, well...us here on the Threadiverse.

Used to be that if you lived in a small town somewhere, you probably didn't have much ability to connect up with people and businesses and stuff that shared your interests. Not a large pool to draw from. But you could have a magazine for a given hobby. You'd have some people expert in the field to curate material. User input could be provided in the form of letters. Companies serving the field could promote their products.

In large cities, maybe you could have a club for shared interests, meet sporadically. But outside of that, not a lot of options.

But once you introduce online forums, suddenly people with particular interests can be connected from all over the world. And while, yeah, you don't necessarily have paid people full-time contributing content on the forum (though websites elsewhere can be linked to), there's enough overlap that you just don't need that.

Some of it is that companies (or hobbyists) can just put up their own websites, and they can be searched for and linked to from places like those forums. I don't need a magazine to make me aware of company X having some new offering any more.

It doesn't completely fill the same role, but I think that there's enough overlap that it more-or-less replaces most things that magazines did.

And to some extent, magazines still exist, just in the form of websites with digital editions. Like, National Geographic is a thing


actually, they still do a print edition too


but they have a subscription website.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 13 minutes ago

Sitting here and chilling with experts who have decades of experience and might just laugh me out of the room IRL is a miracle. Fuck magazines by that standard. And don't even get me started on the people who live near me.

I think we might be through the worse of the press collapse, too. From what I've heard the digital subscription model is working well.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 25 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

The thing a lot of people fail to understand about many technologies is that they don't always eliminate ALL of something.

The internet didn't eliminate all of almost any job, but it significantly reduced the number of people working in many jobs.

Significant impacts reductions have been felt in:

  • Mail delivery
  • Retail workers
  • Newspapers
  • Landline Telephone Services
  • Photograph printing
  • Encyclopedias
  • Movie theaters
  • Video Game Arcades

and more

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

It appears the last commercial telegram was sent in 2013. 2006 in America.

As you can imagine, it was a damn small niche by the 21st century, since phones had deep penetration already by WWII, but it was there.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The internet didn’t eliminate all of almost any job, but it significantly reduced the number of people working in many jobs.

Movie theaters

I don't know. Looking online, it looks like the peak ticket sale year was something like 2002. The rise of streaming video really came later. Wikipedia says that Netflix started doing streaming video in 2007, and they weren't that big for some time.

I think that a larger factor was the increasing deployment of non-Internet technologies:

  • The television in the home.

  • The videocassette recorder, to let one play videos at home rather than watching broadcast material.

  • Cable and other forms of pay television.

  • Higher-fidelity video storage media, like DVDs and later Blu-Ray. I think that that's maybe what finally tipped the balance into decline, but theaters had been having to fight headwinds from earlier stuff long before that.

The drive-in theater, which I think more-directly competed with home video, peaked well before that. You had your own semi-private viewing box, more-akin to being able to view something in your own home:

Decline (1970s–1990s)

Several factors contributed to the decline of the drive-in movie industry. Beginning in the late 1960s, drive-in attendance began to decline as the result of improvements and changes to home entertainment, from color television and cable TV to VCRs and video rental in the early 1980s. Additionally, the 1970s energy crisis led to the widespread adoption of daylight saving time (which caused drive-in movies to start an hour later) and lower use of automobiles, making it increasingly difficult for drive-ins to remain profitable.

Mainly following the advent of cable television and video cassette recorder (VCR), then with the arrival of DVD and streaming systems, families were able to enjoy movies in the comfort of their homes. The new entertainment technology increased the options and the movie watching experience.[22]

That'd be long before the Internet was playing a role in video.

Video Game Arcades

I'm pretty sure that those peaked in the 1970s or 1980s, and I think that home video game consoles were the major factor there, not the Internet.

kagis

Sounds like about 1982, for North America.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_age_of_arcade_video_games

The golden age was a time of great technical and design creativity in arcade games. The era saw the rapid spread of video arcades across North America, Europe, and Asia. The number of video game arcades in North America was doubled between 1980 and 1982;[6] reaching a peak of 10,000 video game arcades across the region (compared to 4,000 as of 1998).[7] Beginning with Space Invaders, video arcade games also started to appear in supermarkets, restaurants, liquor stores, gas stations, and many other retail establishments looking for extra income.[8] Video game arcades at the time became as common as convenience stores, while arcade games like Pac-Man and Space Invaders appeared in most locations across the United States, including even funeral homes.[9] The sales of arcade video game machines increased during this period from $50 million in 1978 to $900 million in 1981,[6] with 500,000 arcade machines sold in the United States at prices ranging as high as $3,000 in 1982 alone.[10] By 1982, there were 24,000 full arcades, 400,000 arcade street locations and 1.5 million arcade machines active in North America.[11] The market was very competitive; the average life span of an arcade game was four to six months. Some games like Robby Roto failed because they were too complex to learn quickly. Qix was briefly very popular but, Taito's Keith Egging later said, "too mystifying for gamers...impossible to master and when the novelty wore off, the game faded".[12] Around this time, the home video game industry (second-generation video game consoles and early home computer games) emerged as "an outgrowth of the widespread success of video arcades".[13]

The golden age of arcade games began to wane in 1983 due to a plethora of clones of popular titles that saturated arcades, the rise of home video game consoles, both coupled with a moral panic on the influence of arcades and video games on children. This fall occurred during the same time as the video game crash of 1983 but for different reasons, though both marred revenues within the North American video game industry for several years.

Home video game consoles were winning on price, but there were still some years where arcades used more-expensive hardware, so could run more graphically-impressive games. I remember the (pricy) Neo Geo in particular driving flashier arcade hardware than was generally available to home console users. WP says that that was released in 1990, so there was still over a decade remaining where arcades could still sell themselves on high-end video games. Plus, arcade controls were better-suited to some video games, like having six buttons and a fightstick for fighting games.

But, anyway, my real point is that all that really came prior to widespread Internet availability changing the scene. Technology did alter that environment and obsolete things, but the Internet wasn't really the big factor there.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

All new technologies eventually displace obsolete jobs. But crucially, they usually do it slowly enough that the workers whose jobs are being obsoleted aren't all sacked virtually overnight (i.e. society has the time to evolve relatively peacefully) and more of the new and better paying jobs are created for newer generations.

The internet is no different. My Grandpa was a telegraph operator. My Father worked for AT&T installing landlines and I'm a computer guy. Both their jobs are virtually gone and mine will be soon. But I did manage to make a career out of it.

The first real, violent disruption is happening now however: AI is on the verge of obsoleting a MAJORITY of all jobs within a few years, and no new jobs are really created to replace them. Society will be deeply uprooted and won't have time to prepare for the shift. A lot of people will lose their jobs with no alternatives to put food on the table. That's a recipe for war.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

AI & AGI have me kinda terrified because of how we worship the rights of ownership especially in America.

Some major company will own the AI/AGI and will have the right to all of the profits it generates. Combining AGI with the advancements of robotics, pretty much any job that could justify the expenditure of the robot and AGI will be eliminated. With how we treat the rights of ownership and with how the ownership class sees the rest of humanity, the only future I see is a future where "we have too many people" is the only conversation and not because we can't feed them or house them, but because there isn't enough work for them to "earn their own living." The ownership class will never accept "giving" anything away to help people that "aren't productive." You're not a human, you're a profit generating labor machine.

So: Work or Die!™ Now with 95% less jobs!

Fun future. :(

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

I've heard this called exterminism. Woe be to whichever proles they decide to keep as pets.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 11 hours ago

AI & AGI have me kinda terrified

If you're young, you should be.

I'm not and I'm nearing the end of my professional career. Even if I get the sack tomorrow, I've had a very good run. And I have other skills that simply can't be replaced by AI or robots, so I'm not really worried. Concerned, yes. But not worried.

But I know I won't have any retirement, that's for damn sure. Still, it beats not having any professional prospects from the get-go.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

The main threat of AI is that it's software. At least when robots displaced factory jobs, they introduced robot design, manufacturing, and maintenance jobs. But software is infinitely scalable. You don't have to program every new instance of a software, it's just copy paste. Sure there's tailoring, debugging, and developing new models, but the number of jobs displaced is orders of magnitude higher than jobs created, and rollout is relatively quick and easy. Once a software is mature enough, it can displace an entire industry basically overnight.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

There was a river rafting company not too far from where I live that switched to carrier pigeons to deliver SD cards to home base.

They had photographers stationed at a few points down river taking pictures of the clients, after each group had passed they put the SD card on one pigeon and it flew straight to base. By the time the clients were back to base the pictures were already printed and no one had to hurry back or rely on having good enough signal.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

I hope they used rfc1149.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

Comments like this make asking these questions so worth it. That's such a cool thing to know is happening somewhere!

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

TCP and UDP are still possible over layer 2 avian carrier

[–] cereals@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 hours ago

Theres even QoS in RFC2549

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 12 hours ago

Prior to the widespread adoption of the Web, it used to be necessary to talk to a lot of people on telephones to accomplish the same sorts of tasks that we do on websites today. Ordering products. Requesting forms. Starting/changing/terminating services. If you want to do business with someone, either you have to have a brick-and-mortar office near them, or be able to take calls. And people had to field those calls.

That doesn't mean that call centers don't exist any more, but they're a lot less important as a way to interact with a company.

Prior to telephones, it tended to require sending letters, and I'm sure that there were a ton of people who had to open, process, and write correspondence that telephones replaced (though in that case, I suspect that there was some overlap, though the skillset isn't exactly the same; a good typewriter operator isn't necessarily great on the telephone and visa versa).

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Postal workers have takes a significant cut with the popularisation of email.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

From speaking to a career USPS worker...

Ages ago you'd start your day and spend 4-6 hours sorting buckets of envelopes and packages. Then organizing them in smaller batches by block/street. Then 2~4 hours running your route.

Now they have machines do pretty much all the sorting. But you still got a 8 hour shift. So it's 7+ hours of walking instead of the old 2~4. It's extremely physically demanding since you now have to deliver four times the mail due to the automation of part of your job.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The saving grace for postal services is the rise of online stores like Amazon. They all shifted from delivering mail to delivering parcels.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

They actually deliver a third of all UPS and FedEx ground packages in the US.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 6 points 11 hours ago

Blockbuster employee.